DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Praveen Shetty <praveen.shetty@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ice: fix incorrect mbuf cleanup function
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:42:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z73k_zxfKwcOEj0n@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e63850f1-cc15-4678-bf91-1f9bdf44b69a@intel.com>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 02:43:07PM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 21/02/2025 17:04, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > The mbuf cleanup function is not being called correctly on close of the
> > driver, due to the vector_tx flag not being set correctly on each Tx
> > queue. Normally, this causes no visible problems, because the default is
> > to have the vector flag unset, which means that, if vector Tx path is
> > chosen, we only free every second mbuf in the descriptor vector ring - a
> > subtle memory leak.
> > 
> > The reverse case - where we initially configure a port to use a vector
> > driver, and then later reconfigure it for scalar - causes a segfault on
> > close, as the vector cleanup is used on a scalar SW ring, and that
> > vector path treats the extra metadata in the SW ring as mbufs to be
> > freed.
> > 
> > This is due to an inconsistency across drivers on port start: in e.g.
> > the i40e driver, the Rx and Tx functions are chosen before the
> > individual queues are started, while in ice driver the order is
> > reversed.  Because the Tx function selection is done after the queues
> > are initialized, the initialized queues use an old value of the overall
> > flag indicating if a vector Tx path is being used.
> > 
> > Fix the issue by moving the Rx and Tx path selection before queue start.
> > 
> > Fixes: 552979dfb1c9 ("net/intel: create common Tx queue mbuf cleanup")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> > ---
> Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> 
Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.

/Bruce

      reply	other threads:[~2025-02-25 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-21 16:04 Bruce Richardson
2025-02-24 13:43 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-02-25 15:42   ` Bruce Richardson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z73k_zxfKwcOEj0n@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=praveen.shetty@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).