DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
To: ohilyard@iol.unh.edu
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, david.marchand@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] lib/rte_rib6: fix stack buffer overflow
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 19:27:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c18d7072-21ed-1cec-5f40-61cc81c84f90@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f3f01d2-c476-88fc-c028-270b766fd215@intel.com>



On 18/06/2021 19:22, Medvedkin, Vladimir wrote:
> Hi Owen,
> 
> Just a few nits inlined below
> 
> On 16/06/2021 21:18, ohilyard@iol.unh.edu wrote:
>> From: Owen Hilyard <ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>
>>
>> ASAN found a stack buffer overflow in lib/rib/rte_rib6.c:get_dir.
>> The fix for the stack buffer overflow was to make sure depth
>> was always < 128, since when depth = 128 it caused the index
>> into the ip address to be 16, which read off the end of the array.
>>
>> While trying to solve the buffer overflow, I noticed that a few
>> changes could be made to remove the for loop entirely.
>>
>> Fixes: f7e861e21c ("rib: support IPv6")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Owen Hilyard <ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>
>> ---
>>   lib/rib/rte_rib6.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/rib/rte_rib6.c b/lib/rib/rte_rib6.c
>> index f6c55ee45..a4daf12ca 100644
>> --- a/lib/rib/rte_rib6.c
>> +++ b/lib/rib/rte_rib6.c
>> @@ -79,20 +79,31 @@ is_covered(const uint8_t 
>> ip1[RTE_RIB6_IPV6_ADDR_SIZE],
>>   static inline int
>>   get_dir(const uint8_t ip[RTE_RIB6_IPV6_ADDR_SIZE], uint8_t depth)
>>   {
>> -    int i = 0;
>> -    uint8_t p_depth, msk;
>> -
>> -    for (p_depth = depth; p_depth >= 8; p_depth -= 8)
>> -        i++;
>> -
>> -    msk = 1 << (7 - p_depth);
>> -    return (ip[i] & msk) != 0;
>> +    uint8_t index, msk;
>> +
>> +    /* depth & 127 clamps depth to values that will not
> 
> Please be consistent with the coding style. Check 1.3.1 in 
> https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/coding_style.html
> 
>> +     * read off the end of ip.
>> +     * depth is the number of bits deep into ip to traverse, and
>> +     * is incremented in blocks of 8 (1 byte). This means the last
>> +     * 3 bits are irrelevant to what the index of ip should be.
>> +     */
>> +    index = (depth & 127) >> 3;
> 
> (depth & INT8_MAX) / UINT8_MAX ?

Ugh...
sed 's/UINT8_MAX/CHAR_BIT'

> 
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * msk is the bitmask used to extract the bit used to decide the
>> +     * direction of the next step of the binary search.
>> +     */
>> +    msk = 1 << (7 - (depth & 7));
>> +
>> +    return (ip[index] & msk) != 0;
>>   }
>>   static inline struct rte_rib6_node *
>>   get_nxt_node(struct rte_rib6_node *node,
>>       const uint8_t ip[RTE_RIB6_IPV6_ADDR_SIZE])
>>   {
>> +    if (node->depth == 128)
>> +        return NULL;
> 
> please use RIB6_MAXDEPTH instead of 128.
> Also I'd put a blank line before the final return.
> 
>>       return (get_dir(ip, node->depth)) ? node->right : node->left;
>>   }
>>
> 
> while this is a bug fix, please add Cc: stable@dpdk.org on v3 to 
> backport this patch.
> 
> Apart from that LGTM.
> 

-- 
Regards,
Vladimir

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-18 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-16 16:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " ohilyard
2021-06-16 16:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-06-16 17:27   ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-06-16 18:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " ohilyard
2021-06-18 16:22   ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-06-18 16:27     ` Medvedkin, Vladimir [this message]
2021-06-21 13:28   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " ohilyard
2021-06-22  7:10     ` David Marchand
2021-06-22 10:51       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-06-23 15:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] rib: fix max depth IPv6 lookup ohilyard
2021-06-24 13:23       ` David Marchand
2021-06-24  9:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] lib/rte_rib6: fix stack buffer overflow Medvedkin, Vladimir

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c18d7072-21ed-1cec-5f40-61cc81c84f90@intel.com \
    --to=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ohilyard@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).