From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: John Sucaet <john.sucaet@oneaccess-net.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Query : Does Binding with vfio-pci is supported inside qemu-kvm guest/vm instance.?
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 14:38:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0f9eb7f-f90d-9794-c733-3d479db069e3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38a5d7ab-7449-fabb-46f7-6acf9d99680f@oneaccess-net.com>
On 02-Apr-19 11:38 AM, John Sucaet wrote:
> Hi Anatoly,
>
> As you said: There's no reason to use igb_uio, ever!
That was partly tongue in cheek, but point taken :)
> I would like to ask whether vfio-pci with or without vIOMMU should/could
> work for virtio-pci net devices in the case of a 32-bit dpdk
> application, on a 64-bit kernel (4.9) inside a guest VM
> (qemu-2.10.2-1.fc27)?
>
> I tried both a 64-bit and a 32-bit version of the same application, but
> only in the case of the 64-bit application, the port was found by eal.
> The 32-bit application gave errors like:
>
> EAL: pci_map_resource(): cannot mmap(16, 0xf4a01000, 0x4000, 0x0):
> Invalid argument (0xffffffff)
> EAL: Failed to map pci BAR4
> EAL: 0000:00:02.0 mapping BAR4 failed: Invalid argument
> EAL: Can't write to PCI bar (0) : offset (12)
> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (12)
> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (12)
> EAL: Can't write to PCI bar (0) : offset (12)
> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (12)
> EAL: Can't write to PCI bar (0) : offset (12)
> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (0)
> EAL: Can't write to PCI bar (0) : offset (4)
> EAL: Can't write to PCI bar (0) : offset (14)
> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (14)
> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (1a)
> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (1c)
> EAL: Can't write to PCI bar (0) : offset (e)
> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (c)
> virtio_init_queue(): virtqueue size is not powerof 2
> EAL: Requested device 0000:00:02.0 cannot be used
>
> Maybe you have an idea what went wrong here?
>
> By preference, I would like to continue to use the 32-bit application
> which worked fine with the igb_uio driver.
Unfortunately, i am not very familiar with virtio and wouldn't know
whether it's supposed to work under these conditions. Perhaps Maxime
would be of more help here (CC'd).
>
>
> Thanks
>
> John
>
>
> On 03/12/2019 11:57 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
>> On 12-Mar-19 10:20 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 05:54:39PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2019/3/12 下午5:42, Thanneeru Srinivasulu wrote:
>>>>> Thanks Bruce..
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 3:08 PM Bruce Richardson
>>>>> <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:57:55AM +0530, Thanneeru Srinivasulu
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Everyone.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did attached pice to Guest VM using vfio-pci with qemu
>>>>>>> command, and then
>>>>>>> tried binding the pcie bdf with vfio-pci, observing binding
>>>>>>> failure with
>>>>>>> vfio-pci.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where as when tryied with igb_uio, everything works fine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does Binding with vfio-pci is supported inside VM/guest?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> vfio support requires the presence of an IOMMU, and you generally
>>>>>> don't
>>>>>> have an IOMMU available in a VM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Bruce
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually, Qemu support vIOMMU + VFIO in guest[1], all you need is to
>>>> add a
>>>> intel IOMMU and enabling caching mode.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>>
>>>> https://www.lfasiallc.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Device-Assignment-with-Nested-Guests-and-DPDK_Peter-Xu.pdf
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Thanks for the info.
>>>
>>> /Bruce
>>>
>>
>> One more thing: even without vIOMMU, VFIO has no-IOMMU mode which can
>> be enabled (for a recent-enough kernel). This will make VFIO work even
>> in cases where the guest doesn't have IOMMU emulation. See? There's no
>> reason to use igb_uio, ever! :D
>>
>
>
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-12 5:27 Thanneeru Srinivasulu
2019-03-12 9:38 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-03-12 9:42 ` Thanneeru Srinivasulu
2019-03-12 9:54 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-12 10:20 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-03-12 10:57 ` Burakov, Anatoly
[not found] ` <CGME20190312110957eucas1p1af74c8d26bf80fd815847ed8086a1e78@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-03-12 11:09 ` Ilya Maximets
2019-04-02 10:38 ` John Sucaet
2019-04-02 10:38 ` John Sucaet
2019-04-02 13:38 ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2019-04-02 13:38 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-03 7:49 ` John Sucaet
2019-04-03 7:49 ` John Sucaet
2019-04-03 7:54 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-04-03 7:54 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-04-04 8:23 ` John Sucaet
2019-04-04 8:23 ` John Sucaet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b0f9eb7f-f90d-9794-c733-3d479db069e3@intel.com \
--to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=john.sucaet@oneaccess-net.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).