From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path:
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAAF46342;
Tue, 4 Mar 2025 20:37:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6388402EB;
Tue, 4 Mar 2025 20:37:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from inbox.dpdk.org (inbox.dpdk.org [95.142.172.178])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFAD402DF
for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 20:37:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
id 379CD46343; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 20:37:53 +0100 (CET)
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [DPDK/core Bug 1667] Can't configure DPDK poller in busy loop to fix
drops
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 19:37:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: DPDK
X-Bugzilla-Component: core
X-Bugzilla-Version: 24.11
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fgiordano@riverbed.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@dpdk.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
References:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=17411170730.Ff4BC.4117393
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
--17411170730.Ff4BC.4117393
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 20:37:53 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1667
fgiordano@riverbed.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from fgiordano@riverbed.com ---
Never mind, the problem seems to be with the scheduling policy (and its
priority) that I use for the poller. With non-realtime scheduling policies,=
I
can run the poller in busy loop at 100% and not drop a single packet. The b=
ug
is invalid.
--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=
--17411170730.Ff4BC.4117393
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 20:37:53 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
fgiordano@river=
bed.com changed
bug 1667
Never mind, the problem seems to b=
e with the scheduling policy (and its
priority) that I use for the poller. With non-realtime scheduling policies,=
I
can run the poller in busy loop at 100% and not drop a single packet. The b=
ug
is invalid.