From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path:
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C3146528;
Mon, 7 Apr 2025 16:54:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF6140A70;
Mon, 7 Apr 2025 16:54:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from inbox.dpdk.org (inbox.dpdk.org [95.142.172.178])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD82340A6F
for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 16:54:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
id 978DF4652A; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 16:54:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [DPDK/ethdev Bug 1693] ring PMD rte_eth_from_ring does not do what
is expected
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 14:54:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: DPDK
X-Bugzilla-Component: ethdev
X-Bugzilla-Version: 25.03
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: stephen@networkplumber.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@dpdk.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform
op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
target_milestone
Message-ID:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=17440376510.a286aB.3847567
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
--17440376510.a286aB.3847567
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 16:54:10 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1693
Bug ID: 1693
Summary: ring PMD rte_eth_from_ring does not do what is
expected
Product: DPDK
Version: 25.03
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: ethdev
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: stephen@networkplumber.org
Target Milestone: ---
The function rte_eth_from_ring does not really do what it says on the tin.
The programmer would expect that the ring passed would be used to make an
ethdev.
Instead the name is used as a seed to a new ring name ETH_RXTX0_XXXX.
Not sure if it ever did the right thing.
One would expect the passed in ring would become the ring used for the ethd=
ev.
Instead the passed in ring is never used.
--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=
--17440376510.a286aB.3847567
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 16:54:11 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
ring PMD rte_eth_from_ring does not do what is expected
Product
DPDK
Version
25.03
Hardware
All
OS
All
Status
UNCONFIRMED
Severity
normal
Priority
Normal
Component
ethdev
Assignee
dev@dpdk.org
Reporter
stephen@networkplumber.org
Target Milestone
---
The function rte_eth_from_ring doe=
s not really do what it says on the tin.
The programmer would expect that the ring passed would be used to make an
ethdev.
Instead the name is used as a seed to a new ring name ETH_RXTX0_XXXX.
Not sure if it ever did the right thing.
One would expect the passed in ring would become the ring used for the ethd=
ev.
Instead the passed in ring is never used.