Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] net/tap: move fds of Rx/Tx queues to be in process private

[Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>]

On 10/10/2018 3:39 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> fd's cannot be shared between processes, and each process need to have
> it's own fd's pointer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.h |  7 +++-
>  drivers/net/tap/tap_flow.c    |  3 +-
>  drivers/net/tap/tap_intr.c    |  5 ++-
>  4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> index edfb7da..3372d54 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> @@ -315,6 +315,7 @@ static uint16_t
>  pmd_rx_burst(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>  {
>  	struct rx_queue *rxq = queue;
> +	struct pmd_process_private *process_private;
>  	uint16_t num_rx;
>  	unsigned long num_rx_bytes = 0;
>  	uint32_t trigger = tap_trigger;
> @@ -323,6 +324,7 @@ pmd_rx_burst(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>  		return 0;
>  	if (trigger)
>  		rxq->trigger_seen = trigger;
> +	process_private = rte_eth_devices[rxq->in_port].process_private;

This patch has a dependency to [1] which is waiting for new version, right?
Please note these kind of dependencies after "---" part of the commit log.

[1]
https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/46185/