DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Shaiq Wani <shaiq.wani@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] net/intel: use common Tx queue structure
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 17:22:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-ba3PJtd2aZYvD8@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250327160437.2296127-3-shaiq.wani@intel.com>

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 09:34:35PM +0530, Shaiq Wani wrote:
> Merge in additional fields used by the idpf driver and then convert it
> over to using the common Tx queue structure
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaiq Wani <shaiq.wani@intel.com>

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

Some comments inline below.

> ---
>  drivers/net/intel/common/tx.h                 | 20 +++++++
>  drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.c          |  3 +-
>  drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_ethdev.h          |  2 +-
>  drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_rxtx.c            | 26 ++++-----
>  drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_rxtx.h            |  3 +-
>  drivers/net/intel/cpfl/cpfl_rxtx_vec_common.h |  3 +-
>  drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx.c     | 36 ++++++------
>  drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx.h     | 58 +++----------------
>  .../net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx_avx2.c    | 12 ++--
>  .../net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_rxtx_avx512.c  | 21 +++----
>  drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_virtchnl.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_common_virtchnl.h |  2 +-
>  drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_ethdev.c          |  3 +-
>  drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_rxtx.c            | 21 ++++---
>  drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_rxtx.h            |  1 +
>  drivers/net/intel/idpf/idpf_rxtx_vec_common.h |  5 +-
>  16 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
> 

<snip>

>  static int
> -cpfl_tx_complq_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct idpf_tx_queue *txq,
> +cpfl_tx_complq_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct ci_tx_queue *txq,
>  		     uint16_t queue_idx, uint16_t nb_desc,
>  		     unsigned int socket_id)
>  {
>  	struct cpfl_vport *cpfl_vport = dev->data->dev_private;
>  	struct idpf_vport *vport = &cpfl_vport->base;
>  	const struct rte_memzone *mz;
> -	struct idpf_tx_queue *cq;
> +	struct ci_tx_queue *cq;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	cq = rte_zmalloc_socket("cpfl splitq cq",
> -				sizeof(struct idpf_tx_queue),
> +				sizeof(struct ci_tx_queue),

Minor nit, but this would be more maintainable I think as "sizeof(*cq)" so
if you have to change the type of cq again in future, only on line needs to
change.

>  				RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE,
>  				socket_id);
>  	if (cq == NULL) {
> @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ cpfl_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_idx,
>  	struct cpfl_tx_queue *cpfl_txq;

<snip>

>  void
> -idpf_qc_split_tx_descq_reset(struct idpf_tx_queue *txq)
> +idpf_qc_split_tx_descq_reset(struct ci_tx_queue *txq)
>  {
>  	struct idpf_tx_entry *txe;
>  	uint32_t i, size;
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ idpf_qc_split_tx_descq_reset(struct idpf_tx_queue *txq)
>  	for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
>  		((volatile char *)txq->desc_ring)[i] = 0;
>  
> -	txe = txq->sw_ring;
> +	txe = (struct idpf_tx_entry *)txq->sw_ring;

As I comment on the next patch in the series, if you change the order of
these two patches, you won't need to introduce these new typecasts.


>  	prev = (uint16_t)(txq->sw_nb_desc - 1);
>  	for (i = 0; i < txq->sw_nb_desc; i++) {
>  		txe[i].mbuf = NULL;
> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ idpf_qc_split_tx_descq_reset(struct idpf_tx_queue *txq)
>  }

<snip>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-28 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-12 15:53 [PATCH] net/intel: using common functions in idpf driver Shaiq Wani
2025-03-12 16:38 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-24 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Use common structures and fns in IDPF and Shaiq Wani
2025-03-24 12:39   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] net/intel: use common Tx queue structure Shaiq Wani
2025-03-24 12:49     ` [PATCH v3 0/4] using common functions in idpf driver Shaiq Wani
2025-03-24 12:49       ` [PATCH v3 1/4] net/intel: use common Tx queue structure Shaiq Wani
2025-03-27 10:44         ` [PATCH v4 0/4] net/intel: using common functions in idpf driver Shaiq Wani
2025-03-27 10:44           ` [PATCH v4 1/4] net/intel: align Tx queue struct field names Shaiq Wani
2025-03-27 16:04             ` [PATCH v5 0/4] net/intel: using common functions in idpf driver Shaiq Wani
2025-03-27 16:04               ` [PATCH v5 1/4] net/intel: align Tx queue struct field names Shaiq Wani
2025-03-28 16:57                 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-27 16:04               ` [PATCH v5 2/4] net/intel: use common Tx queue structure Shaiq Wani
2025-03-28 17:22                 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2025-03-28 17:55                 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-27 16:04               ` [PATCH v5 3/4] net/intel: use common Tx entry structure Shaiq Wani
2025-03-28 17:17                 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-27 16:04               ` [PATCH v5 4/4] net/idpf: use common Tx free fn in idpf Shaiq Wani
2025-03-28 17:25                 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-28 15:29               ` [PATCH v5 0/4] net/intel: using common functions in idpf driver Bruce Richardson
2025-03-28 15:36                 ` David Marchand
2025-03-28 17:58               ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-27 10:45           ` [PATCH v4 2/4] net/intel: use common Tx queue structure Shaiq Wani
2025-03-27 10:45           ` [PATCH v4 3/4] net/intel: use common Tx entry structure Shaiq Wani
2025-03-27 10:45           ` [PATCH v4 4/4] net/idpf: use common Tx free fn in idpf Shaiq Wani
2025-03-24 12:49       ` [PATCH v3 2/4] net/intel: align Tx queue struct field names Shaiq Wani
2025-03-24 13:16         ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-24 12:49       ` [PATCH v3 3/4] net/intel: use common Tx entry structure Shaiq Wani
2025-03-24 12:49       ` [PATCH v3 4/4] net/idpf: use common Tx free fn in idpf Shaiq Wani
2025-03-24 12:39   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] net/intel: align Tx queue struct field names Shaiq Wani
2025-03-24 12:40   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] net/intel: use common Tx entry structure Shaiq Wani
2025-03-24 12:40   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] net/idpf: use common Tx free fn in idpf Shaiq Wani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z-ba3PJtd2aZYvD8@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=shaiq.wani@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).