DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Montorsi, Francesco" <fmontorsi@empirix.com>
To: Ivan Boule <ivan.boule@6wind.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] where to find ethernet CRC when stripping is off
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:15:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad9b0f9d05ec428c9ea922c7a28a34d4@bilemail1.empirix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <569FAC72.3090001@6wind.com>

Hi Ivan,


> -----Original Message-----
> You would be right... if the PMDs did not transparently strip the CRC in
> software when hardware CRC stripping is disabled at port configuration (as
> described above).
> See for instance how the function ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro() in file
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c deals with crc_len.

Yeah, I see. However, I wonder what's the utility of the hw_strip_crc feature if finally it is completely masked to the mbuf user.
However, to my understanding, looking at that ixgbe code, I think that what I wrote before:

   uint32_t crc = *(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset (mymbuf, uint32_t*, mymbuf->pkt_len)) ;

should work, since the pkt_len and data_len has the "crc_len" removed, but the CRC itself should be there.
I know it is kind of an hack, but at least for ixgbe that sounds like a possible (temporary) solution for me....


> Considering your need, I think now that PMDs should keep the CRC that are
> stored in received packets when hardware CRC stripping is disabled by the
> application, so that the application can access it as needed.
> 
Yes, that would be very useful.

> Note that this would impose that the input packet processing of such DPDK
> applications be aware of the CRC presence (+4 in the packet length , for
> instance).
Or perhaps, to maintain backward compatibility, just a flag inside the mbuf could be set that informs the user that at the end of the mbuf packet, you can find 4 bytes with the CRC.

> 
> Let's see what others, if any, that might care think about such a change into
> the CRC stripping semantics.

Thanks!
Francesco

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-20 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-20 15:02 Montorsi, Francesco
2016-01-20 15:49 ` Ivan Boule
2016-01-20 17:15   ` Montorsi, Francesco [this message]
2016-01-21  8:49     ` Ivan Boule

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ad9b0f9d05ec428c9ea922c7a28a34d4@bilemail1.empirix.com \
    --to=fmontorsi@empirix.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ivan.boule@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).