From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326A3A0C4D; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:27:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A10406A3; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:27:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E28A40687 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:27:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Gv8zB2y7SzYt7f; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:27:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.103.128] (10.67.103.128) by dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.8; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:27:34 +0800 To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "Singh, Aman Deep" <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> CC: <dev@dpdk.org>, <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>, <david.marchand@redhat.com>, Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>, Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>, <viacheslavo@nvidia.com> References: <1615430867-29992-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> <92cc355e-11b4-ee4a-6bf1-b24ae3e97aa6@huawei.com> <8c19d53d-b41d-0248-ea67-1cdbf8109829@huawei.com> <67831084.ROoOdahRhB@thomas> <5bfeabc0-f0b0-87af-8664-437ae9bed345@intel.com> <c4905164-62d8-384b-452e-b71af895d42d@intel.com> From: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com> Message-ID: <a6cc66a0-252a-a017-c620-5f7a3ca6dbb9@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:27:34 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <c4905164-62d8-384b-452e-b71af895d42d@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.103.128] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.102) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v16] app/testpmd: support multi-process X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Thanks Ferruh, I will handle it as quickly as possible. 在 2021/8/24 20:18, Ferruh Yigit 写道: > On 8/16/2021 7:12 PM, Singh, Aman Deep wrote: >> >> On 8/2/2021 1:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> 02/08/2021 03:51, Min Hu (Connor): >>>> 在 2021/7/26 15:28, Min Hu (Connor) 写道: >>>>> 在 2021/7/26 14:30, Thomas Monjalon 写道: >>>>>> 26/07/2021 02:26, Min Hu (Connor): >>>>>>> 在 2021/7/24 19:45, Thomas Monjalon 写道: >>>>>>>> 10/07/2021 05:50, Min Hu (Connor): >>>>>>>>> This patch adds multi-process support for testpmd. >>>>>>>>> For example the following commands run two testpmd >>>>>>>>> processes: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * the primary process: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 0-1 -- -i \ >>>>>>>>> --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * the secondary process: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 2-3 -- -i \ >>>>>>>>> --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com> >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com> >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <Andrew.Rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> >>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com> >>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> >>>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> V16: >>>>>>>>> * revert unrelated changes. >>>>>>>>> * add some restrictions in doc. >>>>>>>> I didn't see clear agreement to integrate this feature in DPDK 21.08. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BTW, the testpmd maintainer was not Cc'ed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, Thomas, >>>>>>> This patch has two "acked" and one "reviewed-by". >>>>>>> And Xiaoyun Li is the maintainer, I has already Cc'ed to him/her, >>>>>>> please check it out, thanks. >>>>>> Andrew's comment from v15: >>>>>> " >>>>>> IMHO, as I state above, current state is insufficient to >>>>>> consider is a start point to be applied. >>>>>> " >>>>> Hi, Andrew, Thomos, >>>>> What is the least thing should be done for this patch to >>>>> meet the state sufficient to be applied? >>>> Hi, all, >>>> How about this patch, could it be applied? >>> I was not confident enough to apply it in 21.08. >>> When others will be back, we'll discuss it again for 21.11. >>> >> For 21.11 release. >> >> Acked-by: Aman Deep Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com> >> > > Hi Connor, > > Can you please rebase it to latest dpdk (v21.11-rc0) so we can proceed with it? > > I am for getting the patch as early as possible in the release cycle, specially > before it is getting busy for -rc1. > > Thanks, > ferruh > . >