Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 20/20] bus/fslmc: add function to map any addr via VFIO

[Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>]

On 12/27/2018 6:23 AM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> From: Pankaj Chauhan <pankaj.chauhan@nxp.com>
> 
> This is required to map any accelerator memory
> and PCI address to VFIO using QDMA.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Chauhan <pankaj.chauhan@nxp.com>

This requires either sign-off or ack from 'bus/fslmc' maintainers, which are:
	M: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>



	M: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>

I think Hemant sending the patchset implies that this has been reviewed by him
but this information get lost in git, so better to explicitly provide review/ack
tags whenever appropriate.

<...>

> +	printf("PCIe vfio map 0x%llx:0x%llx, size 0x%llx\n", dma_map.vaddr,
> +		dma_map.iova, dma_map.size);

This is causing build error [1], but why at first place using 'printf()' instead
of logging macros?

[1]
.../drivers/bus/fslmc/fslmc_vfio.c: In function ‘rte_fslmc_vfio_mem_dmamap’:
.../drivers/bus/fslmc/fslmc_vfio.c:376:29: error: format ‘%llx’ expects argument
of type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘__u64’ {aka ‘long
unsigned int’} [-Werror=format=]
  printf("PCIe vfio map 0x%llx:0x%llx, size 0x%llx\n", dma_map.vaddr,
                          ~~~^                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          %lx

<...>

> +DPDK_19.02 {
> +	global:
> +
> +	rte_fslmc_vfio_mem_dmamap;

Is this need to be an API? Who is the consumer of this API, I don't see anyone
calls this function?