From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4185A045E for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:34:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165E41B9ED; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:31:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466A01B9D7 for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:31:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 May 2019 09:31:45 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from silpixa00399498.ir.intel.com (HELO silpixa00399498.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.237.223.125]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 May 2019 09:31:43 -0700 From: Anatoly Burakov To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Olivier Matz , Andrew Rybchenko , stephen@networkplumber.org, thomas@monjalon.net, david.marchand@redhat.com Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 17:31:03 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 17/25] mempool: use new tailq locking API X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Replace usages of direct access to shared memory config with calls to the new API. Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov --- lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c index 69bd2a65c..aacfdafdd 100644 --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c @@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ rte_mempool_free(struct rte_mempool *mp) return; mempool_list = RTE_TAILQ_CAST(rte_mempool_tailq.head, rte_mempool_list); - rte_rwlock_write_lock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_eal_mcfg_tailq_write_lock(); /* find out tailq entry */ TAILQ_FOREACH(te, mempool_list, next) { if (te->data == (void *)mp) @@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ rte_mempool_free(struct rte_mempool *mp) TAILQ_REMOVE(mempool_list, te, next); rte_free(te); } - rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_eal_mcfg_tailq_write_unlock(); rte_mempool_free_memchunks(mp); rte_mempool_ops_free(mp); @@ -898,9 +898,9 @@ rte_mempool_create_empty(const char *name, unsigned n, unsigned elt_size, te->data = mp; - rte_rwlock_write_lock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_eal_mcfg_tailq_write_lock(); TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(mempool_list, te, next); - rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_eal_mcfg_tailq_write_unlock(); rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_MEMPOOL_RWLOCK); return mp; -- 2.17.1