From: "Kinsella, Ray" <mdr@ashroe.eu>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] devtools: update abi ignore for cryptodev
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:11:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af7cf811-e28b-77af-d8f3-96a9b5b11655@ashroe.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2579086.B9NNOlTe4A@thomas>
On 21/01/2021 15:58, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 21/01/2021 16:15, Dodji Seketeli:
>> Hello Thomas and others,
>>
>> Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> writes:
>>
>>> Question to an expert, Dodji,
>>
>> Thanks for the kind words, but I am not an expert in anything, sadly. I
>> am just trying to keep learning about these things ;-)
>>
>>> We have this structure:
>>>
>>> struct rte_cryptodev {
>>> lot of fields...
>>> uint8_t attached : 1;
>>> } __rte_cache_aligned;
>>>
>>> Because of the cache alignment, there is enough padding in the struct
>>> (no matter the size of the cache line) for adding two more pointers:
>>>
>>> struct rte_cryptodev {
>>> lot of fields...
>>> uint8_t attached : 1;
>>> struct rte_cryptodev_cb_rcu *enq_cbs;
>>> struct rte_cryptodev_cb_rcu *deq_cbs;
>>> } __rte_cache_aligned;
>>>
>>> We checked manually that the ABI is still compatible.
>>
>> Right.
>>
>> I am curious, but normally, libabigail should raise the addition of
>> structures, but then it'll tell you that there was no size or offset
>> change between the two structures. If it doesn't, then that's a bug. I
>> hope it does :-)
>
> Yes it was raising a problem, that's why we are adding a rule.
>
>
>>> Then I've added (quickly) a libabigail exception rule:
>>>
>>> [suppress_type]
>>> name = rte_cryptodev
>>> has_data_member_inserted_between = {0, 1023}
>>>
>>> Now we want to improve this rule to restrict the offsets
>>> to the padding at the end of the struct only,
>>> so we keep forbidding changes in existing fields,
>>> and forbidding additions further the current struct size.
>>> Is this new rule good?
>>>
>>> has_data_member_inserted_between = {offset_after(attached), end}
>>
>>
>> Yes, this rule should do what you think it says.
>>
>>> Do you confirm that the keyword "end" means the old reference size?
>>
>> Yes I do.
>>
>>
>>> What else do we need to check for adding a new field in a padding?
>>
>> Actually, that rule will work independantly of it there is enough
>> padding or not. It'll shut down the change report, even if the added
>> data exceeds the padding.
>
> I don't understand why.
> If "end" means the old reference size, then addition after the old size
> should be reported, isn't it?
yes - this comment confuses me also.
If "end" refers to the size original data-structure (position of the end),
which in this case had some padding. If the additions fall fully within the
padding I would expect this rule to work - as long as the data-structure size
is still the same.
However if the additions fall beyond the size of the original data-structure,
the data-structure's size will have changed, I would not expect this rule to
condone a change in the size of the data-structure.
>
>
>> You just made me think of an idea of a new feature there.
>>
>> Maybe we'd need a new property for the [suppress_type] directive that
>> would suppress changes only if said changes don't modify the size of the
>> type or any offset of any member of the type?
>>
>> Maybe something like:
>>
>> [suppress_type]
>> ; lots of properties can go here.
>>
>> ; ...
>>
>> ; If the type has any size or offset change
>> ; then this suppression directive will fail
>> ; and the change report will be emitted
>> has_no_size_or_offset_change
>>
>> Would that be useful to you in this case,
>>
>> Cheers,
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-22 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-20 14:25 Ray Kinsella
2021-01-20 15:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-01-21 15:15 ` Dodji Seketeli
2021-01-21 15:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-01-22 12:11 ` Kinsella, Ray [this message]
2021-01-22 13:09 ` Dodji Seketeli
2021-01-22 13:12 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-01-24 11:58 ` Dodji Seketeli
2021-01-26 11:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af7cf811-e28b-77af-d8f3-96a9b5b11655@ashroe.eu \
--to=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dodji@redhat.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).