DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [Bug 55] I40E PMD driver in vector mode implicitly requires number of RX descriptors in a ring to be power of two
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 10:50:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55-3@http.dpdk.org/tracker/> (raw)

https://dpdk.org/tracker/show_bug.cgi?id=55

            Bug ID: 55
           Summary: I40E PMD driver in vector mode implicitly requires
                    number of RX descriptors in a ring to be power of two
           Product: DPDK
           Version: 17.11
          Hardware: x86
                OS: Linux
            Status: CONFIRMED
          Severity: major
          Priority: Normal
         Component: ethdev
          Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
          Reporter: kjeld.mortensen@tieto.com
  Target Milestone: ---

We have experienced instability of the I40E PMD in case it is compiled in
vector mode (CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_I40E_INC_VECTOR).

General observation:

We see instability in case we set the number of RX descriptors in a ring buffer
to something which is NOT the power of two.

Debugging was done on 17.11, but code inspection was performed on latest
master.

---
Observation 1, process hang (infinite loop?):

Debugging points to:
_i40e_rx_queue_release_mbufs_vec
http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h#n144

Here the else-part contains a loop which iterates over:
 i = (i + 1) & mask;
The mask is:
 const unsigned mask = rxq->nb_rx_desc - 1;

This suggests that nb_rx_desc assumes a power of two.

---
Observation 2, some RX packets are unexpectedly empty (but we do not have in
depth view in this case):

A more general (quick and incomplete) code inspection of the RX vector part of
the I40E driver source code gave the following finding:

In the procedure _recv_raw_pkts_vec,
http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_sse.c#n453
we have:
  rxq->rx_tail = (uint16_t)(rxq->rx_tail & (rxq->nb_rx_desc - 1));

Again this suggests to me that it is assumed that nb_rx_desc should be a power
of two in the vector case.

---

We certainly understand that one can optimize performance using a power-of-two
assumption about the RX ring buffer size. For example, this seems what the
FM10K driver does:
  15.2.1.1. Prerequisites and Pre-conditions
  http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/nics/fm10k.html
In this case FM10K has documented the "limitation" and also has an explicit
check using the rte_is_power_of_2 procedure in case of vectorization.

Should we have something similar for I40E in vector mode? 

--
Kjeld Mortensen
Tieto

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-05-30 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55-3@http.dpdk.org/tracker/ \
    --to=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).