DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: 912873551@qq.com, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: jim@netgate.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 回复: About the shared flock for hugepage files
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:05:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad6be17b-3d71-c928-cd39-9ae496d456cf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_FC289A9347E94187C113AA4D889A13644C05@qq.com>

Hi Bakari,

On 12-Sep-17 4:41 AM, 912873551 at qq.com (白长敏) wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> 
> 
> Thank you for reply, i understand it, but i still have two doubts.
> 
> 
> 1) if i have > 1 DPDK application on a machine, i can use the parameter "--file-prefix" to distinguish, it can work even if have not flock.

That's not entirely correct. DPDK will attempt to clean up *all* 
hugepage files it encounters, not just those that are designated as "its 
own" via the --file-prefix [1]. This is because hugepages are not freed 
back to the OS unless its backing file in hugetlbfs is removed from the 
system, so DPDK needs to clear out any pre-existing hugepage files in 
order to successfully allocate any hugepages for its use.

> 2) If I understand correctly, in the "map_all_hugepages()", after making the shared flock, close(fd), that is to free the flock. Then, in the "clear_hugedir()", it equal to have not flock ?

You are correct that normally, closing the file descriptor would release 
the lock. However, we're also doing an mmap() call on that fd [2], which 
duplicates the descriptor, and therefore we continue to hold a lock to 
that file.

Quote from mmap() man page [3]:

"The mmap() function shall add an extra reference to the file associated 
with the file descriptor fildes which is not removed by a subsequent 
close() on that file descriptor. This reference shall be removed when 
there are no more mappings to the file."

[1] 
http://www.dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_hugepage_info.c#n192
[2] 
http://www.dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c#n505
[3] https://linux.die.net/man/3/mmap

> 
> 
> ------------------ ???? ------------------
> ???: "Jim Thompson";<jim at netgate.com>;
> ????: 2017?9?12?(???) ??11:10
> ???: "???"<912873551 at qq.com>;
> ??: "dev"<dev at dpdk.org>;
> ??: Re: [dpdk-dev] About the shared flock for hugepage files
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Bakari,
> 
> 
> This is so you can have > 1 DPDK application on a machine and they won't use each other's hugepages.
> 
> 
> See, for example the comments in clear_hugedir()
> 
> 
> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_hugepage_info.c#n198
> 
> 
> Jim
> 
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 9:16 PM, ??? <912873551 at qq.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi, everyone,
> 
> 
>      I'm a developer from china, now i have a problem is about the shared flock for hugepage files in the function of "map_all_hugepages()".
> 
> 
> as follows:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> /* set shared flock on the file. */
> 
> 
> if (flock(fd, LOCK_SH | LOCK_NB) == -1) {
> 
> 
>          RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "%s(): Locking file failed:%s \n", __func__, strerror(errno));
> 
> 
>          close(fd);
> 
> 
>          return i;
> 
> 
> }
> 
> 
> close(fd);
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> there, it gives a shared flock to each hugepage file in /mnt/huge, and close it right away.
> 
> 
> it makes me puzzled. Why? What doing that is for?
> 
> 
> I'm looking forward to your reply, thank you very much.
> 
> 
> best regards,
> Bakari.
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly

      reply	other threads:[~2017-09-19 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-12  2:16 [dpdk-dev] "  =?gb18030?B?sNezpMP0?=
2017-09-12  3:10 ` Jim Thompson
2017-09-12  3:41   ` [dpdk-dev] =?gb18030?b?u9i4tKO6ICBBYm91dCB0aGUgc2hhcmVkIGZsb2Nr?= =?gb18030?q?_for_hugepage_files?=  =?gb18030?B?sNezpMP0?=
2017-09-19 14:05     ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ad6be17b-3d71-c928-cd39-9ae496d456cf@intel.com \
    --to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=912873551@qq.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jim@netgate.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).