From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3BEA034E;
	Wed, 22 Dec 2021 16:23:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C80740687;
	Wed, 22 Dec 2021 16:23:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D8740040;
 Wed, 22 Dec 2021 16:23:48 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
 d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel;
 t=1640186629; x=1671722629;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:
 mime-version:in-reply-to;
 bh=321jJx60uxCP/E4fsIJ5GE3F/PQQtwmuGrU6DEYrY4U=;
 b=Wk1HCa+q64UV+IkzveEVPCrjrl391hlhYknbQC+zbEiO6ydeWjRdP0Yw
 MJGSWVfsnqUSQpmaRBe4eq/ZI3k0QQs4OxmWhNHUnz7HNcUqswMRBVxvW
 HpxImCcwJR+BM2uX6Pb5R37AcQHmNNdr4KqAKhyZXW8VJPm7jNIZkD0GS
 OuAROVyP4YcaJk1b4aQARaZm0GJQZdJvnWrkU/6kyTC26IqPe8Q7Pd9+e
 RLsaKSl3zJRpRIzzaAyCjbNUqskU8e8aR/7cbXUdnO6excgB5gO/AXRzg
 L+G5CJkOOripMnet0ZxS7lmJkEMrIlfCzGMYUriHVBMr+euIH5ZYcqHO7 A==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10205"; a="239394276"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,226,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="239394276"
Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27])
 by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 22 Dec 2021 07:23:47 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,226,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="466696954"
Received: from bricha3-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.23.107])
 by orsmga003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA;
 22 Dec 2021 07:23:45 -0800
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:23:42 +0000
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, bluca@debian.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] doc/examples: fix build on
 FreeBSD
Message-ID: <YcNC/nKaZr3hscwn@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <20210915173633.59057-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
 <1645178.3i6yeRJgWt@thomas>
 <YVcsDoruXujCVUTK@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <7246004.BAT3AUThdf@thomas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7246004.BAT3AUThdf@thomas>
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 11:20:17AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 01/10/2021 17:41, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 05:36:51PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 01/10/2021 17:15, Bruce Richardson:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 05:03:11PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > 15/09/2021 19:36, Bruce Richardson:
> > > > > > On FreeBSD, "find" does not support the "printf" flag, so we
> > > > > > need to use "gfind" from the "findutils" package.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It is one more dependency.  Shouldn't we avoid it by rewritting
> > > > > the shell commands with loops?
> > > > >
> > > > Probably in the longer term, yes. If I get the chance, I'll try and
> > > > rewrite this script, but let's keep this patch in the queue in case
> > > > I don't get to in the 21.11 timeframe.
> > > 
> > > OK I can help with the shell tricks if needed.
> > > 
> > Well, I was actually considering a rewrite in python for two reasons: *
> > easy FS scans using the "walk()" function * portability across OS's
> > [which is the main reason for the work after all]
> 
> Applied this patch for 21.11.
>
Following up on this thread, implemented an alternative fix for this issue
which does not use the extra findutils dependency[1]. I didn't rewrite the
script in python as was my original intent, but used basic shell commands
to work around the lack of printf support in find, leading to a simpler
fix.

/Bruce

[1] http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20211222151855.803916-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com/