From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740E9FBA1 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:59:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2016 08:59:00 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,379,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="20798492" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.29]) ([10.237.220.29]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2016 08:58:59 -0800 From: Ferruh Yigit To: "Zhao1, Wei" , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <1480675394-59179-1-git-send-email-wei.zhao1@intel.com> <1480675394-59179-5-git-send-email-wei.zhao1@intel.com> Cc: "Lu, Wenzhuo" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:58:58 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1480675394-59179-5-git-send-email-wei.zhao1@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/18] net/ixgbe: restore n-tuple filter X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:59:01 -0000 On 12/2/2016 10:43 AM, Wei Zhao wrote: > From: wei zhao1 > > Add support for restoring n-tuple filter in SW. > > Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu > Signed-off-by: wei zhao1 > --- > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c <...> > @@ -2482,6 +2496,7 @@ ixgbe_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > > /* resume enabled intr since hw reset */ > ixgbe_enable_intr(dev); > + ixgbe_filter_restore(dev); Just to double check, when you stop the device does 5tuple_filter reset? If not reset, will adding same filters cause any problem? > > return 0; > <...>