From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (xvm-189-124.dc0.ghst.net [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72496A09FF; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:34:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1D1160810; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:34:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from inbox.dpdk.org (xvm-172-178.dc0.ghst.net [95.142.172.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAED160808 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:34:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 262D7A0A01; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:34:30 +0100 (CET) From: bugzilla@dpdk.org To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 07:34:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: DPDK X-Bugzilla-Component: testpmd X-Bugzilla-Version: 20.11 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: Kumar.amber@intel.com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@dpdk.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [dpdk-dev] [Bug 573] [dpdk-20.11]rss_to_rte_flow/set_key_keylen: create rule failed: Invalid argument. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D573 kumar amber (Kumar.amber@intel.com) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Kumar.amber@intel.com Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from kumar amber (Kumar.amber@intel.com) --- This looks not necessary for me, cause Intel NIC usually not support per RSS queue group, For ice driver, we accept null queue configure, because a RSS configure always apply on all queues implicitly and I think it should be the same for i40e Otherwise, it=E2=80=99s always a burden for application to fi= ll the queue array for each rule creation. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=