* [DPDK/ethdev Bug 1638] Differences in how different Intel NICs handle maximum packet length for jumbo frame
@ 2025-02-03 3:05 bugzilla
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: bugzilla @ 2025-02-03 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1251 bytes --]
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1638
Bug ID: 1638
Summary: Differences in how different Intel NICs handle maximum
packet length for jumbo frame
Product: DPDK
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: ethdev
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: nandinipersad361@gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
10 Gigabit Ethernet devices from Intel do not take VLAN tags into account when
calculating packet size while Gigabit Ethernet devices do so for jumbo frames.
Implication:
When receiving packets with VLAN tags, the actual maximum size of useful
payload that Intel Gigabit Ethernet devices are able to receive is 4 bytes (or
8 bytes in the case of packets with extended VLAN tags) less than that of Intel
10 Gigabit Ethernet devices.
Resolution/Workaround:
Increase the configured maximum packet size when using Intel Gigabit Ethernet
devices.
Affected Environment/Platform:
All.
Driver/Module:
Poll Mode Driver (PMD).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3142 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-02-03 3:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-03 3:05 [DPDK/ethdev Bug 1638] Differences in how different Intel NICs handle maximum packet length for jumbo frame bugzilla
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).