From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880BB41D3B; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:56:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DDC42F82; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:56:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F4A42DBA for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:56:37 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1677063397; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lWxApwEUqBptfRSk/ZhijYL1pgpiirCnhUOA2Viduv0=; b=SydlAmFFUmFQCHoN8WPcnr2dgerENJu9LuLOuA2qjKaObrVk3MNIl/WUTGDuriHVxW+3mY h2CkQx3EqOxQhaYmiAM/wYJGn7fe7tYjC+QuZSAlmOxjmvYsaZeqJwx7FTJq2MNiJfghF9 JGDFWMVo8O8QaBkK6tqfUudgBpJqzzM= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-342-meKilmTTMNC0ZkpFaR9x8g-1; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 05:56:31 -0500 X-MC-Unique: meKilmTTMNC0ZkpFaR9x8g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69AE33823A06; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.21] (unknown [10.39.208.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 307AB1121314; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:56:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/16] test/bbdev: use mbuf reset function To: Hernan Vargas , dev@dpdk.org, gakhil@marvell.com, trix@redhat.com Cc: nicolas.chautru@intel.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com References: <20230215170949.60569-1-hernan.vargas@intel.com> <20230215170949.60569-15-hernan.vargas@intel.com> From: Maxime Coquelin In-Reply-To: <20230215170949.60569-15-hernan.vargas@intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.3 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 2/15/23 18:09, Hernan Vargas wrote: > Use mbuf_reset function for code consistency. > No functional impact. > > Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas > --- > app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c > index 5259404ff6..535b9d73dd 100644 > --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c > +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c > @@ -3173,11 +3173,11 @@ throughput_intr_lcore_ldpc_dec(void *arg) > for (j = 0; j < TEST_REPETITIONS; ++j) { > for (i = 0; i < num_to_process; ++i) { > if (!loopback) > - rte_pktmbuf_reset(ops[i]->ldpc_dec.hard_output.data); > + mbuf_reset(ops[i]->ldpc_dec.hard_output.data); > if (hc_out || loopback) > mbuf_reset(ops[i]->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.data); > if (ops[i]->ldpc_dec.soft_output.data != NULL) > - rte_pktmbuf_reset(ops[i]->ldpc_dec.soft_output.data); > + mbuf_reset(ops[i]->ldpc_dec.soft_output.data); > } > > tp->start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise(); > @@ -3267,9 +3267,9 @@ throughput_intr_lcore_dec(void *arg) > > for (j = 0; j < TEST_REPETITIONS; ++j) { > for (i = 0; i < num_to_process; ++i) { > - rte_pktmbuf_reset(ops[i]->turbo_dec.hard_output.data); > + mbuf_reset(ops[i]->turbo_dec.hard_output.data); > if (ops[i]->turbo_dec.soft_output.data != NULL) > - rte_pktmbuf_reset(ops[i]->turbo_dec.soft_output.data); > + mbuf_reset(ops[i]->turbo_dec.soft_output.data); > } > > tp->start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise(); > @@ -3356,7 +3356,7 @@ throughput_intr_lcore_enc(void *arg) > > for (j = 0; j < TEST_REPETITIONS; ++j) { > for (i = 0; i < num_to_process; ++i) > - rte_pktmbuf_reset(ops[i]->turbo_enc.output.data); > + mbuf_reset(ops[i]->turbo_enc.output.data); > > tp->start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise(); > for (enqueued = 0; enqueued < num_to_process;) { > @@ -3444,7 +3444,7 @@ throughput_intr_lcore_ldpc_enc(void *arg) > > for (j = 0; j < TEST_REPETITIONS; ++j) { > for (i = 0; i < num_to_process; ++i) > - rte_pktmbuf_reset(ops[i]->turbo_enc.output.data); > + mbuf_reset(ops[i]->turbo_enc.output.data); > > tp->start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise(); > for (enqueued = 0; enqueued < num_to_process;) { > @@ -3532,7 +3532,7 @@ throughput_intr_lcore_fft(void *arg) > > for (j = 0; j < TEST_REPETITIONS; ++j) { > for (i = 0; i < num_to_process; ++i) > - rte_pktmbuf_reset(ops[i]->fft.base_output.data); > + mbuf_reset(ops[i]->fft.base_output.data); > > tp->start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise(); > for (enqueued = 0; enqueued < num_to_process;) { Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin Thanks, Maxime