From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE2AA045E for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:35:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806A71BA0C; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:31:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57011B9EA for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:31:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 May 2019 09:31:51 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from silpixa00399498.ir.intel.com (HELO silpixa00399498.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.237.223.125]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 May 2019 09:31:49 -0700 From: Anatoly Burakov To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Gage Eads , Olivier Matz , stephen@networkplumber.org, thomas@monjalon.net, david.marchand@redhat.com Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 17:31:06 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 20/25] stack: use new tailq locking API X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Replace usages of direct access to shared memory config with calls to the new API. Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov --- lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c index 60f63a65b..a2671a7b8 100644 --- a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c +++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c @@ -84,13 +84,13 @@ rte_stack_create(const char *name, unsigned int count, int socket_id, return NULL; } - rte_rwlock_write_lock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_eal_mcfg_tailq_write_lock(); mz = rte_memzone_reserve_aligned(mz_name, sz, socket_id, 0, __alignof__(*s)); if (mz == NULL) { STACK_LOG_ERR("Cannot reserve stack memzone!\n"); - rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_eal_mcfg_tailq_write_unlock(); rte_free(te); return NULL; } @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ rte_stack_create(const char *name, unsigned int count, int socket_id, /* Store the name for later lookups */ ret = strlcpy(s->name, name, sizeof(s->name)); if (ret < 0 || ret >= (int)sizeof(s->name)) { - rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_eal_mcfg_tailq_write_unlock(); rte_errno = ENAMETOOLONG; rte_free(te); @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ rte_stack_create(const char *name, unsigned int count, int socket_id, TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(stack_list, te, next); - rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_eal_mcfg_tailq_write_unlock(); return s; } @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ rte_stack_free(struct rte_stack *s) return; stack_list = RTE_TAILQ_CAST(rte_stack_tailq.head, rte_stack_list); - rte_rwlock_write_lock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_eal_mcfg_tailq_write_lock(); /* find out tailq entry */ TAILQ_FOREACH(te, stack_list, next) { @@ -144,13 +144,13 @@ rte_stack_free(struct rte_stack *s) } if (te == NULL) { - rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_eal_mcfg_tailq_write_unlock(); return; } TAILQ_REMOVE(stack_list, te, next); - rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_eal_mcfg_tailq_write_unlock(); rte_free(te); @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ rte_stack_lookup(const char *name) stack_list = RTE_TAILQ_CAST(rte_stack_tailq.head, rte_stack_list); - rte_rwlock_read_lock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_eal_mcfg_tailq_read_lock(); TAILQ_FOREACH(te, stack_list, next) { r = (struct rte_stack *) te->data; @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ rte_stack_lookup(const char *name) break; } - rte_rwlock_read_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK); + rte_eal_mcfg_tailq_read_unlock(); if (te == NULL) { rte_errno = ENOENT; -- 2.17.1