DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guoyang Zhou <zhouguoyang@huawei.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, <bluca@debian.org>,
	<cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com>, <luoxianjun@huawei.com>,
	<yin.yinshi@huawei.com>, <luojiachen@huawei.com>,
	<zhouguoyang@huawei.com>, <chenlizhong@huawei.com>,
	<zhaohui8@huawei.com>, <chenchanghu@huawei.com>,
	<stevex.yang@intel.com>, <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/3] net/hinic: fix the problem of MTU inconsistent
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 17:54:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc6ea5994135fc1d207b6e29239f77b12371999d.1626429126.git.zhouguoyang@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1626429126.git.zhouguoyang@huawei.com>

The configuration of mtu is inconsistent in the driver and
firmware when the port is stopped, started and reconfigured.
Before, HINIC_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_SIZE include vlan tag, but when
frame and pktlen are converted to each other do not include
vlan tag. And port_mtu_set function will use HINIC_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_SIZE
to calculate eth_overhead, so mtu will be inconsistent in the driver and
firmware.

Fixes: e542ab51ab27 ("net/hinic: fix jumbo frame flag condition for MTU set")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Guoyang Zhou <zhouguoyang@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/net/hinic/base/hinic_pmd_niccfg.h |  9 ---------
 drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c      |  9 ---------
 drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.h      | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/hinic/base/hinic_pmd_niccfg.h b/drivers/net/hinic/base/hinic_pmd_niccfg.h
index 04cd374..0d0a670 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hinic/base/hinic_pmd_niccfg.h
+++ b/drivers/net/hinic/base/hinic_pmd_niccfg.h
@@ -116,15 +116,6 @@ enum hinic_link_mode {
 #define HINIC_DEFAULT_RX_MODE	(HINIC_RX_MODE_UC | HINIC_RX_MODE_MC |	\
 				HINIC_RX_MODE_BC)
 
-#define HINIC_MAX_MTU_SIZE		(9600)
-#define HINIC_MIN_MTU_SIZE		(256)
-
-/* MIN_MTU + ETH_HLEN + CRC (256+14+4) */
-#define HINIC_MIN_FRAME_SIZE		274
-
-/* MAX_MTU + ETH_HLEN + CRC + VLAN(9600+14+4+4) */
-#define HINIC_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_SIZE	(9622)
-
 #define HINIC_PORT_DISABLE		0x0
 #define HINIC_PORT_ENABLE		0x3
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c
index 75849f2..1a72401 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c
@@ -69,15 +69,6 @@
 
 #define HINIC_VLAN_FILTER_EN		(1U << 0)
 
-#define HINIC_MTU_TO_PKTLEN(mtu)	\
-	((mtu) + ETH_HLEN + ETH_CRC_LEN)
-
-#define HINIC_PKTLEN_TO_MTU(pktlen)	\
-	((pktlen) - (ETH_HLEN + ETH_CRC_LEN))
-
-/* The max frame size with default MTU */
-#define HINIC_ETH_MAX_LEN (RTE_ETHER_MTU + ETH_HLEN + ETH_CRC_LEN)
-
 /* lro numer limit for one packet */
 #define HINIC_LRO_WQE_NUM_DEFAULT	8
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.h
index 70b4d32..8f1b3d5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.h
+++ b/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.h
@@ -32,6 +32,23 @@
 #define HINIC_UINT32_BIT_SIZE      (CHAR_BIT * sizeof(uint32_t))
 #define HINIC_VFTA_SIZE            (4096 / HINIC_UINT32_BIT_SIZE)
 
+#define HINIC_MAX_MTU_SIZE              9600
+#define HINIC_MIN_MTU_SIZE              256
+
+#define HINIC_VLAN_TAG_SIZE             4
+#define HINIC_ETH_OVERHEAD \
+	(RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN + RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN + HINIC_VLAN_TAG_SIZE * 2)
+
+#define HINIC_MIN_FRAME_SIZE        (HINIC_MIN_MTU_SIZE + HINIC_ETH_OVERHEAD)
+#define HINIC_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_SIZE  (HINIC_MAX_MTU_SIZE + HINIC_ETH_OVERHEAD)
+
+#define HINIC_MTU_TO_PKTLEN(mtu)    ((mtu) + HINIC_ETH_OVERHEAD)
+
+#define HINIC_PKTLEN_TO_MTU(pktlen) ((pktlen) - HINIC_ETH_OVERHEAD)
+
+/* The max frame size with default MTU */
+#define HINIC_ETH_MAX_LEN           (RTE_ETHER_MTU + HINIC_ETH_OVERHEAD)
+
 enum hinic_dev_status {
 	HINIC_DEV_INIT,
 	HINIC_DEV_CLOSE,
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-16  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-16  9:54 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] fix some problems of mtu, vlan, lro Guoyang Zhou
2021-07-16  9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/3] net/hinic: increase the protection of the VLAN Guoyang Zhou
2021-07-16  9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/3] net/hinic/base: fix the problem of LRO Guoyang Zhou
2021-07-16  9:54 ` Guoyang Zhou [this message]
2021-07-23 13:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] fix some problems of mtu, vlan, lro Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bc6ea5994135fc1d207b6e29239f77b12371999d.1626429126.git.zhouguoyang@huawei.com \
    --to=zhouguoyang@huawei.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=chenchanghu@huawei.com \
    --cc=chenlizhong@huawei.com \
    --cc=cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=luojiachen@huawei.com \
    --cc=luoxianjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stevex.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=yin.yinshi@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhaohui8@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).