From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAB2A04C7; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:57:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF855137D; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:57:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3B8DE0 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:57:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 082GXeGW033618; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:57:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=6drzsM0W1X83NKlEFqZswvyWRFmGzFXwC6c1UyPVm/g=; b=ZKLxrXS6QjjiitjQ/sSZviuYqeZ8GEJ4dbd1hXkU79TL1p+8Rvugiok6VvYQ8xmNBYtQ 9Hs6Aj1drIGMOjWj8x8o/DNdymS8HcaPnmGKFNUXVrfInIuxoaqsgPvqHm+AMbLHzuOH pdHLvfvkbQrcQOjm6/Bna+InTnrhIvvNBcGGJp99+hMUkm6S0PKp1Ef2fk6PpOZekZMV 2kHZJLcG4NjkmXUQLhX+9R/y4kHhh5EFm5yGPX2e+p4Zwz2/PCR1ryGd8NnDnBL/yxw1 73PfPS6Zqir8J15TxjV5I/a2EoK53p2vzhTVKb/ANBZzp7XXDeKx1HEeDaZMdTQj5Xd+ /w== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33aefs1p84-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 02 Sep 2020 12:57:05 -0400 Received: from m0098413.ppops.net (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 082GY9l1035368; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:57:05 -0400 Received: from ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (a.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.10]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33aefs1p7t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 02 Sep 2020 12:57:05 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 082GqAAx004597; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:57:04 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.28]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 337ena1rgw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 02 Sep 2020 16:57:04 +0000 Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.111]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 082Gv3iQ57672146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:57:03 GMT Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8526AC05F; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:57:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB89AC059; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:57:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Davids-MBP.randomparity.org (unknown [9.163.89.253]) by b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:57:02 +0000 (GMT) To: Radu Nicolau , dev@dpdk.org Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, david.marchand@redhat.com, viktorin@rehivetech.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, jerinj@marvell.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com References: <20200902104343.31774-1-radu.nicolau@intel.com> From: David Christensen Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 09:57:02 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200902104343.31774-1-radu.nicolau@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-02_11:2020-09-02, 2020-09-02 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1011 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=854 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009020153 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/4] Remove RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_ macros X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 9/2/20 3:43 AM, Radu Nicolau wrote: > Remove RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_ macros from the build. > Deprecation notice sent, pasted here for reference: > > build macros: The macros defining RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_* will be removed > from the build. The information provided by these macros is available > through standard compiler macros. For example, RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE3 > duplicates the compiler-provided macro __SSE3__. > > Radu Nicolau (4): > x86: change cpuflag macros to compiler macros > arm: change cpuflag macros to compiler macros > ppc: change cpuflag macros to compiler macros > doc: remove reference to RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG I'm not too familiar with clang and icc. Do all compilers use the same macro definitions for the same CPU features? I would have thought the RTE_* definitions were there because there are compiler or compiler version differences that need to be supported. Dave