* [PATCH] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker
@ 2023-12-19 16:40 Vipin Varghese
2024-02-23 9:45 ` fengchengwen
2024-03-06 15:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Vipin Varghese
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Vipin Varghese @ 2023-12-19 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, stable, honest.jiang, gmuthukrishn, ferruh.yigit
Modify the user display data with total average latency per worker.
Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
---
app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
index 9b1f58c78c..8b6886af62 100644
--- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
+++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
@@ -470,7 +470,8 @@ mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma)
bandwidth_total += bandwidth;
avg_cycles_total += avg_cycles;
}
- printf("\nTotal Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n", bandwidth_total, mops_total);
+ printf("\nAverage Cycles/op: %.2lf, Total Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n",
+ (float) avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
snprintf(output_str[MAX_WORKER_NB], MAX_OUTPUT_STR_LEN, CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT,
cfg->scenario_id, nr_buf, memory * nb_workers,
avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker
2023-12-19 16:40 [PATCH] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker Vipin Varghese
@ 2024-02-23 9:45 ` fengchengwen
2024-02-27 9:50 ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-02-28 3:05 ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-03-06 15:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Vipin Varghese
1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: fengchengwen @ 2024-02-23 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vipin Varghese, dev, stable, honest.jiang, gmuthukrishn, ferruh.yigit
Hi Vipin,
On 2023/12/20 0:40, Vipin Varghese wrote:
> Modify the user display data with total average latency per worker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
> ---
> app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> index 9b1f58c78c..8b6886af62 100644
> --- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> @@ -470,7 +470,8 @@ mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma)
> bandwidth_total += bandwidth;
> avg_cycles_total += avg_cycles;
> }
> - printf("\nTotal Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n", bandwidth_total, mops_total);
> + printf("\nAverage Cycles/op: %.2lf, Total Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n",
> + (float) avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
Because this is total stats, suggest add Total prefix, e.g. "Total Average Cycles/op"
I think print format keep one-digit precision is enough. Also please modify CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT
make sure the csv also have same precision of Cycles/op.
Thanks
> snprintf(output_str[MAX_WORKER_NB], MAX_OUTPUT_STR_LEN, CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT,
> cfg->scenario_id, nr_buf, memory * nb_workers,
> avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker
2024-02-23 9:45 ` fengchengwen
@ 2024-02-27 9:50 ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-02-27 13:09 ` fengchengwen
2024-02-28 3:05 ` Varghese, Vipin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Varghese, Vipin @ 2024-02-27 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fengchengwen, dev, stable, honest.jiang, gmuthukrishn, ferruh.yigit
On 2/23/2024 3:15 PM, fengchengwen wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> Hi Vipin,
>
> On 2023/12/20 0:40, Vipin Varghese wrote:
>> Modify the user display data with total average latency per worker.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
>> ---
>> app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
>> index 9b1f58c78c..8b6886af62 100644
>> --- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
>> +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
>> @@ -470,7 +470,8 @@ mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma)
>> bandwidth_total += bandwidth;
>> avg_cycles_total += avg_cycles;
>> }
>> - printf("\nTotal Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n", bandwidth_total, mops_total);
>> + printf("\nAverage Cycles/op: %.2lf, Total Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n",
>> + (float) avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
thanks for the suggestions, please find my observations below
> Because this is total stats, suggest add Total prefix, e.g. "Total Average Cycles/op"
I did not follow this, so please let me try to explain my understanding.
For `n` operation we count the average cycles, then
we add the cycles to form `total average cycles`; this is then divide by
`n` operations. Making this per operation what is the
average cycles taken for the round trip time. Hence `Total Average
Cyeles/op` does not sound right, but `Average Cycles / op` does.
> I think print format keep one-digit precision is enough. Also please modify CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT
> make sure the csv also have same precision of Cycles/op.
We have checked the CSV formatting a find
1. the precision for average cycle/op is 2 digits precision.
2. already the CVS format has average cycles/op integrated.
Hence no change is required.
>
> Thanks
>
>> snprintf(output_str[MAX_WORKER_NB], MAX_OUTPUT_STR_LEN, CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT,
>> cfg->scenario_id, nr_buf, memory * nb_workers,
>> avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker
2024-02-27 9:50 ` Varghese, Vipin
@ 2024-02-27 13:09 ` fengchengwen
2024-02-28 3:06 ` Varghese, Vipin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: fengchengwen @ 2024-02-27 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Varghese, Vipin, dev, stable, honest.jiang, gmuthukrishn, ferruh.yigit
Hi Vipin,
On 2024/2/27 17:50, Varghese, Vipin wrote:
>
> On 2/23/2024 3:15 PM, fengchengwen wrote:
>> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>>
>>
>> Hi Vipin,
>>
>> On 2023/12/20 0:40, Vipin Varghese wrote:
>>> Modify the user display data with total average latency per worker.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
>>> index 9b1f58c78c..8b6886af62 100644
>>> --- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
>>> +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
>>> @@ -470,7 +470,8 @@ mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma)
>>> bandwidth_total += bandwidth;
>>> avg_cycles_total += avg_cycles;
>>> }
>>> - printf("\nTotal Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n", bandwidth_total, mops_total);
>>> + printf("\nAverage Cycles/op: %.2lf, Total Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n",
>>> + (float) avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
>
> thanks for the suggestions, please find my observations below
>
>> Because this is total stats, suggest add Total prefix, e.g. "Total Average Cycles/op"
> I did not follow this, so please let me try to explain my understanding. For `n` operation we count the average cycles, then
> we add the cycles to form `total average cycles`; this is then divide by `n` operations. Making this per operation what is the
> average cycles taken for the round trip time. Hence `Total Average Cyeles/op` does not sound right, but `Average Cycles / op` does.
OK
My intention was to differentiate (since they have the same beginning).
>> I think print format keep one-digit precision is enough. Also please modify CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT
>> make sure the csv also have same precision of Cycles/op.
>
> We have checked the CSV formatting a find
> 1. the precision for average cycle/op is 2 digits precision.
> 2. already the CVS format has average cycles/op integrated.
>
> Hence no change is required.
It's weird.
We can see more clear when add together:
#define CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT "Scenario %u Summary, , , , , ,%u,%.2lf,%u,%.3lf,%.3lf\n"
snprintf(output_str[MAX_WORKER_NB], MAX_OUTPUT_STR_LEN, CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT,
cfg->scenario_id, nr_buf, memory * nb_workers,
avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
The bandwidth_total, mops_total both are float, which take last two "%.31f", then "%u" is for "avg_cycles_total / nb_workers"
Also, avg_cycles_total / nb_workers both are u32, and its result is u32 if not with force convert.
You could modify with "avg_cycles_total*1.0 / nb_workers", then compile will output warning:
[2035/3727] Compiling C object app/dpdk-test-dma-perf.p/test-dma-perf_benchmark.c.o
../../dpdk/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c: In function ‘mem_copy_benchmark’:
../../dpdk/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c:26:28: warning: format ‘%u’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 7 has type ‘double’ [-Wformat=]
#define CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT "Scenario %u Summary, , , , , ,%u,%.2lf,%u,%.3lf,%.3lf\n"
Thanks
^
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>> snprintf(output_str[MAX_WORKER_NB], MAX_OUTPUT_STR_LEN, CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT,
>>> cfg->scenario_id, nr_buf, memory * nb_workers,
>>> avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
>>>
> .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker
2024-02-23 9:45 ` fengchengwen
2024-02-27 9:50 ` Varghese, Vipin
@ 2024-02-28 3:05 ` Varghese, Vipin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Varghese, Vipin @ 2024-02-28 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fengchengwen, dev, stable, honest.jiang, gmuthukrishn, ferruh.yigit
On 2/23/2024 3:15 PM, fengchengwen wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> Hi Vipin,
>
> On 2023/12/20 0:40, Vipin Varghese wrote:
>> Modify the user display data with total average latency per worker.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
>> ---
>> app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
>> index 9b1f58c78c..8b6886af62 100644
>> --- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
>> +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
>> @@ -470,7 +470,8 @@ mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma)
>> bandwidth_total += bandwidth;
>> avg_cycles_total += avg_cycles;
>> }
>> - printf("\nTotal Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n", bandwidth_total, mops_total);
>> + printf("\nAverage Cycles/op: %.2lf, Total Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n",
>> + (float) avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
> Because this is total stats, suggest add Total prefix, e.g. "Total Average Cycles/op"
>
> I think print format keep one-digit precision is enough. Also please modify CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT
> make sure the csv also have same precision of Cycles/op.
Thank you Chengwen, let me share v2 shortly.
>
> Thanks
>
>> snprintf(output_str[MAX_WORKER_NB], MAX_OUTPUT_STR_LEN, CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT,
>> cfg->scenario_id, nr_buf, memory * nb_workers,
>> avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker
2024-02-27 13:09 ` fengchengwen
@ 2024-02-28 3:06 ` Varghese, Vipin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Varghese, Vipin @ 2024-02-28 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fengchengwen, dev, stable, honest.jiang, gmuthukrishn, ferruh.yigit
On 2/27/2024 6:39 PM, fengchengwen wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> Hi Vipin,
>
> On 2024/2/27 17:50, Varghese, Vipin wrote:
>> On 2/23/2024 3:15 PM, fengchengwen wrote:
>>> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Vipin,
>>>
>>> On 2023/12/20 0:40, Vipin Varghese wrote:
>>>> Modify the user display data with total average latency per worker.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 3 ++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
>>>> index 9b1f58c78c..8b6886af62 100644
>>>> --- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
>>>> +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
>>>> @@ -470,7 +470,8 @@ mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma)
>>>> bandwidth_total += bandwidth;
>>>> avg_cycles_total += avg_cycles;
>>>> }
>>>> - printf("\nTotal Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n", bandwidth_total, mops_total);
>>>> + printf("\nAverage Cycles/op: %.2lf, Total Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n",
>>>> + (float) avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
>> thanks for the suggestions, please find my observations below
>>
>>> Because this is total stats, suggest add Total prefix, e.g. "Total Average Cycles/op"
>> I did not follow this, so please let me try to explain my understanding. For `n` operation we count the average cycles, then
>> we add the cycles to form `total average cycles`; this is then divide by `n` operations. Making this per operation what is the
>> average cycles taken for the round trip time. Hence `Total Average Cyeles/op` does not sound right, but `Average Cycles / op` does.
> OK
> My intention was to differentiate (since they have the same beginning).
>
>>> I think print format keep one-digit precision is enough. Also please modify CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT
>>> make sure the csv also have same precision of Cycles/op.
>> We have checked the CSV formatting a find
>> 1. the precision for average cycle/op is 2 digits precision.
>> 2. already the CVS format has average cycles/op integrated.
>>
>> Hence no change is required.
> It's weird.
>
> We can see more clear when add together:
> #define CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT "Scenario %u Summary, , , , , ,%u,%.2lf,%u,%.3lf,%.3lf\n"
> snprintf(output_str[MAX_WORKER_NB], MAX_OUTPUT_STR_LEN, CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT,
> cfg->scenario_id, nr_buf, memory * nb_workers,
> avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
> The bandwidth_total, mops_total both are float, which take last two "%.31f", then "%u" is for "avg_cycles_total / nb_workers"
>
> Also, avg_cycles_total / nb_workers both are u32, and its result is u32 if not with force convert.
>
> You could modify with "avg_cycles_total*1.0 / nb_workers", then compile will output warning:
>
> [2035/3727] Compiling C object app/dpdk-test-dma-perf.p/test-dma-perf_benchmark.c.o
> ../../dpdk/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c: In function ‘mem_copy_benchmark’:
> ../../dpdk/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c:26:28: warning: format ‘%u’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 7 has type ‘double’ [-Wformat=]
> #define CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT "Scenario %u Summary, , , , , ,%u,%.2lf,%u,%.3lf,%.3lf\n"
thank you Chengwen, let me share v2 for this patch with both print and
csv in same format.
>
> Thanks
> ^
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>> snprintf(output_str[MAX_WORKER_NB], MAX_OUTPUT_STR_LEN, CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT,
>>>> cfg->scenario_id, nr_buf, memory * nb_workers,
>>>> avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
>>>>
>> .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker
2023-12-19 16:40 [PATCH] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker Vipin Varghese
2024-02-23 9:45 ` fengchengwen
@ 2024-03-06 15:06 ` Vipin Varghese
2024-03-08 1:15 ` fengchengwen
2024-03-08 19:06 ` [PATCH v3] " Vipin Varghese
1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Vipin Varghese @ 2024-03-06 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, fengchengwen; +Cc: ferruh.yigit, neerav.parikh
Modify the user display data with total average latency per worker.
Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
V2 Changes:
- keep one-digit precision is enough, suggested by Chengwen
---
app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
index 9b1f58c78c..2e110d0d98 100644
--- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
+++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
@@ -470,7 +470,8 @@ mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma)
bandwidth_total += bandwidth;
avg_cycles_total += avg_cycles;
}
- printf("\nTotal Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n", bandwidth_total, mops_total);
+ printf("\nAverage Cycles/op per worker: %.1f, Total Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n",
+ (avg_cycles_total * (float) 1.0) / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
snprintf(output_str[MAX_WORKER_NB], MAX_OUTPUT_STR_LEN, CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT,
cfg->scenario_id, nr_buf, memory * nb_workers,
avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker
2024-03-06 15:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Vipin Varghese
@ 2024-03-08 1:15 ` fengchengwen
2024-03-08 2:39 ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-03-08 19:06 ` [PATCH v3] " Vipin Varghese
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: fengchengwen @ 2024-03-08 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vipin Varghese, dev; +Cc: ferruh.yigit, neerav.parikh
Hi Vipin,
On 2024/3/6 23:06, Vipin Varghese wrote:
> Modify the user display data with total average latency per worker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
>
> V2 Changes:
> - keep one-digit precision is enough, suggested by Chengwen
> ---
> app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> index 9b1f58c78c..2e110d0d98 100644
> --- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> @@ -470,7 +470,8 @@ mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma)
> bandwidth_total += bandwidth;
> avg_cycles_total += avg_cycles;
> }
> - printf("\nTotal Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n", bandwidth_total, mops_total);
> + printf("\nAverage Cycles/op per worker: %.1f, Total Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n",
> + (avg_cycles_total * (float) 1.0) / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
> snprintf(output_str[MAX_WORKER_NB], MAX_OUTPUT_STR_LEN, CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT,
> cfg->scenario_id, nr_buf, memory * nb_workers,
> avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
As previous mentioned, please make sure the csv format and the above snprintf also modified (make sure stdout and csv has the same value).
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker
2024-03-08 1:15 ` fengchengwen
@ 2024-03-08 2:39 ` Varghese, Vipin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Varghese, Vipin @ 2024-03-08 2:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fengchengwen, dev; +Cc: ferruh.yigit, neerav.parikh
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 892 bytes --]
<snipped>
>> - printf("\nTotal Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n", bandwidth_total, mops_total);
>> + printf("\nAverage Cycles/op per worker: %.1f, Total Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n",
>> + (avg_cycles_total * (float) 1.0) / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
>> snprintf(output_str[MAX_WORKER_NB], MAX_OUTPUT_STR_LEN, CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT,
>> cfg->scenario_id, nr_buf, memory * nb_workers,
>> avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
> As previous mentioned, please make sure the csv format and the above snprintf also modified (make sure stdout and csv has the same value).
Hi Chengwen, the CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT already has `Cycles/op` with `%u`. I
think you are asking to convert this to `%0.1f`to keep it same as `printf`.
Sure I will share v3 for the same.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1698 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker
2024-03-06 15:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Vipin Varghese
2024-03-08 1:15 ` fengchengwen
@ 2024-03-08 19:06 ` Vipin Varghese
2024-03-12 1:53 ` fengchengwen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Vipin Varghese @ 2024-03-08 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, fengchengwen; +Cc: ferruh.yigit, neerav.parikh
Modify the user information with total average latency per worker
in both CSV and console logs.
Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
V3 Changes:
- update CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT to change Avg Cycles / op per worker
V2 Changes:
- keep one-digit precision is enough, suggested by Chengwen
---
app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
index 9b1f58c78c..fca3ba24f7 100644
--- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
+++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
#define CSV_LINE_DMA_FMT "Scenario %u,%u,%s,%u,%u,%u,%u,%.2lf,%" PRIu64 ",%.3lf,%.3lf\n"
#define CSV_LINE_CPU_FMT "Scenario %u,%u,NA,NA,NA,%u,%u,%.2lf,%" PRIu64 ",%.3lf,%.3lf\n"
-#define CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT "Scenario %u Summary, , , , , ,%u,%.2lf,%u,%.3lf,%.3lf\n"
+#define CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT "Scenario %u Summary, , , , , ,%u,%.2lf,%.1lf,%.3lf,%.3lf\n"
struct worker_info {
bool ready_flag;
@@ -470,10 +470,11 @@ mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma)
bandwidth_total += bandwidth;
avg_cycles_total += avg_cycles;
}
- printf("\nTotal Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n", bandwidth_total, mops_total);
+ printf("\nAverage Cycles/op per worker: %.1lf, Total Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n",
+ (avg_cycles_total * (float) 1.0) / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
snprintf(output_str[MAX_WORKER_NB], MAX_OUTPUT_STR_LEN, CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT,
cfg->scenario_id, nr_buf, memory * nb_workers,
- avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
+ (avg_cycles_total * (float) 1.0) / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
out:
/* free mbufs used in the test */
--
2.39.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker
2024-03-08 19:06 ` [PATCH v3] " Vipin Varghese
@ 2024-03-12 1:53 ` fengchengwen
2024-03-18 2:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: fengchengwen @ 2024-03-12 1:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vipin Varghese, dev; +Cc: ferruh.yigit, neerav.parikh
Acked-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
On 2024/3/9 3:06, Vipin Varghese wrote:
> Modify the user information with total average latency per worker
> in both CSV and console logs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
>
> V3 Changes:
> - update CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT to change Avg Cycles / op per worker
>
> V2 Changes:
> - keep one-digit precision is enough, suggested by Chengwen
> ---
> app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> index 9b1f58c78c..fca3ba24f7 100644
> --- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
> #define CSV_LINE_DMA_FMT "Scenario %u,%u,%s,%u,%u,%u,%u,%.2lf,%" PRIu64 ",%.3lf,%.3lf\n"
> #define CSV_LINE_CPU_FMT "Scenario %u,%u,NA,NA,NA,%u,%u,%.2lf,%" PRIu64 ",%.3lf,%.3lf\n"
>
> -#define CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT "Scenario %u Summary, , , , , ,%u,%.2lf,%u,%.3lf,%.3lf\n"
> +#define CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT "Scenario %u Summary, , , , , ,%u,%.2lf,%.1lf,%.3lf,%.3lf\n"
>
> struct worker_info {
> bool ready_flag;
> @@ -470,10 +470,11 @@ mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma)
> bandwidth_total += bandwidth;
> avg_cycles_total += avg_cycles;
> }
> - printf("\nTotal Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n", bandwidth_total, mops_total);
> + printf("\nAverage Cycles/op per worker: %.1lf, Total Bandwidth: %.3lf Gbps, Total MOps: %.3lf\n",
> + (avg_cycles_total * (float) 1.0) / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
> snprintf(output_str[MAX_WORKER_NB], MAX_OUTPUT_STR_LEN, CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT,
> cfg->scenario_id, nr_buf, memory * nb_workers,
> - avg_cycles_total / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
> + (avg_cycles_total * (float) 1.0) / nb_workers, bandwidth_total, mops_total);
>
> out:
> /* free mbufs used in the test */
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker
2024-03-12 1:53 ` fengchengwen
@ 2024-03-18 2:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2024-03-18 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vipin Varghese; +Cc: dev, ferruh.yigit, neerav.parikh, fengchengwen
12/03/2024 02:53, fengchengwen:
> On 2024/3/9 3:06, Vipin Varghese wrote:
> > Modify the user information with total average latency per worker
> > in both CSV and console logs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
> >
> > V3 Changes:
> > - update CSV_TOTAL_LINE_FMT to change Avg Cycles / op per worker
> >
> > V2 Changes:
> > - keep one-digit precision is enough, suggested by Chengwen
The changelog should not appear in git so it must be below the 3 dashes.
> > ---
> > app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Applied, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-18 2:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-19 16:40 [PATCH] app/dma-perf: add average latency per worker Vipin Varghese
2024-02-23 9:45 ` fengchengwen
2024-02-27 9:50 ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-02-27 13:09 ` fengchengwen
2024-02-28 3:06 ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-02-28 3:05 ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-03-06 15:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Vipin Varghese
2024-03-08 1:15 ` fengchengwen
2024-03-08 2:39 ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-03-08 19:06 ` [PATCH v3] " Vipin Varghese
2024-03-12 1:53 ` fengchengwen
2024-03-18 2:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).