From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327F51DBD for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:41:58 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Mar 2019 09:41:57 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,498,1544515200"; d="scan'208";a="308537076" Received: from fyigit-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.46]) ([10.237.221.46]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2019 09:41:54 -0700 To: "Zhang, Qi Z" , "thomas@monjalon.net" , "Doherty, Declan" Cc: "ktraynor@redhat.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Shelton, Benjamin H" , "Vangati, Narender" References: <20180920045626.106109-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E70611532AA4B1@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <4c60c418-e653-41ec-ef09-b348dbd7d140@intel.com> <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E706115334F196@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=ferruh.yigit@intel.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFXZCFABEADCujshBOAaqPZpwShdkzkyGpJ15lmxiSr3jVMqOtQS/sB3FYLT0/d3+bvy qbL9YnlbPyRvZfnP3pXiKwkRoR1RJwEo2BOf6hxdzTmLRtGtwWzI9MwrUPj6n/ldiD58VAGQ +iR1I/z9UBUN/ZMksElA2D7Jgg7vZ78iKwNnd+vLBD6I61kVrZ45Vjo3r+pPOByUBXOUlxp9 GWEKKIrJ4eogqkVNSixN16VYK7xR+5OUkBYUO+sE6etSxCr7BahMPKxH+XPlZZjKrxciaWQb +dElz3Ab4Opl+ZT/bK2huX+W+NJBEBVzjTkhjSTjcyRdxvS1gwWRuXqAml/sh+KQjPV1PPHF YK5LcqLkle+OKTCa82OvUb7cr+ALxATIZXQkgmn+zFT8UzSS3aiBBohg3BtbTIWy51jNlYdy ezUZ4UxKSsFuUTPt+JjHQBvF7WKbmNGS3fCid5Iag4tWOfZoqiCNzxApkVugltxoc6rG2TyX CmI2rP0mQ0GOsGXA3+3c1MCdQFzdIn/5tLBZyKy4F54UFo35eOX8/g7OaE+xrgY/4bZjpxC1 1pd66AAtKb3aNXpHvIfkVV6NYloo52H+FUE5ZDPNCGD0/btFGPWmWRmkPybzColTy7fmPaGz cBcEEqHK4T0aY4UJmE7Ylvg255Kz7s6wGZe6IR3N0cKNv++O7QARAQABtCVGZXJydWggWWln aXQgPGZlcnJ1aC55aWdpdEBpbnRlbC5jb20+iQJVBBMBAgA/AhsDBgsJCAcDAgYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgBYhBNI2U4dCLsKE45mBx/kz60PfE2EfBQJbughWBQkHwjOGAAoJEPkz60Pf E2Eft84QAIbKWqhgqRfoiw/BbXbA1+qm2o4UgkCRQ0yJgt9QsnbpOmPKydHH0ixCliNz1J8e mRXCkMini1bTpnzp7spOjQGLeAFkNFz6BMq8YF2mVWbGEDE9WgnAxZdi0eLY7ZQnHbE6AxKL SXmpe9INb6z3ztseFt7mqje/W/6DWYIMnH3Yz9KzxujFWDcq8UCAvPkxVQXLTMpauhFgYeEx Nub5HbvhxTfUkapLwRQsSd/HbywzqZ3s/bbYMjj5JO3tgMiM9g9HOjv1G2f1dQjHi5YQiTZl 1eIIqQ3pTic6ROaiZqNmQFXPsoOOFfXF8nN2zg8kl/sSdoXWHhama5hbwwtl1vdaygQYlmdK H2ueiFh/UvT3WG3waNv2eZiEbHV8Rk52Xyn2w1G90lV0fYC6Ket1Xjoch7kjwbx793Kz/RfQ rmBY8/S4DTGn3oq3dMdQY+b6+7VMUeLMMh2CXYO9ErkOq+qNTD1IY+cBAkXnaDbQfz0zbste ZGWH74FAZ9nCpDOqbRTrBL42aMGhfOWEyeA1x7+hl6JZfabBWAuf4nnCXuorKHzBXTrf7u7p fXsKQClWRW77PF1VmzrtKNVSytQAmlCWApQIw20AarFipXmVdIjHmJPU611WoyxZPb4JTOxx 5cv9B+nr/RIB+v5dcStyHCCwO1be7nBDdCgd4F6kTQPLuQINBFfWTL4BEACnNA29e8TarUsB L5n6eLZHXcFvVwNLVlirWOClHXf44o2KnN3ww+eBEmKVfEFo9MSuGDNHS8Zw1NiGMYxLIUgd U6gGrVVs/VrQWL82pbMk6jCj98N+BXIri+6K1z+AImz7ax7iF1kDgRAnFWU0znWWBgM2mM8Y gDjcxfXk4sCKnvf6Gjo08Ey5zmqx7dekAKU2EEp8Q1EJY3jbymLdZWRP4AFFMTS1rGMk0/tt v71NBg1GobCcbNfn9chK/jhqxYhAJqq86RdJQkt3/9x1U1Oq0vXCt4JVVHmkxePtUiuWTTt+ aYlUAsKYZsWvncExvw77x2ArYDmaK0yfjh37wp0lY7DOJHFxoyT8tyWZlLci/VMRG2Ja33xj 0CN4C1yBg+QDeV3QFxQo42iA/ykdXPUR3ezmsND3XKvVLTC4DNb3V/EZQ7jBj64+bEK0VW4G B31VP00ApNQvSoczsIOAKdk97RNbpmPw6q10ILIB+9T1xbnFYzshzGF17oC0/GENIHATx8vZ masOZoDiOZQpeneLgnFE9JfzhLTxv6wNZcc/HLXRQVTkDsQr8ERtkAoHCf1E5+b5Yr7pfnE4 YuhET746o25S53ELUYPIs49qoJsEJL34/oexMfPGyPIlrbufiNyty5jc/1MRwUlhJlJ5IOHy ZUa+6CLR7GdImusFkPJUJwARAQABiQI8BBgBAgAmAhsMFiEE0jZTh0IuwoTjmYHH+TPrQ98T YR8FAlu6CHAFCQXE7zIACgkQ+TPrQ98TYR9nXxAAqNBgkYNyGuWUuy0GwDQCbu3iiMyH1+D7 llafPcK4NYy1Z4AYuVwC9nmLaoj+ozdqS3ncRo57ncRsKEJC46nDJJZYZ5LSJVn63Y3NBF86 lxQAgjj2oyZEwaLKtKbAFsXL43jv1pUGgSvWwYtDwHITXXFQto9rZEuUDRFSx4sg9OR+Q6/6 LY+nQQ3OdHlBkflzYMPcWgDcvcTAO6yasLEUf7UcYoSWTyMYjLB4QuNlXzTswzGVMssJF/vo V8lD1eqqaSUWG3STF6GVLQOr1NLvN5+kUBiEStHFxBpgSCvYY9sNV8FS6N24CAWMBl+10W+D 2h1yiiP5dOdPcBDYKsgqDD91/sP0WdyMJkwdQJtD49f9f+lYloxHnSAxMleOpyscg1pldw+i mPaUY1bmIknLhhkqfMmjywQOXpac5LRMibAAYkcB8v7y3kwELnt8mhqqZy6LUsqcWygNbH/W K3GGt5tRpeIXeJ25x8gg5EBQ0Jnvp/IbBYQfPLtXH0Myq2QuAhk/1q2yEIbVjS+7iowEZNyE 56K63WBJxsJPB2mvmLgn98GqB4G6GufP1ndS0XDti/2K0o8rep9xoY/JDGi0n0L0tk9BHyoP Y7kaEpu7UyY3nVdRLe5H1/MnFG8hdJ97WqnPS0buYZlrbTV0nRFL/NI2VABl18vEEXvNQiO+ vM8= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:41:54 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E706115334F196@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v3] ethdev: claim device reset as async X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:41:58 -0000 On 3/19/2019 1:40 PM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Yigit, Ferruh >> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 9:14 PM >> To: Zhang, Qi Z ; thomas@monjalon.net; Doherty, Declan >> >> Cc: ktraynor@redhat.com; dev@dpdk.org; Shelton, Benjamin H >> ; Vangati, Narender >> >> Subject: Re: [RFC v3] ethdev: claim device reset as async >> >> On 10/4/2018 4:58 PM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote: >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Yigit, Ferruh >>>> Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 7:30 PM >>>> To: Zhang, Qi Z ; thomas@monjalon.net; Doherty, >>>> Declan >>>> Cc: ktraynor@redhat.com; dev@dpdk.org; Shelton, Benjamin H >>>> ; Vangati, Narender >>>> >>>> Subject: Re: [RFC v3] ethdev: claim device reset as async >>>> >>>> On 9/20/2018 5:56 AM, Qi Zhang wrote: >>>>> Device reset should be implemented in an async way since it is >>>>> possible to be invoked in interrupt thread and sometimes to reset a >>>>> device need to wait for some dependency, for example, a VF expects >>>>> for PF ready or a NIC function as part of a SOC wait for the whole >>>>> system reset complete, and all these time-consuming tasks will block >>>>> the interrupt thread. >>>>> The patch rename rte_eth_dev_reset to rte_eth_dev_reset_async and >>>>> rework the implementation. It will spawn a new thread which will >>>>> call >>>>> ops->dev_reset, and when finished it will raise the event >>>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET_COMPLETE. The application should always wait for >>>>> this event before it continues to configure and restart the device. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang >>>> >>>> <...> >>>> >>>>> @@ -1385,10 +1413,26 @@ rte_eth_dev_reset(uint16_t port_id) >>>>> >>>>> RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->dev_reset, >> -ENOTSUP); >>>>> >>>>> + /* already on resetting */ >>>>> + if (dev->state == RTE_ETH_DEV_RESETTING) >>>>> + return 0; >>>>> + >>>>> + args = calloc(1, sizeof(struct dev_reset_args)); >>>>> + if (!args) >>>>> + return -ENOMEM; >>>>> + >>>>> rte_eth_dev_stop(port_id); >>>>> - ret = dev->dev_ops->dev_reset(dev); >>>>> >>>>> - return eth_err(port_id, ret); >>>>> + /* store previous device state temporary */ >>>>> + args->pre_state = dev->state; >>>>> + >>>>> + dev->state = RTE_ETH_DEV_RESETTING; >>>> >>>> Do we need to update the state, I think this will break >>>> rte_eth_dev_count() and friends, like during device reset app will think it has >> one less device in system. >>> >>> I'd like to have this new state which represent the situation of the device more >> accurate. >>> In this patch RTE_ETH_DEV_RESETTING is just to be used to prevent double >> reset, but in future it can also be used to prevent invalid operation during device >> reset. >>> >>> Of cause we need to make sure it does not break exist behavior and seems add >> RTE_ETH_DEV_RESETTING check in rte_eth_find_next_owned_by and >> rte_eth_find_next is able to fix the issue you observed. >>> >>> I can add this in v4 if you agree the idea. >>> >>>> >>>> <...> >>>> >>>>> @@ -1814,21 +1816,29 @@ void rte_eth_dev_close(uint16_t port_id); >>>>> * RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET event is detected, but can also use it >>>>> to >>>> start >>>>> * a port reset in other circumstances. >>>>> * >>>>> - * When this function is called, it first stops the port and then >>>>> calls the >>>>> - * PMD specific dev_uninit( ) and dev_init( ) to return the port to >>>>> initial >>>>> - * state, in which no Tx and Rx queues are setup, as if the port >>>>> has been >>>>> - * reset and not started. The port keeps the port id it had before >>>>> the >>>>> - * function call. >>>>> - * >>>>> - * After calling rte_eth_dev_reset( ), the application should use >>>>> - * rte_eth_dev_configure( ), rte_eth_rx_queue_setup( ), >>>>> - * rte_eth_tx_queue_setup( ), and rte_eth_dev_start( ) >>>>> - * to reconfigure the device as appropriate. >>>>> - * >>>>> - * Note: To avoid unexpected behavior, the application should stop >>>>> calling >>>>> - * Tx and Rx functions before calling rte_eth_dev_reset( ). For >>>>> thread >>>>> - * safety, all these controlling functions should be called from >>>>> the same >>>>> - * thread. >>>>> + * @note >>>>> + * Device reset may have the dependency, for example, a VF reset >>>>> + expects >>>>> + * PF ready, or a NIC function as a part of a SOC need to wait for >>>>> + other >>>>> + * parts of the system be ready, these are time-consuming tasks and >>>>> + will >>>>> + * block current thread. >>>>> + * >>>>> + * As the name, rte_eth_dev_reset_async is an async API, it will >>>>> + spwan a >>>>> + * new thread to call ops->dev_reset, once it is finished, it will >>>>> + raise >>>>> + * the RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET_COMPLETE event to notify application. >>>>> + That makes >>>>> + * things easy for an application that what to reset the device >>>>> + from the >>>>> + * interrupt thread since typically a RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET >>>>> + handler is >>>>> + * invoked in interrupt thread. >>>> >>>> thread calls dev_ops->dev_reset(dev) and wait for it, so it means >>>> dev_ops->dev_reset is synchronous, perhaps it would be good to >>>> highlight this in "dev_reset" comment to help PMD developers. >>> >>> OK >>> >>>> >>>> of dev_ops->dev_reset() is synchronous, means existing >>>> rte_eth_dev_reset() is synchronous, so what do you thinks keep >>>> rte_eth_dev_reset() as it is and add new >>>> rte_eth_dev_reset_async() API? Than we will have both sync and async >>>> solution. >>> >>> Typically device reset happens when application receive >> RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET and this is in interrupt thread. >>> Invoke an async API in interrupt thread is the right way, is it better if we >> highlight this is the only way? >>> I may not prefer to expose the sync API right now, it's better to figure out some >> typical usage before we expose this, but so far I don't have. >> >> Hi Qi, >> >> Is the 'rte_eth_dev_reset_async()' still required? Is there any update planned to >> this RFC? > > Yes, I think the requirement is still there. Just don't have bandwidth work on this recently. > May I send out v1 for 19.05 in this week? since deprecation notes already be send out in 19.02 cycle I think technically yes, since proposal is already out for a long time. But it will give less time to review it when you send this week. > > >> >>> >>> Regards >>> Qi >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> + * >>>>> + * Application should not assume device reset is finished after >>>>> + * rte_eth_dev_reset_async return, it should always wait for a >>>>> + * RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET_COMPLETE event and check the reset result. >>>>> + * If reset success, application should call rte_eth_dev_configure( >>>>> + ), >>>>> + * rte_eth_rx_queue_setup( ), rte_eth_tx_queue_setup( ), >>>>> + * and rte_eth_dev_start( ) to reconfigure the device as appropriate. >>>>> + * >>>>> + * @Note >>>>> + * To avoid unexpected behavior, the application should stop >>>>> + calling >>>>> + * Tx and Rx functions before calling rte_eth_dev_reset_async( ). >>>>> * >>>>> * @param port_id >>>>> * The port identifier of the Ethernet device. >>>>> @@ -1837,12 +1847,10 @@ void rte_eth_dev_close(uint16_t port_id); >>>>> * - (0) if successful. >>>>> * - (-EINVAL) if port identifier is invalid. >>>>> * - (-ENOTSUP) if hardware doesn't support this function. >>>>> - * - (-EPERM) if not ran from the primary process. >>>>> - * - (-EIO) if re-initialisation failed or device is removed. >>>>> * - (-ENOMEM) if the reset failed due to OOM. >>>>> - * - (-EAGAIN) if the reset temporarily failed and should be retried later. >>>>> + * - (<0) other errors from low level driver. >>>>> */ >>>>> -int rte_eth_dev_reset(uint16_t port_id); >>>>> +int rte_eth_dev_reset_async(uint16_t port_id); >>>>> >>>>> /** >>>>> * Enable receipt in promiscuous mode for an Ethernet device. >>>>> @@ -2574,6 +2582,8 @@ enum rte_eth_event_type { >>>>> /**< queue state event (enabled/disabled) */ >>>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET, >>>>> /**< reset interrupt event, sent to VF on PF reset */ >>>>> + RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET_COMPLETE, >>>>> + /**< inform application that reset is completed */ >>>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_VF_MBOX, /**< message from the VF received by >> PF >>>> */ >>>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_MACSEC, /**< MACsec offload related event */ >>>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RMV, /**< device removal event */ >>>>> >>> > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C490A00E6 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:42:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166D925A1; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:42:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327F51DBD for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:41:58 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Mar 2019 09:41:57 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,498,1544515200"; d="scan'208";a="308537076" Received: from fyigit-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.46]) ([10.237.221.46]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2019 09:41:54 -0700 To: "Zhang, Qi Z" , "thomas@monjalon.net" , "Doherty, Declan" Cc: "ktraynor@redhat.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Shelton, Benjamin H" , "Vangati, Narender" References: <20180920045626.106109-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E70611532AA4B1@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <4c60c418-e653-41ec-ef09-b348dbd7d140@intel.com> <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E706115334F196@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=ferruh.yigit@intel.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFXZCFABEADCujshBOAaqPZpwShdkzkyGpJ15lmxiSr3jVMqOtQS/sB3FYLT0/d3+bvy qbL9YnlbPyRvZfnP3pXiKwkRoR1RJwEo2BOf6hxdzTmLRtGtwWzI9MwrUPj6n/ldiD58VAGQ +iR1I/z9UBUN/ZMksElA2D7Jgg7vZ78iKwNnd+vLBD6I61kVrZ45Vjo3r+pPOByUBXOUlxp9 GWEKKIrJ4eogqkVNSixN16VYK7xR+5OUkBYUO+sE6etSxCr7BahMPKxH+XPlZZjKrxciaWQb +dElz3Ab4Opl+ZT/bK2huX+W+NJBEBVzjTkhjSTjcyRdxvS1gwWRuXqAml/sh+KQjPV1PPHF YK5LcqLkle+OKTCa82OvUb7cr+ALxATIZXQkgmn+zFT8UzSS3aiBBohg3BtbTIWy51jNlYdy ezUZ4UxKSsFuUTPt+JjHQBvF7WKbmNGS3fCid5Iag4tWOfZoqiCNzxApkVugltxoc6rG2TyX CmI2rP0mQ0GOsGXA3+3c1MCdQFzdIn/5tLBZyKy4F54UFo35eOX8/g7OaE+xrgY/4bZjpxC1 1pd66AAtKb3aNXpHvIfkVV6NYloo52H+FUE5ZDPNCGD0/btFGPWmWRmkPybzColTy7fmPaGz cBcEEqHK4T0aY4UJmE7Ylvg255Kz7s6wGZe6IR3N0cKNv++O7QARAQABtCVGZXJydWggWWln aXQgPGZlcnJ1aC55aWdpdEBpbnRlbC5jb20+iQJVBBMBAgA/AhsDBgsJCAcDAgYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgBYhBNI2U4dCLsKE45mBx/kz60PfE2EfBQJbughWBQkHwjOGAAoJEPkz60Pf E2Eft84QAIbKWqhgqRfoiw/BbXbA1+qm2o4UgkCRQ0yJgt9QsnbpOmPKydHH0ixCliNz1J8e mRXCkMini1bTpnzp7spOjQGLeAFkNFz6BMq8YF2mVWbGEDE9WgnAxZdi0eLY7ZQnHbE6AxKL SXmpe9INb6z3ztseFt7mqje/W/6DWYIMnH3Yz9KzxujFWDcq8UCAvPkxVQXLTMpauhFgYeEx Nub5HbvhxTfUkapLwRQsSd/HbywzqZ3s/bbYMjj5JO3tgMiM9g9HOjv1G2f1dQjHi5YQiTZl 1eIIqQ3pTic6ROaiZqNmQFXPsoOOFfXF8nN2zg8kl/sSdoXWHhama5hbwwtl1vdaygQYlmdK H2ueiFh/UvT3WG3waNv2eZiEbHV8Rk52Xyn2w1G90lV0fYC6Ket1Xjoch7kjwbx793Kz/RfQ rmBY8/S4DTGn3oq3dMdQY+b6+7VMUeLMMh2CXYO9ErkOq+qNTD1IY+cBAkXnaDbQfz0zbste ZGWH74FAZ9nCpDOqbRTrBL42aMGhfOWEyeA1x7+hl6JZfabBWAuf4nnCXuorKHzBXTrf7u7p fXsKQClWRW77PF1VmzrtKNVSytQAmlCWApQIw20AarFipXmVdIjHmJPU611WoyxZPb4JTOxx 5cv9B+nr/RIB+v5dcStyHCCwO1be7nBDdCgd4F6kTQPLuQINBFfWTL4BEACnNA29e8TarUsB L5n6eLZHXcFvVwNLVlirWOClHXf44o2KnN3ww+eBEmKVfEFo9MSuGDNHS8Zw1NiGMYxLIUgd U6gGrVVs/VrQWL82pbMk6jCj98N+BXIri+6K1z+AImz7ax7iF1kDgRAnFWU0znWWBgM2mM8Y gDjcxfXk4sCKnvf6Gjo08Ey5zmqx7dekAKU2EEp8Q1EJY3jbymLdZWRP4AFFMTS1rGMk0/tt v71NBg1GobCcbNfn9chK/jhqxYhAJqq86RdJQkt3/9x1U1Oq0vXCt4JVVHmkxePtUiuWTTt+ aYlUAsKYZsWvncExvw77x2ArYDmaK0yfjh37wp0lY7DOJHFxoyT8tyWZlLci/VMRG2Ja33xj 0CN4C1yBg+QDeV3QFxQo42iA/ykdXPUR3ezmsND3XKvVLTC4DNb3V/EZQ7jBj64+bEK0VW4G B31VP00ApNQvSoczsIOAKdk97RNbpmPw6q10ILIB+9T1xbnFYzshzGF17oC0/GENIHATx8vZ masOZoDiOZQpeneLgnFE9JfzhLTxv6wNZcc/HLXRQVTkDsQr8ERtkAoHCf1E5+b5Yr7pfnE4 YuhET746o25S53ELUYPIs49qoJsEJL34/oexMfPGyPIlrbufiNyty5jc/1MRwUlhJlJ5IOHy ZUa+6CLR7GdImusFkPJUJwARAQABiQI8BBgBAgAmAhsMFiEE0jZTh0IuwoTjmYHH+TPrQ98T YR8FAlu6CHAFCQXE7zIACgkQ+TPrQ98TYR9nXxAAqNBgkYNyGuWUuy0GwDQCbu3iiMyH1+D7 llafPcK4NYy1Z4AYuVwC9nmLaoj+ozdqS3ncRo57ncRsKEJC46nDJJZYZ5LSJVn63Y3NBF86 lxQAgjj2oyZEwaLKtKbAFsXL43jv1pUGgSvWwYtDwHITXXFQto9rZEuUDRFSx4sg9OR+Q6/6 LY+nQQ3OdHlBkflzYMPcWgDcvcTAO6yasLEUf7UcYoSWTyMYjLB4QuNlXzTswzGVMssJF/vo V8lD1eqqaSUWG3STF6GVLQOr1NLvN5+kUBiEStHFxBpgSCvYY9sNV8FS6N24CAWMBl+10W+D 2h1yiiP5dOdPcBDYKsgqDD91/sP0WdyMJkwdQJtD49f9f+lYloxHnSAxMleOpyscg1pldw+i mPaUY1bmIknLhhkqfMmjywQOXpac5LRMibAAYkcB8v7y3kwELnt8mhqqZy6LUsqcWygNbH/W K3GGt5tRpeIXeJ25x8gg5EBQ0Jnvp/IbBYQfPLtXH0Myq2QuAhk/1q2yEIbVjS+7iowEZNyE 56K63WBJxsJPB2mvmLgn98GqB4G6GufP1ndS0XDti/2K0o8rep9xoY/JDGi0n0L0tk9BHyoP Y7kaEpu7UyY3nVdRLe5H1/MnFG8hdJ97WqnPS0buYZlrbTV0nRFL/NI2VABl18vEEXvNQiO+ vM8= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:41:54 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E706115334F196@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v3] ethdev: claim device reset as async X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190319164154.0BnUF3nEjkG-ZqLyY182tEvrbTVv1BDgP8POB4xmCrc@z> On 3/19/2019 1:40 PM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Yigit, Ferruh >> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 9:14 PM >> To: Zhang, Qi Z ; thomas@monjalon.net; Doherty, Declan >> >> Cc: ktraynor@redhat.com; dev@dpdk.org; Shelton, Benjamin H >> ; Vangati, Narender >> >> Subject: Re: [RFC v3] ethdev: claim device reset as async >> >> On 10/4/2018 4:58 PM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote: >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Yigit, Ferruh >>>> Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 7:30 PM >>>> To: Zhang, Qi Z ; thomas@monjalon.net; Doherty, >>>> Declan >>>> Cc: ktraynor@redhat.com; dev@dpdk.org; Shelton, Benjamin H >>>> ; Vangati, Narender >>>> >>>> Subject: Re: [RFC v3] ethdev: claim device reset as async >>>> >>>> On 9/20/2018 5:56 AM, Qi Zhang wrote: >>>>> Device reset should be implemented in an async way since it is >>>>> possible to be invoked in interrupt thread and sometimes to reset a >>>>> device need to wait for some dependency, for example, a VF expects >>>>> for PF ready or a NIC function as part of a SOC wait for the whole >>>>> system reset complete, and all these time-consuming tasks will block >>>>> the interrupt thread. >>>>> The patch rename rte_eth_dev_reset to rte_eth_dev_reset_async and >>>>> rework the implementation. It will spawn a new thread which will >>>>> call >>>>> ops->dev_reset, and when finished it will raise the event >>>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET_COMPLETE. The application should always wait for >>>>> this event before it continues to configure and restart the device. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang >>>> >>>> <...> >>>> >>>>> @@ -1385,10 +1413,26 @@ rte_eth_dev_reset(uint16_t port_id) >>>>> >>>>> RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->dev_reset, >> -ENOTSUP); >>>>> >>>>> + /* already on resetting */ >>>>> + if (dev->state == RTE_ETH_DEV_RESETTING) >>>>> + return 0; >>>>> + >>>>> + args = calloc(1, sizeof(struct dev_reset_args)); >>>>> + if (!args) >>>>> + return -ENOMEM; >>>>> + >>>>> rte_eth_dev_stop(port_id); >>>>> - ret = dev->dev_ops->dev_reset(dev); >>>>> >>>>> - return eth_err(port_id, ret); >>>>> + /* store previous device state temporary */ >>>>> + args->pre_state = dev->state; >>>>> + >>>>> + dev->state = RTE_ETH_DEV_RESETTING; >>>> >>>> Do we need to update the state, I think this will break >>>> rte_eth_dev_count() and friends, like during device reset app will think it has >> one less device in system. >>> >>> I'd like to have this new state which represent the situation of the device more >> accurate. >>> In this patch RTE_ETH_DEV_RESETTING is just to be used to prevent double >> reset, but in future it can also be used to prevent invalid operation during device >> reset. >>> >>> Of cause we need to make sure it does not break exist behavior and seems add >> RTE_ETH_DEV_RESETTING check in rte_eth_find_next_owned_by and >> rte_eth_find_next is able to fix the issue you observed. >>> >>> I can add this in v4 if you agree the idea. >>> >>>> >>>> <...> >>>> >>>>> @@ -1814,21 +1816,29 @@ void rte_eth_dev_close(uint16_t port_id); >>>>> * RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET event is detected, but can also use it >>>>> to >>>> start >>>>> * a port reset in other circumstances. >>>>> * >>>>> - * When this function is called, it first stops the port and then >>>>> calls the >>>>> - * PMD specific dev_uninit( ) and dev_init( ) to return the port to >>>>> initial >>>>> - * state, in which no Tx and Rx queues are setup, as if the port >>>>> has been >>>>> - * reset and not started. The port keeps the port id it had before >>>>> the >>>>> - * function call. >>>>> - * >>>>> - * After calling rte_eth_dev_reset( ), the application should use >>>>> - * rte_eth_dev_configure( ), rte_eth_rx_queue_setup( ), >>>>> - * rte_eth_tx_queue_setup( ), and rte_eth_dev_start( ) >>>>> - * to reconfigure the device as appropriate. >>>>> - * >>>>> - * Note: To avoid unexpected behavior, the application should stop >>>>> calling >>>>> - * Tx and Rx functions before calling rte_eth_dev_reset( ). For >>>>> thread >>>>> - * safety, all these controlling functions should be called from >>>>> the same >>>>> - * thread. >>>>> + * @note >>>>> + * Device reset may have the dependency, for example, a VF reset >>>>> + expects >>>>> + * PF ready, or a NIC function as a part of a SOC need to wait for >>>>> + other >>>>> + * parts of the system be ready, these are time-consuming tasks and >>>>> + will >>>>> + * block current thread. >>>>> + * >>>>> + * As the name, rte_eth_dev_reset_async is an async API, it will >>>>> + spwan a >>>>> + * new thread to call ops->dev_reset, once it is finished, it will >>>>> + raise >>>>> + * the RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET_COMPLETE event to notify application. >>>>> + That makes >>>>> + * things easy for an application that what to reset the device >>>>> + from the >>>>> + * interrupt thread since typically a RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET >>>>> + handler is >>>>> + * invoked in interrupt thread. >>>> >>>> thread calls dev_ops->dev_reset(dev) and wait for it, so it means >>>> dev_ops->dev_reset is synchronous, perhaps it would be good to >>>> highlight this in "dev_reset" comment to help PMD developers. >>> >>> OK >>> >>>> >>>> of dev_ops->dev_reset() is synchronous, means existing >>>> rte_eth_dev_reset() is synchronous, so what do you thinks keep >>>> rte_eth_dev_reset() as it is and add new >>>> rte_eth_dev_reset_async() API? Than we will have both sync and async >>>> solution. >>> >>> Typically device reset happens when application receive >> RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET and this is in interrupt thread. >>> Invoke an async API in interrupt thread is the right way, is it better if we >> highlight this is the only way? >>> I may not prefer to expose the sync API right now, it's better to figure out some >> typical usage before we expose this, but so far I don't have. >> >> Hi Qi, >> >> Is the 'rte_eth_dev_reset_async()' still required? Is there any update planned to >> this RFC? > > Yes, I think the requirement is still there. Just don't have bandwidth work on this recently. > May I send out v1 for 19.05 in this week? since deprecation notes already be send out in 19.02 cycle I think technically yes, since proposal is already out for a long time. But it will give less time to review it when you send this week. > > >> >>> >>> Regards >>> Qi >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> + * >>>>> + * Application should not assume device reset is finished after >>>>> + * rte_eth_dev_reset_async return, it should always wait for a >>>>> + * RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET_COMPLETE event and check the reset result. >>>>> + * If reset success, application should call rte_eth_dev_configure( >>>>> + ), >>>>> + * rte_eth_rx_queue_setup( ), rte_eth_tx_queue_setup( ), >>>>> + * and rte_eth_dev_start( ) to reconfigure the device as appropriate. >>>>> + * >>>>> + * @Note >>>>> + * To avoid unexpected behavior, the application should stop >>>>> + calling >>>>> + * Tx and Rx functions before calling rte_eth_dev_reset_async( ). >>>>> * >>>>> * @param port_id >>>>> * The port identifier of the Ethernet device. >>>>> @@ -1837,12 +1847,10 @@ void rte_eth_dev_close(uint16_t port_id); >>>>> * - (0) if successful. >>>>> * - (-EINVAL) if port identifier is invalid. >>>>> * - (-ENOTSUP) if hardware doesn't support this function. >>>>> - * - (-EPERM) if not ran from the primary process. >>>>> - * - (-EIO) if re-initialisation failed or device is removed. >>>>> * - (-ENOMEM) if the reset failed due to OOM. >>>>> - * - (-EAGAIN) if the reset temporarily failed and should be retried later. >>>>> + * - (<0) other errors from low level driver. >>>>> */ >>>>> -int rte_eth_dev_reset(uint16_t port_id); >>>>> +int rte_eth_dev_reset_async(uint16_t port_id); >>>>> >>>>> /** >>>>> * Enable receipt in promiscuous mode for an Ethernet device. >>>>> @@ -2574,6 +2582,8 @@ enum rte_eth_event_type { >>>>> /**< queue state event (enabled/disabled) */ >>>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET, >>>>> /**< reset interrupt event, sent to VF on PF reset */ >>>>> + RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET_COMPLETE, >>>>> + /**< inform application that reset is completed */ >>>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_VF_MBOX, /**< message from the VF received by >> PF >>>> */ >>>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_MACSEC, /**< MACsec offload related event */ >>>>> RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RMV, /**< device removal event */ >>>>> >>> >