From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85A745B4C; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:56:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1EA4029B; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:56:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6944029A for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:56:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE006497; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 07:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPV6:2a00:23ee:1c38:8fd:315c:1089:dfb7:1da5] (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EBA53F73B; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 07:56:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:56:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] DTS external DPDK build Content-Language: en-GB To: Dean Marx Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Paul Szczepanek , Patrick Robb References: <20240930160204.19582-1-tomas.durovec@pantheon.tech> <20241021134935.1210500-1-luca.vizzarro@arm.com> From: Luca Vizzarro In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 21/10/2024 23:39, Dean Marx wrote: > Hi Luca, > > I noticed in the new version of this series the "improve statistics" > patch was taken out, was there any reason for this? I believe Juraj > wanted to create a feature that wrote all of the test suite/case > summaries in a JSON/text output file, is this going to be implemented > later or in a different format? Hi Dean, Sorry for causing confusion! Like Paul mentioned, this was split in a different patchset by Tomáš himself in the non-RFC patchset. I haven't had a chance to give it a good look. Once I download it, rebase, solve merge conflicts and apply any changes (review) needed, I'll send it out. In the meantime do you mind providing a review to the patch that Paul linked, so that I could also apply your comments if you have any. Thanks, Luca