From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC5F43D22; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:30:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B5F402CB; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:30:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from inbox.dpdk.org (inbox.dpdk.org [95.142.172.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7CB4003C for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:30:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 5D94343D23; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:30:38 +0100 (CET) From: bugzilla@dpdk.org To: dev@dpdk.org Subject: [DPDK/ethdev Bug 1406] "net/ice" and "net/i40e" have not implemented outer UDP checksum offload, but the capability flag has been set. Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:30:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: DPDK X-Bugzilla-Component: ethdev X-Bugzilla-Version: 23.11 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: junwang01@cestc.cn X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@dpdk.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=17111034370.d6CF.287302 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --17111034370.d6CF.287302 Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:30:37 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1406 Bug ID: 1406 Summary: "net/ice" and "net/i40e" have not implemented outer UDP checksum offload, but the capability flag has been set. Product: DPDK Version: 23.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: ethdev Assignee: dev@dpdk.org Reporter: junwang01@cestc.cn Target Milestone: --- As shown in [1],a geneve packet with TSO request is transmitted, and result= ing packets mismatch because of the wrong checksum in the outer UDP header (it = is the same as the one in the original superframe). However, since the test se= es capability bit TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_UDP_CKSUM in device info, the checksum is expected to be offloaded. Both X710 and E810 encounter the same issue. Upon reviewing the unloading portion of the code, it's evident that only adding capabilities without unloading part of the code was implemented. [1] https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs-issues/issues/321 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --17111034370.d6CF.287302 Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:30:37 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All

Bug ID	1406
Summary	"net/ice" and "net/i40e" have not impleme= nted outer UDP checksum offload, but the capability flag has been set.
Product	DPDK
Version	23.11
Hardware	All
OS	All
Status	UNCONFIRMED
Severity	normal
Priority	Normal
Component	ethdev
Assignee	dev@dpdk.org
Reporter	junwang01@cestc.cn
Target Milestone	---

As shown in [1],a geneve packet wi=
th TSO request is transmitted, and resulting
packets mismatch because of the wrong checksum in the outer UDP header (it =
is
the same as the one in the original superframe). However, since the test se=
es
capability bit TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_UDP_CKSUM in device info, the checksum is
expected to be offloaded.

Both X710 and E810 encounter the same issue. Upon reviewing the unloading
portion of the code, it's evident that only adding capabilities without
unloading part of the code was implemented.

[1] https:=
//github.com/openvswitch/ovs-issues/issues/321

You are receiving this mail because:

You are the assignee for the bug.

=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20

= --17111034370.d6CF.287302--