From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D201B126 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:04:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Sep 2018 10:04:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,285,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="71880808" Received: from fyigit-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.39]) ([10.237.221.39]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Sep 2018 10:04:12 -0700 To: Igor Russkikh , dev@dpdk.org Cc: pavel.belous@aquantia.com, Thomas Monjalon , Stephen Hemminger References: <1536838528-11800-1-git-send-email-igor.russkikh@aquantia.com> <5db0866a-66f8-9547-244e-7697eb13c12d@intel.com> <9ea3f7ac-415f-c3f5-8d9b-4cd5ffdc80bd@aquantia.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:04:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9ea3f7ac-415f-c3f5-8d9b-4cd5ffdc80bd@aquantia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/21] net/atlantic: atlantic PMD driver skeleton X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:04:31 -0000 On 9/21/2018 4:35 PM, Igor Russkikh wrote: > Hi Ferruh, > > Thanks for your comments! > All understood, we'll fix that in next version. > > Another question related to new PMDs integration process: > I have not found any requirements or statements on passing/supporting DPDK Test Suite for new PMDs. > Do you have any expectations here? No we don't have that requirement, and DTS is for integration test mostly. In summit Stephen suggested a test/unit test to verify PMDs if they are correct against ethdev APIs, but we don't have this kind of verification yet. Thanks, ferruh