DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [Bug 1203] ice: cannot create 2 rte_flows with 2 actions, only with 1 action
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:54:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-1203-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3426 bytes --]

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1203

            Bug ID: 1203
           Summary: ice: cannot create 2 rte_flows with 2 actions, only
                    with 1 action
           Product: DPDK
           Version: 23.03
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: ethdev
          Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
          Reporter: maxime.leroy@6wind.com
  Target Milestone: ---

kernel driver: 1.10.1.2.2
firmware-version: 4.10 0x80015191 1.3310.0
COMMS DDP: 1.3.37
ICE OS Default Package version 1.3.30.0
testpmd cmdline: ./build/app/dpdk-testpmd --log-level=.*ice.*,debug
--legacy-mem -c 7 -a 17:00.0 -a 0000:17:00.1  --  -i --nb-cores=2 --nb-ports=2
--total-num-mbufs=2048


RTE_FLOWS rules can be created
------------------------------


With queue action:

testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1  / end actions
queue index 0 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end 
actions queue index 0 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #1 created

With mark action:

testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1  / end actions
mark id 1 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end 
actions mark id 1 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #1 created

RTE_FLOWS rules cannot be created
---------------------------------

with mark + queue action:

testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1  / end actions
mark id 1 / queue index 0 / end
ice_fdir_rx_parsing_enable(): FDIR processing on RX set to 1
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (1) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end actions
 mark id 1 / queue index 0 / end
ice_fdir_cross_prof_conflict(): Failed to create profile for flow type 1 due to
conflict with existing rule of flow type 4.
ice_flow_create(): Failed to create flow
port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 2 (flow rule (handle)): Profile
configure failed.: Invalid argument

with mark + passthru action:

testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1  / end actions
mark id 1 / passthru / end
ice_fdir_rx_parsing_enable(): FDIR processing on RX set to 1
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (1) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end actions
 mark id 1 / passthru / end
ice_fdir_cross_prof_conflict(): Failed to create profile for flow type 1 due to
conflict with existing rule of flow type 4.
ice_flow_create(): Failed to create flow
port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 2 (flow rule (handle)): Profile
configure failed.: Invalid argument

Question
--------

1. Does ice nics support to have several actions ?
2. What is the difference between MARK vs MARK+PASSTRHU ?
   It seems to be the same:
   http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=0f664f7d57268f9ab9bdef95f0d48b3ce5004a61
   In this case, there is no reason to support MARK and not MARK+PASSTRHU with
2   flows.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5413 bytes --]

                 reply	other threads:[~2023-03-30  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-1203-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).