From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCD441EAF; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:33:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D03E42C54; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:33:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from inbox.dpdk.org (inbox.dpdk.org [95.142.172.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86BC40FDF for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:33:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id D326241EB0; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:33:33 +0100 (CET) From: bugzilla@dpdk.org To: dev@dpdk.org Subject: [Bug 1191] rte_acl_classify returning mismatch result Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 09:33:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: DPDK X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: Utsav.Shrivastav@ibm.com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@dpdk.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=16789592130.8973C.458920 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --16789592130.8973C.458920 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:33:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1191 Bug ID: 1191 Summary: rte_acl_classify returning mismatch result Product: DPDK Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: other Assignee: dev@dpdk.org Reporter: Utsav.Shrivastav@ibm.com Target Milestone: --- Hi, > Version Details=20 DPDK Version : 19.11.10 Architecture : s390x (Big-Endian) Linux OS Kernel : 5.4.0-128-generic Ubuntu Version : 18.04.6 LTS > Issue: We are using ACL Library apis as part of DPDK application. As part of our application we are trying to set following simple egress rule using function rte_acl_add_rules(): src: 0.0.0.0/0 dst: 0.0.0.0/0 src port: 0:65535 dst port: 1:65535 protocol/mask: 6/255 category mask: 1 priority: 1 userdata: 536870912 (0x20000000) The setting and building of rules are success. We are then passing tcp packet to check if the same is getting matched. When rte_acl_classify() is invoked with tcp(0x6) data as argument, we are getting result as 0 instead of 0x2. So, a mismatch on the protocol rule is observed= and therefore packet is dropped on egress.=20 Can you provide some insights on the issue ?=20 Regards, Utsav --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --16789592130.8973C.458920 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:33:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Bug ID 1191
Summary rte_acl_classify returning mismatch result
Product DPDK
Version unspecified
Hardware Other
OS Linux
Status UNCONFIRMED
Severity normal
Priority Normal
Component other
Assignee dev@dpdk.org
Reporter Utsav.Shrivastav@ibm.com
Target Milestone --- 

Hi,

> Version Details 
DPDK Version : 19.11.10
Architecture : s390x (Big-Endian)
Linux OS Kernel : 5.4.0-128-generic
Ubuntu Version : 18.04.6 LTS

> Issue:
We are using ACL Library apis as part of DPDK application. As part of our
application we are trying to set following simple egress rule using function
rte_acl_add_rules():
src: 0.0.0.0/0
dst: 0.0.0.0/0
src port: 0:65535
dst port: 1:65535
protocol/mask: 6/255
category mask: 1 priority: 1 userdata: 536870912 (0x20000000)
The setting and building of rules are success.
We are then passing tcp packet to check if the same is getting matched. When
rte_acl_classify() is invoked with tcp(0x6) data as argument, we are getting
result as 0 instead of 0x2. So, a mismatch on the protocol rule is observed=
 and
therefore packet is dropped on egress.=20

Can you provide some insights on the issue ?=20

Regards,
Utsav

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
= --16789592130.8973C.458920--