DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>
To: "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Jiang, JunyuX" <junyux.jiang@intel.com>,
	"Rong, Leyi" <leyi.rong@intel.com>,
	"Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
	"Sun, GuinanX" <guinanx.sun@intel.com>,
	"Guo, Junfeng" <junfeng.guo@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/ice: refactor the Rx FlexiMD handling
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 05:50:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <be9f8cc8935d4f7fa3440df57e8fef9b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN8PR11MB3795905574783414B349BE30F73B0@BN8PR11MB3795.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 1:42 PM
> To: Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Jiang, JunyuX
> <junyux.jiang@intel.com>; Rong, Leyi <leyi.rong@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming
> <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Sun, GuinanX <guinanx.sun@intel.com>; Guo,
> Junfeng <junfeng.guo@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] net/ice: refactor the Rx FlexiMD handling
> 
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 13:35
> > To: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Jiang, JunyuX
> > <junyux.jiang@intel.com>; Rong, Leyi <leyi.rong@intel.com>; Yang,
> > Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Sun, GuinanX <guinanx.sun@intel.com>;
> > Guo, Junfeng <junfeng.guo@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] net/ice: refactor the Rx FlexiMD handling
> >
> > Hi, haiyue
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 9:06 AM
> > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Jiang, JunyuX
> > > <junyux.jiang@intel.com>; Rong, Leyi <leyi.rong@intel.com>; Yang,
> > > Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Sun, GuinanX
> > > <guinanx.sun@intel.com>; Guo, Junfeng <junfeng.guo@intel.com>; Guo,
> > > Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH v3] net/ice: refactor the Rx FlexiMD handling
> > >
> > > The hardware supports many kinds of FlexiMDs set into Rx descriptor,
> > > and the FlexiMDs can have different offsets in the descriptor
> > > according the DDP package setting.
> > >
> > > The FlexiMDs type and offset are identified by the RXDID, which will
> > > be used to setup the queue.
> > >
> > > For expanding to support different RXDIDs in the future, refactor
> > > the Rx FlexiMD handling by the functions mapped to related RXDIDs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > v3: remove the typedef's ___rte_unused, and rewrite the commit title
> and
> > >     message.
> > > v2: assign the handle for ICE_RXDID_COMMS_OVS directly, not use
> > >     fall-through.
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c | 263 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > >  drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.h |   5 +
> > >  2 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c
> > > index
> > > fef6ad454..93a0ac691 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c
> > > @@ -25,40 +25,6 @@ uint64_t
> > > rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_ipv6_flow_mask;
> > >  uint64_t rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_tcp_mask;
> > >  uint64_t rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_ip_offset_mask;
> > >
> > > -static inline uint64_t
> > > -ice_rxdid_to_proto_xtr_ol_flag(uint8_t rxdid, bool *chk_valid) -{
> > > -static struct { -uint64_t *ol_flag; -bool chk_valid; -}
> > > ol_flag_map[] = { -[ICE_RXDID_COMMS_AUX_VLAN] = {
> > > -&rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_vlan_mask, true },
> > > -[ICE_RXDID_COMMS_AUX_IPV4] = {
> > > -&rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_ipv4_mask, true },
> > > -[ICE_RXDID_COMMS_AUX_IPV6] = {
> > > -&rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_ipv6_mask, true },
> > > -[ICE_RXDID_COMMS_AUX_IPV6_FLOW] = {
> > > -&rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_ipv6_flow_mask,
> > > true },
> > > -[ICE_RXDID_COMMS_AUX_TCP] = {
> > > -&rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_tcp_mask, true },
> > > -[ICE_RXDID_COMMS_AUX_IP_OFFSET] = {
> > > -&rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_ip_offset_mask,
> > > false },
> > > -};
> > > -uint64_t *ol_flag;
> > > -
> > > -if (rxdid < RTE_DIM(ol_flag_map)) { -ol_flag =
> > > ol_flag_map[rxdid].ol_flag; -if (!ol_flag) -return 0ULL;
> > > -
> > > -*chk_valid = ol_flag_map[rxdid].chk_valid; -return *ol_flag; -}
> > > -
> > > -return 0ULL;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > >  static inline uint8_t
> > >  ice_proto_xtr_type_to_rxdid(uint8_t xtr_type)  { @@ -76,6 +42,159
> > > @@ ice_proto_xtr_type_to_rxdid(uint8_t xtr_type)
> > > rxdid_map[xtr_type] :
> > > ICE_RXDID_COMMS_OVS;  }
> > >
> > > +static inline void
> > > +ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields_by_comms_ovs(__rte_unused struct
> ice_rx_queue
> > > *rxq,
> > > +   struct rte_mbuf *mb,
> > > +   volatile union ice_rx_flex_desc *rxdp) { volatile struct
> > > +ice_32b_rx_flex_desc_comms_ovs *desc = (volatile struct
> > > +ice_32b_rx_flex_desc_comms_ovs
> > > *)rxdp; #ifndef
> > > +RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_16BYTE_RX_DESC
> > > +uint16_t stat_err;
> > > +#endif
> >
> > This #ifndef could be better combine with below #ifndef.
> >
> 
> I changed it to according to the different offsets, like ovs has rss hash in
> Qword 3, which is after flow Id Qword 1, others are opposite. So that this
> handling order can reflect the offset difference, although, it MAY looks not
> so beautiful. What do you think ? :)
> 

I am not sure I got you point about the order reason, but I think in or out #ifndef should be clear show the offset difference, I am insist about that but if other also agree. And I still have 2 comments assume you are default agree and could I expect a new version or not?

> > > +
> > > +if (desc->flow_id != 0xFFFFFFFF) {
> > > +mb->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_FDIR | PKT_RX_FDIR_ID; hash.fdir.hi =
> > > +mb->rte_le_to_cpu_32(desc->flow_id);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_16BYTE_RX_DESC stat_err =
> > > +rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc->status_error0);
> > > +if (likely(stat_err & (1 <<
> > > ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS0_RSS_VALID_S))) {
> > > +mb->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_RSS_HASH;
> > > +mb->hash.rss = rte_le_to_cpu_32(desc->rss_hash);
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void
> > > +ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields_by_comms_aux_v1(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq,
> > > +      struct rte_mbuf *mb,
> > > +      volatile union ice_rx_flex_desc *rxdp) { volatile struct
> > > +ice_32b_rx_flex_desc_comms *desc = (volatile struct
> > > +ice_32b_rx_flex_desc_comms *)rxdp; uint16_t stat_err;
> > > +
> > > +stat_err = rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc->status_error0);
> > > +if (likely(stat_err & (1 <<
> > > ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS0_RSS_VALID_S))) {
> > > +mb->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_RSS_HASH;
> > > +mb->hash.rss = rte_le_to_cpu_32(desc->rss_hash);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_16BYTE_RX_DESC if (desc->flow_id !=
> > > +0xFFFFFFFF) {
> > > +mb->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_FDIR | PKT_RX_FDIR_ID; hash.fdir.hi =
> > > +mb->rte_le_to_cpu_32(desc->flow_id);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +if (rxq->xtr_ol_flag) {
> > > +uint32_t metadata = 0;
> > > +
> > > +stat_err = rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc->status_error1);
> > > +
> > > +if (stat_err & (1 <<
> > > ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS1_XTRMD4_VALID_S))
> > > +metadata = rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc-
> > > >flex_ts.flex.aux0);
> > > +
> > > +if (stat_err & (1 <<
> > > ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS1_XTRMD5_VALID_S))
> > > +metadata |=
> > > +rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc->flex_ts.flex.aux1)
> > > << 16;
> > > +
> > > +if (metadata) {
> > > +mb->ol_flags |= rxq->xtr_ol_flag;
> > > +
> > > +*RTE_NET_ICE_DYNF_PROTO_XTR_METADATA(mb)
> > > = metadata;
> > > +}
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void
> > > +ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields_by_comms_aux_v2(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq,
> > > +      struct rte_mbuf *mb,
> > > +      volatile union ice_rx_flex_desc *rxdp) { volatile struct
> > > +ice_32b_rx_flex_desc_comms *desc = (volatile struct
> > > +ice_32b_rx_flex_desc_comms *)rxdp; uint16_t stat_err;
> > > +
> > > +stat_err = rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc->status_error0);
> > > +if (likely(stat_err & (1 <<
> > > ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS0_RSS_VALID_S))) {
> > > +mb->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_RSS_HASH;
> > > +mb->hash.rss = rte_le_to_cpu_32(desc->rss_hash);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_16BYTE_RX_DESC if (desc->flow_id !=
> > > +0xFFFFFFFF) {
> > > +mb->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_FDIR | PKT_RX_FDIR_ID; hash.fdir.hi =
> > > +mb->rte_le_to_cpu_32(desc->flow_id);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +if (rxq->xtr_ol_flag) {
> > > +uint32_t metadata = 0;
> > > +
> > > +if (desc->flex_ts.flex.aux0 != 0xFFFF) metadata =
> > > +rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc-
> > > >flex_ts.flex.aux0);
> > > +else if (desc->flex_ts.flex.aux1 != 0xFFFF) metadata =
> > > +rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc-
> > > >flex_ts.flex.aux1);
> >
> > So you mean the ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS1_XTRMD4_VALID_S and
> > ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS1_XTRMD5_VALID_S
> > could not use to identify the IPv4 hdr offset and IPv6 hdr offset here in
> rxdid # 25?
> > And if yes they can and they will not set at the same time, is that separate
> this v2 from v1 necessary?
> >
> > > +
> > > +if (metadata) {
> > > +mb->ol_flags |= rxq->xtr_ol_flag;
> > > +
> > > +*RTE_NET_ICE_DYNF_PROTO_XTR_METADATA(mb)
> > > = metadata;
> > > +}
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void
> > > +ice_select_rxd_to_pkt_fields_handler(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq,
> > > +uint32_t
> > > +rxdid) {
> > > +switch (rxdid) {
> > > +case ICE_RXDID_COMMS_AUX_VLAN:
> > > +rxq->xtr_ol_flag =
> > > rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_vlan_mask;
> > > +rxq->rxd_to_pkt_fields =
> > > ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields_by_comms_aux_v1;
> > > +break;
> > > +
> > > +case ICE_RXDID_COMMS_AUX_IPV4:
> > > +rxq->xtr_ol_flag =
> > > rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_ipv4_mask;
> > > +rxq->rxd_to_pkt_fields =
> > > ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields_by_comms_aux_v1;
> > > +break;
> > > +
> > > +case ICE_RXDID_COMMS_AUX_IPV6:
> > > +rxq->xtr_ol_flag =
> > > rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_ipv6_mask;
> > > +rxq->rxd_to_pkt_fields =
> > > ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields_by_comms_aux_v1;
> > > +break;
> > > +
> > > +case ICE_RXDID_COMMS_AUX_IPV6_FLOW:
> > > +rxq->xtr_ol_flag =
> > > rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_ipv6_flow_mask;
> > > +rxq->rxd_to_pkt_fields =
> > > ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields_by_comms_aux_v1;
> > > +break;
> > > +
> > > +case ICE_RXDID_COMMS_AUX_TCP:
> > > +rxq->xtr_ol_flag = rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_tcp_mask;
> > > +rxq->rxd_to_pkt_fields =
> > > ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields_by_comms_aux_v1;
> > > +break;
> > > +
> > > +case ICE_RXDID_COMMS_AUX_IP_OFFSET:
> > > +rxq->xtr_ol_flag =
> > > rte_net_ice_dynflag_proto_xtr_ip_offset_mask;
> > > +rxq->rxd_to_pkt_fields =
> > > ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields_by_comms_aux_v2;
> > > +break;
> > > +
> > > +case ICE_RXDID_COMMS_OVS:
> > > +rxq->rxd_to_pkt_fields =
> > > ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields_by_comms_ovs;
> > > +break;
> > > +
> > > +default:
> > > +/* update this according to the RXDID for PROTO_XTR_NONE
> > > */
> > > +rxq->rxd_to_pkt_fields =
> > > ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields_by_comms_ovs;
> > > +break;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +if (!rte_net_ice_dynf_proto_xtr_metadata_avail())
> > > +rxq->xtr_ol_flag = 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static enum ice_status
> > >  ice_program_hw_rx_queue(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq)  { @@ -158,6
> > > +277,8 @@ ice_program_hw_rx_queue(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq)
> return
> > > -EINVAL;  }
> > >
> > > +ice_select_rxd_to_pkt_fields_handler(rxq, rxdid);
> > > +
> > >  /* Enable Flexible Descriptors in the queue context which
> > >   * allows this driver to select a specific receive descriptor format
> > >   */
> > > @@ -1338,74 +1459,6 @@ ice_rxd_to_vlan_tci(struct rte_mbuf *mb,
> > > volatile union ice_rx_flex_desc *rxdp)
> > >     mb->vlan_tci, mb->vlan_tci_outer);  }
> > >
> > > -#ifndef RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_16BYTE_RX_DESC -#define
> > > ICE_RX_PROTO_XTR_VALID \
> > > -((1 << ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS1_XTRMD4_VALID_S) | \
> > > - (1 << ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS1_XTRMD5_VALID_S))
> > > -
> > > -static void
> > > -ice_rxd_to_proto_xtr(struct rte_mbuf *mb,
> > > -     volatile struct ice_32b_rx_flex_desc_comms_ovs *desc)
> > > -{
> > > -uint16_t stat_err = rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc->status_error1);
> > > -uint32_t metadata = 0;
> > > -uint64_t ol_flag;
> > > -bool chk_valid;
> > > -
> > > -ol_flag = ice_rxdid_to_proto_xtr_ol_flag(desc->rxdid, &chk_valid);
> > > -if (unlikely(!ol_flag)) -return;
> > > -
> > > -if (chk_valid) {
> > > -if (stat_err & (1 <<
> > > ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS1_XTRMD4_VALID_S))
> > > -metadata = rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc-
> > > >flex_ts.flex.aux0);
> > > -
> > > -if (stat_err & (1 <<
> > > ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS1_XTRMD5_VALID_S))
> > > -metadata |=
> > > -rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc->flex_ts.flex.aux1)
> > > << 16;
> > > -} else {
> > > -if (rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc->flex_ts.flex.aux0) != 0xFFFF) -metadata
> > > = rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc-
> > > >flex_ts.flex.aux0);
> > > -else if (rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc->flex_ts.flex.aux1) != 0xFFFF)
> > > -metadata = rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc-
> > > >flex_ts.flex.aux1);
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -if (!metadata)
> > > -return;
> > > -
> > > -mb->ol_flags |= ol_flag;
> > > -
> > > -*RTE_NET_ICE_DYNF_PROTO_XTR_METADATA(mb) = metadata; -} -
> #endif
> > > -
> > > -static inline void
> > > -ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields(struct rte_mbuf *mb,
> > > -      volatile union ice_rx_flex_desc *rxdp)
> > > -{
> > > -volatile struct ice_32b_rx_flex_desc_comms_ovs *desc = -(volatile
> > > struct ice_32b_rx_flex_desc_comms_ovs *)rxdp; -#ifndef
> > > RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_16BYTE_RX_DESC -uint16_t stat_err;
> > > -
> > > -stat_err = rte_le_to_cpu_16(desc->status_error0);
> > > -if (likely(stat_err & (1 <<
> > > ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_STATUS0_RSS_VALID_S))) {
> > > -mb->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_RSS_HASH;
> > > -mb->hash.rss = rte_le_to_cpu_32(desc->rss_hash);
> > > -}
> > > -#endif
> > > -
> > > -if (desc->flow_id != 0xFFFFFFFF) {
> > > -mb->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_FDIR | PKT_RX_FDIR_ID; hash.fdir.hi =
> > > -mb->rte_le_to_cpu_32(desc->flow_id);
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -#ifndef RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_16BYTE_RX_DESC -if
> > > (unlikely(rte_net_ice_dynf_proto_xtr_metadata_avail()))
> > > -ice_rxd_to_proto_xtr(mb, desc);
> > > -#endif
> > > -}
> > > -
> > >  #define ICE_LOOK_AHEAD 8
> > >  #if (ICE_LOOK_AHEAD != 8)
> > >  #error "PMD ICE: ICE_LOOK_AHEAD must be 8\n"
> > > @@ -1463,7 +1516,7 @@ ice_rx_scan_hw_ring(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq)
> > > mb->packet_type = ptype_tbl[ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_PTYPE_M &
> > >
> > > rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxdp[j].wb.ptype_flex_flags0)];
> > >  ice_rxd_to_vlan_tci(mb, &rxdp[j]);
> > > -ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields(mb, &rxdp[j]);
> > > +rxq->rxd_to_pkt_fields(rxq, mb, &rxdp[j]);
> > >
> > >  mb->ol_flags |= pkt_flags;
> > >  }
> > > @@ -1760,7 +1813,7 @@ ice_recv_scattered_pkts(void *rx_queue,
> > > first_seg->packet_type = ptype_tbl[ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_PTYPE_M &
> > > rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxd.wb.ptype_flex_flags0)];
> > >  ice_rxd_to_vlan_tci(first_seg, &rxd);
> > > -ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields(first_seg, &rxd);
> > > +rxq->rxd_to_pkt_fields(rxq, first_seg, &rxd);
> > >  pkt_flags = ice_rxd_error_to_pkt_flags(rx_stat_err0);
> > >  first_seg->ol_flags |= pkt_flags;
> > >  /* Prefetch data of first segment, if configured to do so. */ @@
> > > -2160,7 +2213,7 @@ ice_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue,  rxm->packet_type =
> > > ptype_tbl[ICE_RX_FLEX_DESC_PTYPE_M &
> > > rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxd.wb.ptype_flex_flags0)];
> > >  ice_rxd_to_vlan_tci(rxm, &rxd);
> > > -ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields(rxm, &rxd);
> > > +rxq->rxd_to_pkt_fields(rxq, rxm, &rxd);
> > >  pkt_flags = ice_rxd_error_to_pkt_flags(rx_stat_err0);
> > >  rxm->ol_flags |= pkt_flags;
> > >  /* copy old mbuf to rx_pkts */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.h b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.h
> > > index
> > > 9fa57b3b2..de2291788 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.h
> > > @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@
> > >
> > >  typedef void (*ice_rx_release_mbufs_t)(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq);
> > > typedef void (*ice_tx_release_mbufs_t)(struct ice_tx_queue *txq);
> > > +typedef void (*ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields_t)(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq,
> > > +struct rte_mbuf *mb, volatile union ice_rx_flex_desc
> > > *rxdp);
> > >
> > >  struct ice_rx_entry {
> > >  struct rte_mbuf *mbuf;
> > > @@ -82,6 +85,8 @@ struct ice_rx_queue {
> > >  bool q_set; /* indicate if rx queue has been configured */
> > >  bool rx_deferred_start; /* don't start this queue in dev start */
> > >  uint8_t proto_xtr; /* Protocol extraction from flexible descriptor */
> > > +uint64_t xtr_ol_flag; /* Protocol extraction offload flag */
> > > +ice_rxd_to_pkt_fields_t rxd_to_pkt_fields;
> >
> > If create a function pointer here in .h, it is better add some doc.
> >
> > >  ice_rx_release_mbufs_t rx_rel_mbufs;
> > >  };
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.28.0
> >
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-22  5:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-17 11:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/ice: enhance the " Haiyue Wang
2020-09-17 12:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Haiyue Wang
2020-09-18  1:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/ice: refactor the Rx " Haiyue Wang
2020-09-22  5:35   ` Guo, Jia
2020-09-22  5:42     ` Wang, Haiyue
2020-09-22  5:50       ` Guo, Jia [this message]
2020-09-22  6:09         ` Wang, Haiyue
2020-09-22  6:14           ` Guo, Jia
2020-09-22  6:23             ` Wang, Haiyue
2020-09-22  6:33               ` Guo, Jia
2020-09-22  6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Haiyue Wang
2020-09-22  7:24   ` Guo, Jia
2020-09-22 12:58     ` Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=be9f8cc8935d4f7fa3440df57e8fef9b@intel.com \
    --to=jia.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=guinanx.sun@intel.com \
    --cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=junfeng.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=junyux.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=leyi.rong@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).