From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [Bug 1030] rte_malloc() and rte_free() get stuck when used with signal handler
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 12:47:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-1030-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/> (raw)
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030
Bug ID: 1030
Summary: rte_malloc() and rte_free() get stuck when used with
signal handler
Product: DPDK
Version: 22.03
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: core
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: sarosh.arif@emumba.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 205
--> https://bugs.dpdk.org/attachment.cgi?id=205&action=edit
calls rte_malloc and rte_free in the handler and main code
I have a dpdk based application which uses rte_malloc() and rte_free()
frequently in it's main code. The general method to close the application is
though sending SIGINT. The application has a signal handler written for cleanup
purposes before closing the application. The handler also uses rte_free() to
release some of the memory during cleanup. The application gets stuck in a
deadlock.
Upon investigation I found out that both rte_free() and rte_malloc() use
rte_spinlock_lock() function to place a lock on heap. While this lock is placed
and the application receives SIGINT, it goes into the handler without releasing
the lock. Since the handler itself calls rte_free() which tries to acquire the
lock it gets stuck.
I have attached a sample application to reproduce this problem.
Steps to reproduce this problem:
1. compile the code provided in attachment with any version of dpdk
2. run the compiled binary
3. press ctrl+c till the prints stop
Actual Results:
The application gets stuck in either rte_free() or rte_malloc()
Expected Results:
Application should allocate and free the memory without getting stuck
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2022-06-09 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-09 12:47 bugzilla [this message]
2022-06-09 15:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-06-10 6:04 ` Sarosh Arif
2022-06-11 16:25 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-06-13 9:48 ` Sarosh Arif
2022-10-05 17:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-16 9:37 ` bugzilla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-1030-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/ \
--to=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).