From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BAAA04DD; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:12:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2FDF3E; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:12:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90350DED for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:12:31 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: U6LJG73hJlVi4afaCMMR82mo8SbH4g0QRyMas5J0fQ1v60pQFgKTvnGtOB9pKfy6qLlnISxAgr XLB+T+HkA+hg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9810"; a="171423277" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,353,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="171423277" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Nov 2020 09:12:28 -0800 IronPort-SDR: waF0+EsLfcXWiKT8UJqIbKXt1f4hErOTw9GrQIJrEAQIpO5kkETdLqYqyu6njQcLjyOPqcO0Is /xdk2QEgTN0Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,353,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="360082730" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.20.82]) ([10.252.20.82]) by fmsmga004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Nov 2020 09:12:27 -0800 To: Ajit Khaparde , dev@dpdk.org References: <20201117051049.45891-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Cc: Thomas Monjalon , David Marchand From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 17:12:23 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201117051049.45891-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: update the OS versions X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 11/17/2020 5:10 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote: > Update the OS versions. Remove some old OS versions. > > Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde > --- > doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst b/doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst > index d9a7d87930..898c71ef1e 100644 > --- a/doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/nics/bnxt.rst > @@ -29,17 +29,16 @@ Operating Systems supported: > > * Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.1 (Ootpa) > * Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.0 (Ootpa) > +* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.8 (Maipo) > * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) > * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.6 (Maipo) > * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.5 (Maipo) > -* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.4 (Maipo) > -* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.3 (Maipo) > -* Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.2 (Maipo) > +* CentOS Linux release 8.1 > * CentOS Linux release 8.0 > +* CentOS Linux release 7.8 > * CentOS Linux release 7.7 > * CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 > * CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 > -* CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 > * Fedora 31 > * FreeBSD 12.1 > * Suse 15SP1 > @@ -47,7 +46,6 @@ Operating Systems supported: > * Ubuntu 18.04 > * Ubuntu 16.10 > * Ubuntu 16.04 > -* Ubuntu 14.04 > Should we keep the supported OS list per PMD? I think other-way around makes more sense, to document if a DPDK supported OS is not supporting this particular PMD. If the intention is to document the tested platforms with this device, I think you are already documenting it in the release notes.