* Re: [PATCH] doc: provide examples of using lcores EAL parameter
2025-04-07 13:24 [PATCH] doc: provide examples of using lcores EAL parameter Bruce Richardson
@ 2025-04-07 13:27 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-04-07 14:19 ` Morten Brørup
2025-04-07 15:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Richardson @ 2025-04-07 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: mb
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 02:24:51PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> The "--lcores" EAL parameter has a very powerful syntax that can be used
> to provide precise control over lcore mappings. The docs however, only
> provided a minimal description of what it can do. Augment the docs by
> providing some examples of use of the option, and what the resulting
> core mappings would be.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
> doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst b/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst
> index 9cfbf7de84..081f09d353 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst
> @@ -29,6 +29,31 @@ Lcore-related options
> The grouping ``()`` can be omitted for single element group.
> The ``@`` can be omitted if cpus and lcores have the same value.
>
> + Examples:
> +
> + ``--lcores=1-3``: Run threads on physical CPUs 1, 2 and 3,
> + with each thread having the same lcore id as the physical CPU id.
> +
> + ``--lcores=1@(1,2)``: Run a single thread with lcore id 1,
> + but with that thread bound to both physical CPUs 1 and 2,
> + so it can run on either, as determined by the operating system.
> +
> + ``--lcores='1@31,2@32,3@33'``: Run threads having internal lcore ids of 1, 2 and 3,
> + but with the threads being bound to physical CPUs 31, 32 and 33.
> +
> + ``--lcores='(1-3)@(31-33)'``: Run three threads with lcore ids 1, 2 and 3.
> + Unlike the previous example above,
> + each of these threads is not bound to one specific lcore,
> + but rather, all three threads are instead bound to the three physical cores 31, 32 and 33.
> +
> + ``--lcores=(1-3)@20``: Run three threads, with lcore ids 1, 2 and 3,
> + where all three threads are bound to (can only run on) physical CPU 20.
> +
> +.. Note::
> + Binding multiple DPDK lcores can cause problems with poor performance or deadlock when using
I seem to have missed some words here. :-(
V2 will be done soon. However, I will wait before sending it in case there
is other feedback.
/Bruce
> + DPDK rings or memory pools or spinlocks.
> + Such a configuration should only be used with care.
> +
> .. Note::
> At a given instance only one core option ``--lcores``, ``-l`` or ``-c`` can
> be used.
> --
> 2.45.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] doc: provide examples of using lcores EAL parameter
2025-04-07 13:24 [PATCH] doc: provide examples of using lcores EAL parameter Bruce Richardson
2025-04-07 13:27 ` Bruce Richardson
@ 2025-04-07 14:19 ` Morten Brørup
2025-04-07 15:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2025-04-07 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Richardson, dev
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, 7 April 2025 15.25
>
> The "--lcores" EAL parameter has a very powerful syntax that can be
> used
> to provide precise control over lcore mappings. The docs however, only
> provided a minimal description of what it can do. Augment the docs by
> providing some examples of use of the option, and what the resulting
> core mappings would be.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
> doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst
> b/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst
> index 9cfbf7de84..081f09d353 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst
> @@ -29,6 +29,31 @@ Lcore-related options
> The grouping ``()`` can be omitted for single element group.
> The ``@`` can be omitted if cpus and lcores have the same value.
>
> + Examples:
> +
> + ``--lcores=1-3``: Run threads on physical CPUs 1, 2 and 3,
> + with each thread having the same lcore id as the physical CPU id.
> +
> + ``--lcores=1@(1,2)``: Run a single thread with lcore id 1,
> + but with that thread bound to both physical CPUs 1 and 2,
> + so it can run on either, as determined by the operating system.
> +
> + ``--lcores='1@31,2@32,3@33'``: Run threads having internal lcore
> ids of 1, 2 and 3,
> + but with the threads being bound to physical CPUs 31, 32 and 33.
Maybe add "respectively": "[...] bound to respectively physical CPUs [...]".
> +
> + ``--lcores='(1-3)@(31-33)'``: Run three threads with lcore ids 1,
> 2 and 3.
> + Unlike the previous example above,
> + each of these threads is not bound to one specific lcore,
lcore -> physical CPU
> + but rather, all three threads are instead bound to the three
> physical cores 31, 32 and 33.
cores -> CPUs
> +
> + ``--lcores=(1-3)@20``: Run three threads, with lcore ids 1, 2 and
> 3,
> + where all three threads are bound to (can only run on) physical
> CPU 20.
> +
> +.. Note::
> + Binding multiple DPDK lcores can cause problems with poor
> performance or deadlock when using
"[...] multiple DPDK lcores can cause problems [...]" ->
"[...] multiple DPDK lcores to the same physical CPU can cause problems [...]"
> + DPDK rings or memory pools or spinlocks.
> + Such a configuration should only be used with care.
> +
> .. Note::
> At a given instance only one core option ``--lcores``, ``-l`` or
> ``-c`` can
> be used.
> --
> 2.45.2
With above changes,
Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] doc: provide examples of using lcores EAL parameter
2025-04-07 13:24 [PATCH] doc: provide examples of using lcores EAL parameter Bruce Richardson
2025-04-07 13:27 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-04-07 14:19 ` Morten Brørup
@ 2025-04-07 15:49 ` Bruce Richardson
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Richardson @ 2025-04-07 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Bruce Richardson, Morten Brørup
The "--lcores" EAL parameter has a very powerful syntax that can be used
to provide precise control over lcore mappings. The docs however, only
provided a minimal description of what it can do. Augment the docs by
providing some examples of use of the option, and what the resulting
core mappings would be.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
---
doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst b/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst
index 9cfbf7de84..aafe567bfa 100644
--- a/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/linux_gsg/eal_args.include.rst
@@ -29,6 +29,33 @@ Lcore-related options
The grouping ``()`` can be omitted for single element group.
The ``@`` can be omitted if cpus and lcores have the same value.
+ Examples:
+
+ ``--lcores=1-3``: Run threads on physical CPUs 1, 2 and 3,
+ with each thread having the same lcore id as the physical CPU id.
+
+ ``--lcores=1@(1,2)``: Run a single thread with lcore id 1,
+ but with that thread bound to both physical CPUs 1 and 2,
+ so it can run on either, as determined by the operating system.
+
+ ``--lcores='1@31,2@32,3@33'``: Run threads having internal lcore ids of 1, 2 and 3,
+ but with the threads being bound to physical CPUs 31, 32 and 33 respectively.
+
+ ``--lcores='(1-3)@(31-33)'``: Run three threads with lcore ids 1, 2 and 3.
+ Unlike the previous example above,
+ each of these threads is not bound to one specific physical CPU,
+ but rather, all three threads are instead bound to the three physical CPUs 31, 32 and 33.
+ This means that each of the three threads can move between the physical CPUs 31-33,
+ as decided by the OS as the application runs.
+
+ ``--lcores=(1-3)@20``: Run three threads, with lcore ids 1, 2 and 3,
+ where all three threads are bound to (can only run on) physical CPU 20.
+
+.. Note::
+ Binding multiple DPDK lcores to a single physical CPU can cause problems with poor performance
+ or deadlock when using DPDK rings or memory pools or spinlocks.
+ Such a configuration should only be used with care.
+
.. Note::
At a given instance only one core option ``--lcores``, ``-l`` or ``-c`` can
be used.
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread