From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 09:15:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6MsP35NONKe7wSb@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1738695271-29948-1-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 10:54:24AM -0800, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> Macro __SIZEOF_LONG__ is not standardized and MSVC does not define it.
> Therefore the errors below are seen with MSVC:
>
> ../lib/mldev/mldev_utils_scalar.c(465): error C2065:
> '__SIZEOF_LONG__': undeclared identifier
> ../lib/mldev/mldev_utils_scalar.c(478): error C2051:
> case expression not constant
>
> ../lib/mldev/mldev_utils_scalar_bfloat16.c(33): error C2065:
> '__SIZEOF_LONG__': undeclared identifier
> ../lib/mldev/mldev_utils_scalar_bfloat16.c(49): error C2051:
> case expression not constant
>
> Turns out that the places where __SIZEOF_LONG__ is currently
> being used can equally well use sizeof(long) instead.
>
> v4:
> * rebased on latest main as previous patch was not applying cleanly
> anymore.
>
> v3:
> * added prefix RTE_ to BITS_PER_LONG* and moved them to rte_common.h
> * defined PLT_BITS_PER_LONG* in drivers/common/cnxk/roc_platform.h to
> avoid warnings from checkpatches.sh like:
>
> Warning in drivers/common/cnxk/roc_bits.h:
> Warning in drivers/common/cnxk/roc_ie_ot.h:
> Warning in drivers/common/cnxk/roc_ie_ot_tls.h:
> Use plt_ symbols instead of rte_ API in cnxk base driver
>
> It can be seen that the same was done in the past for similar
> macros like PLT_CACHE_LINE_SIZE
>
> v2:
> * fixed typo in commit message
>
> Andre Muezerie (7):
> eal: eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
> drivers/bus: eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
> drivers/common: eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
> drivers/dma: eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
> drivers/net: eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
> drivers/raw: eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
> mldev: eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
>
Just out of interest, is there are reason why the simple solution of just
putting "#define __SIZEOF_LONG__ (sizeof(long))" in a header file for MSVC
is not done? Should be a couple of lines in a single patch, rather than a
7-patch series, no?
After all, just because something is non-standard, doesn't mean that we
can't use it if its widely available.
/Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-05 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-04 20:09 [PATCH 0/6] " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-04 20:09 ` [PATCH 1/6] drivers/bus: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-04 21:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-04 21:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] drivers/bus: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-04 21:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] drivers/common: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-04 21:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drivers/dma: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-04 21:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] drivers/net: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-04 21:41 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] drivers/raw: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-04 21:41 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] lib/mldev: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-05 4:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-05 4:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] lib/eal: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-05 4:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drivers/bus: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-06 12:22 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-12-06 16:19 ` Andre Muezerie
2024-12-06 16:41 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-12-06 16:43 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-12-06 18:14 ` Andre Muezerie
2025-02-04 15:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-12-05 4:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drivers/common: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-05 4:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drivers/dma: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-05 4:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drivers/net: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-05 4:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drivers/raw: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-05 4:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] lib/mldev: " Andre Muezerie
2025-02-04 18:54 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] " Andre Muezerie
2025-02-04 18:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] eal: " Andre Muezerie
2025-02-04 18:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] drivers/bus: " Andre Muezerie
2025-02-04 18:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] drivers/common: " Andre Muezerie
2025-02-04 18:54 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] drivers/dma: " Andre Muezerie
2025-02-04 18:54 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] drivers/net: " Andre Muezerie
2025-02-04 18:54 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] drivers/raw: " Andre Muezerie
2025-02-04 18:54 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] mldev: " Andre Muezerie
2025-02-05 9:15 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2025-02-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] " Andre Muezerie
2025-02-05 15:47 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-02-05 15:50 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-12-04 20:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] drivers/common: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-05 1:14 ` Chaoyong He
2024-12-04 20:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] drivers/dma: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-04 20:09 ` [PATCH 4/6] drivers/net: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-04 20:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] drivers/raw: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-04 20:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] lib/mldev: " Andre Muezerie
2024-12-04 21:50 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Stephen Hemminger
2024-12-05 4:19 ` Andre Muezerie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6MsP35NONKe7wSb@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=andremue@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).