From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEA0A0A0E;
	Thu,  4 Feb 2021 07:57:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4478F24056C;
	Thu,  4 Feb 2021 07:57:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.190])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CACF240569
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  4 Feb 2021 07:57:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59])
 by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DWTpS2CSYz1641L;
 Thu,  4 Feb 2021 14:55:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.67.103.119] (10.67.103.119) by
 DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server id
 14.3.498.0; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:56:58 +0800
From: oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, Thomas Monjalon
 <thomas@monjalon.net>
CC: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, <linuxarm@openeuler.org>
Message-ID: <ab53c8ff-a453-5125-2748-463ea94f9bbc@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:56:58 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.67.103.119]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [dpdk-dev] =?utf-8?q?=E3=80=90Some_Questions_About_Multi-Process?=
 =?utf-8?q?_Resource_Cleaning=E3=80=91?=
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi, Thomas Monjalon&Ferruh Yigit and others

     I'm analyzing multiprocess with eal. I have some questions I'd like 
to ask you.

Firstly, After the rte_eal_init() command is executed, the master and 
slave processes are started successfully.

and traffic is continuously sent using the tester.If you run the kill -9 
command to stop the slave process, restart the re-process, and start 
packet receiving and sending,

how to ensure that the eal resource of the slave process is cleaned up?

Second, how to invoke the remove function to clear probe resources of 
the slave process after the slave process exits?

Finally, I found out why the rte_eal_cleanup call was not unregistered 
mp action after the process exited.

I look forward to your response.


Thanks

Lijun Ou