From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF195A44; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:26:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2017 07:26:52 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,346,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="51817919" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.38]) ([10.237.220.38]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2017 07:26:51 -0800 To: "Iremonger, Bernard" , "Lu, Wenzhuo" , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <1484102853-53205-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C224D1CB14@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C224D1CCE7@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Cc: "Wu, Jingjing" , "stable@dpdk.org" From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:26:51 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C224D1CCE7@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix ixgbe private API calling X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:26:54 -0000 On 1/11/2017 3:20 PM, Iremonger, Bernard wrote: > Hi Wenzhuo, > > >>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix ixgbe private API calling >>> >>> Some ixgbe private APIs are added to expose ixgbe specific functions. >>> When they're used by testpmd, there's no check for if the NICs are ixgbe. >>> Other NICs also have chance to call these APIs. >>> This patch add the check and the feedback print. >> >> I am not sure that testpmd is the right place to do this. >> The rte_pmd_ixgbe_* functions are public API's which can be called by other >> applications. >> The checks should be in the rte_pmd_ixgbe_* API's > > It is useful to handle the return code -ENOTSUP in testpmd. > Makes sense, and I think it is good idea to add them in your patch, since it introduces returning -ENOTSUP, would you mind sending a new version of your patch with this update? So we can drop this patch completely. Thanks, ferruh