From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com,
stable@dpdk.org, Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
Deepak Kumar Jain <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] crypto/ipsec_mb: fix build with GCC 12
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 10:50:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YpiH7C/8xWgajyzw@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220518101657.1230416-4-david.marchand@redhat.com>
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 12:16:48PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> GCC 12 raises the following warning:
>
> In function ‘__rte_ring_enqueue_elems_64’,
> inlined from ‘__rte_ring_enqueue_elems’ at
> ../lib/ring/rte_ring_elem_pvt.h:130:3,
> inlined from ‘__rte_ring_do_hts_enqueue_elem’ at
> ../lib/ring/rte_ring_hts_elem_pvt.h:196:3,
> inlined from ‘rte_ring_mp_hts_enqueue_burst_elem’ at
> ../lib/ring/rte_ring_hts.h:110:9,
> inlined from ‘rte_ring_enqueue_burst_elem’ at
> ../lib/ring/rte_ring_elem.h:577:10,
> inlined from ‘rte_ring_enqueue_burst’ at
> ../lib/ring/rte_ring.h:738:9,
> inlined from ‘process_op_bit’ at
> ../drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/pmd_snow3g.c:425:16,
> inlined from ‘snow3g_pmd_dequeue_burst’ at
> ../drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/pmd_snow3g.c:484:20:
> ../lib/ring/rte_ring_elem_pvt.h:68:44: error: array subscript 1 is
> outside array bounds of ‘struct rte_crypto_op[0]’
> [-Werror=array-bounds]
> 68 | ring[idx + 1] = obj[i + 1];
> | ~~~^~~~~~~
> ../drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/pmd_snow3g.c: In function
> ‘snow3g_pmd_dequeue_burst’:
> ../drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/pmd_snow3g.c:434:1: note:
> at offset 8 into object ‘op’ of size 8
> 434 | snow3g_pmd_dequeue_burst(void *queue_pair,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Validate that one (exactly) op has been processed or return early.
>
> Fixes: b537abdbee74 ("crypto/snow3g: support bit-level operations")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/pmd_snow3g.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/pmd_snow3g.c b/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/pmd_snow3g.c
> index ebc9a0b562..9a85f46721 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/pmd_snow3g.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/pmd_snow3g.c
> @@ -422,12 +422,13 @@ process_op_bit(struct rte_crypto_op *op, struct snow3g_session *session,
> op->sym->session = NULL;
> }
>
> - enqueued_op = rte_ring_enqueue_burst(qp->ingress_queue,
> - (void **)&op, processed_op, NULL);
> + if (unlikely(processed_op != 1))
> + return 0;
> + enqueued_op = rte_ring_enqueue(qp->ingress_queue, op);
As a fix for the compiler warning this looks ok, but question for
maintainer would be - should this check for processed_op != 1 not go
earlier in the function, immediately after the switch statement?
Fan, Pablo, can you please comment?
/Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-02 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-18 10:16 [PATCH 00/12] Fix compilation with gcc 12 David Marchand
2022-05-18 10:16 ` [PATCH 01/12] common/cpt: fix build with GCC 12 David Marchand
2022-05-20 20:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-06-10 13:11 ` David Marchand
2022-06-13 11:40 ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-06-16 9:30 ` David Marchand
2022-06-16 11:59 ` Ankur Dwivedi
2022-05-18 10:16 ` [PATCH 02/12] crypto/cnxk: " David Marchand
2022-05-20 20:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-18 10:16 ` [PATCH 03/12] crypto/ipsec_mb: " David Marchand
2022-06-02 9:50 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2022-06-10 13:07 ` David Marchand
2022-06-11 15:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-18 10:16 ` [PATCH 04/12] net/ena: " David Marchand
2022-05-20 20:28 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-21 9:49 ` Morten Brørup
2022-05-21 16:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-22 20:30 ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-11 15:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-18 10:16 ` [PATCH 05/12] net/enetfec: " David Marchand
2022-06-10 13:08 ` David Marchand
2022-06-13 5:22 ` Sachin Saxena (OSS)
2022-06-14 8:16 ` Sachin Saxena (OSS)
2022-06-11 15:35 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-18 10:16 ` [PATCH 06/12] net/ice: " David Marchand
2022-06-11 15:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-18 10:16 ` [PATCH 07/12] net/ice/base: " David Marchand
2022-05-18 10:16 ` [PATCH 08/12] net/qede/base: " David Marchand
2022-05-20 20:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-06-21 23:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-06-22 15:42 ` David Marchand
2022-05-18 10:16 ` [PATCH 09/12] vdpa/ifc: " David Marchand
2022-05-18 11:48 ` Wang, Xiao W
2022-06-11 15:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-18 10:16 ` [PATCH 10/12] vhost/crypto: " David Marchand
2022-06-02 10:08 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-06-14 9:22 ` David Marchand
2022-06-14 9:25 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-06-16 9:27 ` David Marchand
2022-06-11 15:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-06-16 9:32 ` [PATCH v2] " David Marchand
2022-06-16 14:53 ` David Marchand
2022-05-18 10:16 ` [PATCH 11/12] app/flow-perf: " David Marchand
2022-06-02 10:21 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-06-08 9:03 ` Wisam Monther
2022-06-08 12:20 ` David Marchand
2022-06-13 7:49 ` Wisam Monther
2022-06-11 15:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-18 10:16 ` [PATCH 12/12] test/ipsec: " David Marchand
2022-06-02 18:41 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2022-06-03 7:45 ` David Marchand
2022-06-03 7:56 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-06-03 9:41 ` David Marchand
2022-06-03 15:57 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2022-06-11 15:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-06-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v2] " David Marchand
2022-06-17 12:06 ` David Marchand
2022-06-20 9:07 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-06-20 15:06 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2022-06-16 14:46 ` [PATCH v3] vhost/crypto: " David Marchand
2022-06-17 13:59 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-06-21 9:31 ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-06-22 9:01 ` Poczatek, Jakub
2022-06-22 9:26 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-06-22 14:07 ` David Marchand
2022-06-22 15:21 ` Poczatek, Jakub
2022-06-22 15:31 ` David Marchand
2022-05-20 20:13 ` [PATCH 00/12] Fix compilation with gcc 12 Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-21 9:39 ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-15 8:49 ` David Marchand
2022-06-15 14:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-06-15 14:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-06-15 15:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YpiH7C/8xWgajyzw@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=deepak.k.jain@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).