Re: [PATCH 4/5] net/bnxt: use fp ops setup function

[Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>]

02/03/2023 12:30, Konstantin Ananyev пишет:
> 
>> Use rte_eth_fp_ops_setup() instead of directly manipulating
>> rte_eth_fp_ops variable.
>>
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_cpr.c    | 5 +----
>>   drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 5 +----
>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_cpr.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_cpr.c
>> index 3950840600..a3f33c24c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_cpr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_cpr.c
>> @@ -416,10 +416,7 @@ void bnxt_stop_rxtx(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>>   	eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = rte_eth_pkt_burst_dummy;
>>   	eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = rte_eth_pkt_burst_dummy;
> 
> I am not that familiar with bnxt driver, but shouldn't we set here
> other optional fp_ops (descripto_status, etc.) to some dummy values OR to null values?

After another thought - wouldn't it be better just to call 
fp_ops_reset() here?

>   
>>
>> -	rte_eth_fp_ops[eth_dev->data->port_id].rx_pkt_burst =
>> -		eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst;
>> -	rte_eth_fp_ops[eth_dev->data->port_id].tx_pkt_burst =
>> -		eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst;
>> +	rte_eth_fp_ops_setup(eth_dev);
>>   	rte_mb();
>>
>>   	/* Allow time for threads to exit the real burst functions. */
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
>> index 4083a69d02..d6064ceea4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
>> @@ -4374,10 +4374,7 @@ static void bnxt_dev_recover(void *arg)
>>   	if (rc)
>>   		goto err_start;
>>
>> -	rte_eth_fp_ops[bp->eth_dev->data->port_id].rx_pkt_burst =
>> -		bp->eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst;
>> -	rte_eth_fp_ops[bp->eth_dev->data->port_id].tx_pkt_burst =
>> -		bp->eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst;
>> +	rte_eth_fp_ops_setup(bp->eth_dev);
>>   	rte_mb();
>>
>>   	PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "Port: %u Recovered from FW reset\n",
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>