From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FB398
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:28:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32])
 by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Feb 2017 03:28:12 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,165,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="65423408"
Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.137])
 ([10.237.220.137])
 by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Feb 2017 03:28:11 -0800
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
References: <20170214151326.7554-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
 <20170215021122.GW20916@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <56b87137-6dd2-717c-b7bc-c55663c8c71f@intel.com> <19837397.b49UENGBL6@xps13>
Cc: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
 "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Message-ID: <aa523134-e338-09b1-7601-dbdf53caad62@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:28:11 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <19837397.b49UENGBL6@xps13>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 17.05] test: move tests to separate folder
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:28:14 -0000

On 2/15/2017 11:16 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2017-02-15 10:06, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 2/15/2017 2:11 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 05:30:14PM +0000, Richardson, Bruce wrote:
>>>> Just to be awkward :-), one last question: Why separate building and running
>>>> the tests? My suggestion would be to have "make test" both build and run the
>>>> tests. If there is no work to do in building them, then the time cost of the
>>>> extra empty build is negligible compared to the time taken to actually run
>>>> the tests.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>
>> Makes sense. I will update as:
>>
>> "make test" -> compile and run test
>> "make test_build" -> only compile test
> 
> If I remember well, the dash is used in some make targets, not the underscore.

Both usage exists, but if dash is the preferred way I will use it, rule
will become "test-build"