DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" <huwei013@chinasoftinc.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" <huwei013@chinasoftinc.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] app/testpmd: update Rx offload after setting MTU sccessfully
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 08:25:36 +0800
Message-ID: <a680d099-6675-54c5-7466-a25efea684b7@chinasoftinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91ab9f40-80fc-6e3d-e13b-95c0147734da@intel.com>

Hi, Ferruh Yigit

On 2020/1/28 19:27, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 1/21/2020 11:44 AM, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>> From: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" <xavier.huwei@huawei.com>
>>
>> Currently, Rx offload capabilities and max_rx_pkt_len in the struct
>> variable named rte_port are not updated after setting mtu successfully
>> in port_mtu_set function by 'port config mtu <port_id> <value>' command.
>> This may lead to reconfig mtu to the initial value in the driver when
>> recalling rte_eth_dev_configure API interface.
>>
>> This patch updates Rx offload capabilities and max_rx_pkt_len after
>> setting mtu successfully when configuring mtu.
>>
>> Fixes: ae03d0d18adf ("app/testpmd: command to configure MTU")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Hu (Xavier) <xavier.huwei@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   app/test-pmd/config.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
>> index 9669cbd4c..09a1579f5 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
>> @@ -1216,7 +1216,9 @@ void
>>   port_mtu_set(portid_t port_id, uint16_t mtu)
>>   {
>>   	int diag;
>> +	struct rte_port *rte_port = &ports[port_id];
>>   	struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
>> +	uint16_t eth_overhead;
>>   	int ret;
>>   
>>   	if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN))
>> @@ -1232,8 +1234,22 @@ port_mtu_set(portid_t port_id, uint16_t mtu)
>>   		return;
>>   	}
>>   	diag = rte_eth_dev_set_mtu(port_id, mtu);
>> -	if (diag == 0)
>> +	if (diag == 0) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Ether overhead in driver is equal to the difference of
>> +		 * max_rx_pktlen and max_mtu in rte_eth_dev_info.
>> +		 */
>> +		eth_overhead = dev_info.max_rx_pktlen - dev_info.max_mtu;
>> +		if (mtu > RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN - eth_overhead)
>> +			rte_port->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads |=
>> +						DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME;
>> +		else
>> +			rte_port->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &=
>> +						~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME;
> 
> If the jumbo frame capability supported or not should be tested before setting it.
> 
>> +		rte_port->dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len = mtu + eth_overhead;
> 
> May need to check against 'dev_info.max_rx_pktlen', if the 'max_rx_pkt_len' is
> bigger than this, it will fail in next configure.
> 
> Also some divers already does this in PMD code, should we clean that code or not
> is a question.
> 
The snippset is adjusted as follows:

if (mtu > RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN - eth_overhead && dev_info.rx_offload_capa & 
DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME) {
	rte_port->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads |= 			
                                          DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME;
	rte_port->dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len = mtu + eth_overhead;
} else
	rte_port->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &=
					~DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME;

We only modifies the internal variables of testpmd, don't impact on the 
implementation of the driver.

Thanks for more suggestions.

Xavier

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-12  0:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-21 11:44 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] app/testpmd: fixes for testpmd application Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-01-21 11:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] app/testpmd: update Rx offload after setting MTU sccessfully Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-01-28 11:27   ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-12  0:25     ` Wei Hu (Xavier) [this message]
2020-02-13  1:52       ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-01-21 11:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] app/testpmd: fix the initial value when setting PFC Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-01-28 11:21   ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-04 18:25     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-21 11:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app/testpmd: fix uninitialized members " Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-01-28 11:21   ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-04 18:25     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-04 18:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] app/testpmd: fixes for testpmd application Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a680d099-6675-54c5-7466-a25efea684b7@chinasoftinc.com \
    --to=huwei013@chinasoftinc.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git