* [DPDK/ethdev Bug 1725] iavf pmd vlan Issue: dpdk-22.11.0
@ 2025-06-17 6:35 bugzilla
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: bugzilla @ 2025-06-17 6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3090 bytes --]
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1725
Bug ID: 1725
Summary: iavf pmd vlan Issue: dpdk-22.11.0
Product: DPDK
Version: 22.11
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: Normal
Component: ethdev
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: amiyaranjan.mohakud@gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi All,
I'm encountering an issue with XL710 SR-IOV on KVM for VLAN packets with
DPDK-22.11.0 version.
Issue Description: I have disabled RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP in
rte_eth_conf and calling rte_eth_dev_configure and expecting my dpdk
application to receive the packets with vlan tags. Later I added some vlans
using rte_eth_dev_vlan_filter() and I see that the vlan is getting stripped off
for the incoming packets.
Setup Details:(KVM SR-IOV)
KVM Host: Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS: kernel version: 5.4.0-216-generic #236-Ubuntu
NIC: XL710
3b:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller XL710 for
40GbE QSFP+ (rev 02)
3b:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller XL710 for
40GbE QSFP+ (rev 02)
i40e PF Driver: Out of tree 2.20.12
Firmware: 9.00/9.40
DPDK Version: 22.11.0
Observation/Analysis:
I could see that even after disabling RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP offload
flag, when I receive the packets, the mbuf offload flags (RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN |
RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED) are set inside the mbuf. This confirms that the
driver is stripping off the vlans.
I tried with recommended PF driver version for DPDK-22.11.0 as per
https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2023-November/281700.html and DPDK-22.11
release note https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/rel_notes/release_22_11.html. Still it
did not help.
Intel® Ethernet Converged Network Adapter XL710-QDA2 (2X40G)
Firmware version(PF): 9.00 0x8000ce86 1.3179.0
Device id (pf/vf): 8086:1583 / 8086:154c
Driver version(out-tree): 2.20.12 (i40e)
Driver version(in-tree): 5.15.0-46-generic (i40e)
Upon debugging further, I came across a DPDK commit:
https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/commit/e25c7ed114b296ddaa583427824acc30bcf9c85d
which says it sets the vlan_strip on in PF when we set vlan filter on VF.
I picked the fix, but still it did not help.
Later when I debugged further, I found that the vf_cap_flags is set to
VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_VLAN_V2 for the above PF driver and still it sets the
vlan_strip on. I extended the dpdk commit for the VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_VLAN_V2
case which fixed the issue.
I just want to know if it's a known issue for the VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_VLAN_V2
case. I understand it's a known issue for VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_VLAN_V1 and dpdk
has a fix for it.
Do we need to add the fix for VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_VLAN_V2 as well. Can we
mainstream it? If yes, please let me know so that I can raise a pull request
for it, if required.
Regards
Amiya
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-06-17 6:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-17 6:35 [DPDK/ethdev Bug 1725] iavf pmd vlan Issue: dpdk-22.11.0 bugzilla
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).