Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] memzone: improve zero-length memzone reserve

["Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>]

On 14-May-18 12:29 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 14-May-18 9:21 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
>> On 11-May-18 11:25 AM, Remy Horton wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/05/2018 18:18, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
>>> [..]
>>>> Also, fixup unit tests to account for the new behavior.
>>>
>>> Tried running the tests but it fails on a boundary check:
>>>
>>> RTE>>memzone_autotest
>>> test basic memzone API
>>> [...]
>>> 1GB Huge pages available
>>> test alignment for memzone_reserve
>>> check alignments and lengths
>>> check overlapping
>>> test boundary alignment for memzone_reserve
>>> check_memzone_bounded(MZ_TEST_bounded_128): invalid memzone boundary 
>>> 128 crossed
>>> Test Failed
>>> RTE>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi Remy,
>>
>> Passes here, but i'll look into it, thanks for the report.
>>
> 
> This failure is not caused by this patchset, and you should get similar 
> failures on master if you get these while testing my patchset. I am not 
> able to reproduce this issue, but i'll double-check the bounded reserve 
> code with a fine-toothed comb anyway.
> 
Further investigation showed that this is indeed related to the new 
code. So, v5 has a bug too, i'll fix it for v6.

-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly