From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6E81B806 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 15:47:36 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Feb 2018 06:47:36 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,479,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="25871977" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.91]) ([10.237.220.91]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2018 06:47:34 -0800 To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, =?UTF-8?Q?N=c3=a9lio_Laranjeiro?= , Shahaf Shuler , adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, yskoh@mellanox.com References: <20180207142336.95200-1-shahafs@mellanox.com> <20180208122600.qifytombg7qoi3zs@laranjeiro-vm.dev.6wind.com> <10497581.4RfMN3Q6bs@xps> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 14:47:34 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <10497581.4RfMN3Q6bs@xps> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: revert support in IPv4 time-to-live filter X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 14:47:37 -0000 On 2/8/2018 2:38 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 08/02/2018 15:35, Ferruh Yigit: >> On 2/8/2018 12:26 PM, NĂ©lio Laranjeiro wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 04:23:36PM +0200, Shahaf Shuler wrote: >>>> Nor upstream kernel nor MLNX_OFED support such filter. >>>> >>>> Reverts commit 0fb2c9842b20 ("net/mlx5: support IPv4 time-to-live filter") >>>> Cc: nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Shahaf Shuler >>> >>> Acked-by: Nelio Laranjeiro >> >> Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks. > > Have you applied the v1 or v2? v2 applied, but I reply to v1 by mistake.