From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EDCA0544;
	Tue, 14 Jun 2022 21:07:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED8340DDD;
	Tue, 14 Jun 2022 21:07:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from inbox.dpdk.org (inbox.dpdk.org [95.142.172.178])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE5240220
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 21:07:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
 id 56EDBA0547; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 21:07:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [Bug 1034] [dpdk-22.07] ipsec-secgw inline test fail
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 19:07:33 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: DPDK
X-Bugzilla-Component: examples
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@dpdk.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform
 op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
 target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-1034-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1034

            Bug ID: 1034
           Summary: [dpdk-22.07] ipsec-secgw inline test fail
           Product: DPDK
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: examples
          Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
          Reporter: vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com
  Target Milestone: ---

To reproduce:
NIC used with test:
Network devices using DPDK-compatible driver
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
0000:af:00.1 '82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection 10fb' drv=3Dvf=
io-pci
unused=3Dixgbe

running command:
./examples/ipsec-secgw/test/run_test.sh -4i
starting inline test trs_aesgcm

Test environment configuration:
[enabled]  library mode
[disabled] extended sequence number
[disabled] sequence number atomic behavior
[enabled]  inline crypto mode
[disabled] crypto fallback mode
[disabled] multi-segment test

...
ERROR: ./examples/ipsec-secgw/test/linux_test.sh failed for dst=3D192.168.3=
1.14,
sz=3D1
inline test IPv4 trs_aesgcm finished with status 1
ERROR inline test trs_aesgcm FAILED

First bad commit:
commit d24471e5786b71e0c1cb3c2362397a1a27201a74 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
Author: Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
Date:   Sat Apr 30 02:14:11 2022 +0530

    examples/ipsec-secgw: disable Tx checksum for inline

    Enable Tx IPv4 checksum offload only when Tx inline crypto, lookaside
    crypto/protocol or cpu crypto is needed.
    For Tx Inline protocol offload, checksum computation
    is implicitly taken care by HW.

    Signed-off-by: Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
    Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
    Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=