From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [DPDK/ethdev Bug 1690] Calling rte_eth_dev_get_module_info() and rte_eth_dev_get_module_eeprom() for MLX ConnectX-6 spawn errors when transceiver not inserted
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 20:12:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-1690-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2440 bytes --]
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1690
Bug ID: 1690
Summary: Calling rte_eth_dev_get_module_info() and
rte_eth_dev_get_module_eeprom() for MLX ConnectX-6
spawn errors when transceiver not inserted
Product: DPDK
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: ethdev
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: yogev@cgstowernetworks.com
Target Milestone: ---
For Mellanox 'MT2892 Family [ConnectX-6 Dx] 101d'
Calling the dpdk-testpmd's "show port 0 module_eeprom" results in an error when
a transceiver isn't inserted.
The error is spawned from the mlx source:
drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_ethdev_os.c
In two places:
```
int mlx5_get_module_info(...)
{
...
ret = mlx5_ifreq(dev, SIOCETHTOOL, &ifr);
if (ret) {
DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "port %u ioctl(SIOCETHTOOL) failed: %s",
dev->data->port_id, strerror(rte_errno));
return ret;
}
...
}
```
And
```
int mlx5_get_module_eeprom(...)
{
...
ret = mlx5_ifreq(dev, SIOCETHTOOL, &ifr);
if (ret)
DRV_LOG(WARNING, "port %u ioctl(SIOCETHTOOL) failed: %s",
dev->data->port_id, strerror(rte_errno));
...
}
```
dpdk-testpmd shows:
```
testpmd> show port 0 module_eeprom
mlx5_net: port 0 ioctl(SIOCETHTOOL) failed: Input/output error //
<------------ this error.
device is removed
```
When trying to use these functions in my own application, as dpdk-testpmd does:
rte_eth_dev_get_module_info() and rte_eth_dev_get_module_eeprom() this error
log gets printed as well.
An expected result would be to check out the return value and print these
errors if required by the caller.
For my scenario, I would like a silence fail in case there's no transceiver.
I've tried to overcome this by asking first if a device "exists" using
rte_eth_dev_is_removed() and rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port() but they don't reflect
the transceiver state.
A possible solution would be to print these errors in DEBUG
Please advice,
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4427 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-1690-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/ \
--to=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).