From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path:
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01BA42850;
Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:54:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8676A410D3;
Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:54:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from inbox.dpdk.org (inbox.dpdk.org [95.142.172.178])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4543840E25
for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:54:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
id 3689A42861; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:54:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [Bug 1203] ice: cannot create 2 rte_flows with 2 actions, only with
1 action
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:54:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: DPDK
X-Bugzilla-Component: ethdev
X-Bugzilla-Version: 23.03
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: maxime.leroy@6wind.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@dpdk.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform
op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
target_milestone
Message-ID:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=16801664400.d608b7.3202948
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
--16801664400.d608b7.3202948
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:54:00 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1203
Bug ID: 1203
Summary: ice: cannot create 2 rte_flows with 2 actions, only
with 1 action
Product: DPDK
Version: 23.03
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: ethdev
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: maxime.leroy@6wind.com
Target Milestone: ---
kernel driver: 1.10.1.2.2
firmware-version: 4.10 0x80015191 1.3310.0
COMMS DDP: 1.3.37
ICE OS Default Package version 1.3.30.0
testpmd cmdline: ./build/app/dpdk-testpmd --log-level=3D.*ice.*,debug
--legacy-mem -c 7 -a 17:00.0 -a 0000:17:00.1 -- -i --nb-cores=3D2 --nb-po=
rts=3D2
--total-num-mbufs=3D2048
RTE_FLOWS rules can be created
------------------------------
With queue action:
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1 / end actions
queue index 0 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end=20
actions queue index 0 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #1 created
With mark action:
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1 / end actions
mark id 1 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end=20
actions mark id 1 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #1 created
RTE_FLOWS rules cannot be created
---------------------------------
with mark + queue action:
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1 / end actions
mark id 1 / queue index 0 / end
ice_fdir_rx_parsing_enable(): FDIR processing on RX set to 1
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (1) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end act=
ions
mark id 1 / queue index 0 / end
ice_fdir_cross_prof_conflict(): Failed to create profile for flow type 1 du=
e to
conflict with existing rule of flow type 4.
ice_flow_create(): Failed to create flow
port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 2 (flow rule (handle)): Profile
configure failed.: Invalid argument
with mark + passthru action:
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1 / end actions
mark id 1 / passthru / end
ice_fdir_rx_parsing_enable(): FDIR processing on RX set to 1
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (1) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end act=
ions
mark id 1 / passthru / end
ice_fdir_cross_prof_conflict(): Failed to create profile for flow type 1 du=
e to
conflict with existing rule of flow type 4.
ice_flow_create(): Failed to create flow
port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 2 (flow rule (handle)): Profile
configure failed.: Invalid argument
Question
--------
1. Does ice nics support to have several actions ?
2. What is the difference between MARK vs MARK+PASSTRHU ?
It seems to be the same:
http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=3D0f664f7d57268f9ab9bdef95f0d48b3ce5=
004a61
In this case, there is no reason to support MARK and not MARK+PASSTRHU w=
ith
2 flows.
--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=
--16801664400.d608b7.3202948
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:54:00 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
ice: cannot create 2 rte_flows with 2 actions, only with 1 ac=
tion
Product
DPDK
Version
23.03
Hardware
All
OS
All
Status
UNCONFIRMED
Severity
normal
Priority
Normal
Component
ethdev
Assignee
dev@dpdk.org
Reporter
maxime.leroy@6wind.com
Target Milestone
---
kernel driver: 1.10.1.2.2
firmware-version: 4.10 0x80015191 1.3310.0
COMMS DDP: 1.3.37
ICE OS Default Package version 1.3.30.0
testpmd cmdline: ./build/app/dpdk-testpmd --log-level=3D.*ice.*,debug
--legacy-mem -c 7 -a 17:00.0 -a 0000:17:00.1 -- -i --nb-cores=3D2 --nb-po=
rts=3D2
--total-num-mbufs=3D2048
RTE_FLOWS rules can be created
------------------------------
With queue action:
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1 / end acti=
ons
queue index 0 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end=
=20
actions queue index 0 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #1 created
With mark action:
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1 / end acti=
ons
mark id 1 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end=
=20
actions mark id 1 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #1 created
RTE_FLOWS rules cannot be created
---------------------------------
with mark + queue action:
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1 / end acti=
ons
mark id 1 / queue index 0 / end
ice_fdir_rx_parsing_enable(): FDIR processing on RX set to 1
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (1) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end =
actions
mark id 1 / queue index 0 / end
ice_fdir_cross_prof_conflict(): Failed to create profile for flow type 1 du=
e to
conflict with existing rule of flow type 4.
ice_flow_create(): Failed to create flow
port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 2 (flow rule (handle)): Profile
configure failed.: Invalid argument
with mark + passthru action:
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1 / end acti=
ons
mark id 1 / passthru / end
ice_fdir_rx_parsing_enable(): FDIR processing on RX set to 1
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (1) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end =
actions
mark id 1 / passthru / end
ice_fdir_cross_prof_conflict(): Failed to create profile for flow type 1 du=
e to
conflict with existing rule of flow type 4.
ice_flow_create(): Failed to create flow
port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 2 (flow rule (handle)): Profile
configure failed.: Invalid argument
Question
--------
1. Does ice nics support to have several actions ?
2. What is the difference between MARK vs MARK+PASSTRHU ?
It seems to be the same:
http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=3D0f664f7d57268f9ab9=
bdef95f0d48b3ce5004a61
In this case, there is no reason to support MARK and not MARK+PASSTRHU w=
ith
2 flows.