DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Balazs Nemeth <bnemeth@redhat.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] vhost: move allocation of mbuf outside of packet enqueue
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:37:28 +0200
Message-ID: <c87cc63a-b49c-5e42-9d45-af4eda1c1138@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7b08832f86d2fb9a8834b2a19b13f26d3c6857b.1617790501.git.bnemeth@redhat.com>

Hi Balazs,

Hint for future revisions, please add a cover letter when multiple
patches, it makes the series handling for the maintainer easier.
Also, please use the MAINTAINERS file to add the other maintainers.

On 4/7/21 12:17 PM, Balazs Nemeth wrote:
> In preparation for subsequent patches, move mbuf allocation out and
> rename virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc to virtio_dev_pktmbuf_prep. This
> function now receives an already allocated mbuf pointer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Balazs Nemeth <bnemeth@redhat.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> index 7f621fb6d..666e7fdb8 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> @@ -2166,6 +2166,23 @@ virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc(struct virtio_net *dev, struct rte_mempool *mp,
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static __rte_always_inline int
> +virtio_dev_pktmbuf_prep(struct virtio_net *dev, struct rte_mbuf *pkt,
> +			 uint32_t data_len)
> +{
> +	if (rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(pkt) >= data_len)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* attach an external buffer if supported */
> +	if (dev->extbuf && !virtio_dev_extbuf_alloc(pkt, data_len))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* check if chained buffers are allowed */
> +	if (!dev->linearbuf)
> +		return 0;

Add new line here.

> +	return 1;

Maybe return a negative value for consistency.

> +}
> +
>  static __rte_noinline uint16_t
>  virtio_dev_tx_split(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>  	struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool, struct rte_mbuf **pkts, uint16_t count)
> @@ -2259,7 +2276,6 @@ virtio_dev_tx_split(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>  static __rte_always_inline int
>  vhost_reserve_avail_batch_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
>  				 struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> -				 struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool,
>  				 struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
>  				 uint16_t avail_idx,
>  				 uintptr_t *desc_addrs,
> @@ -2304,8 +2320,7 @@ vhost_reserve_avail_batch_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
>  	}
>  
>  	vhost_for_each_try_unroll(i, 0, PACKED_BATCH_SIZE) {
> -		pkts[i] = virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc(dev, mbuf_pool, lens[i]);
> -		if (!pkts[i])
> +		if (virtio_dev_pktmbuf_prep(dev, pkts[i], lens[i]))
>  			goto free_buf;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2326,16 +2341,12 @@ vhost_reserve_avail_batch_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
>  	return 0;
>  
>  free_buf:

It is no more freeing here, so better to rename the label.

> -	for (i = 0; i < PACKED_BATCH_SIZE; i++)
> -		rte_pktmbuf_free(pkts[i]);
> -
>  	return -1;
>  }
>  
>  static __rte_always_inline int
>  virtio_dev_tx_batch_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
>  			   struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> -			   struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool,
>  			   struct rte_mbuf **pkts)
>  {
>  	uint16_t avail_idx = vq->last_avail_idx;
> @@ -2345,8 +2356,8 @@ virtio_dev_tx_batch_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
>  	uint16_t ids[PACKED_BATCH_SIZE];
>  	uint16_t i;
>  
> -	if (vhost_reserve_avail_batch_packed(dev, vq, mbuf_pool, pkts,
> -					     avail_idx, desc_addrs, ids))
> +	if (vhost_reserve_avail_batch_packed(dev, vq, pkts, avail_idx,
> +					     desc_addrs, ids))
>  		return -1;
>  
>  	vhost_for_each_try_unroll(i, 0, PACKED_BATCH_SIZE)
> @@ -2396,8 +2407,8 @@ vhost_dequeue_single_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
>  					 VHOST_ACCESS_RO) < 0))
>  		return -1;
>  
> -	*pkts = virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc(dev, mbuf_pool, buf_len);
> -	if (unlikely(*pkts == NULL)) {
> +
> +	if (unlikely(virtio_dev_pktmbuf_prep(dev, *pkts, buf_len))) {
>  		if (!allocerr_warned) {
>  			VHOST_LOG_DATA(ERR,
>  				"Failed mbuf alloc of size %d from %s on %s.\n",
> @@ -2416,7 +2427,6 @@ vhost_dequeue_single_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
>  				dev->ifname);
>  			allocerr_warned = true;
>  		}
> -		rte_pktmbuf_free(*pkts);
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2459,22 +2469,38 @@ virtio_dev_tx_packed(struct virtio_net *dev,
>  {
>  	uint32_t pkt_idx = 0;
>  	uint32_t remained = count;
> +	uint16_t i;
>  
>  	do {
>  		rte_prefetch0(&vq->desc_packed[vq->last_avail_idx]);
>  
>  		if (remained >= PACKED_BATCH_SIZE) {
> -			if (!virtio_dev_tx_batch_packed(dev, vq, mbuf_pool,
> +			vhost_for_each_try_unroll(i, 0, PACKED_BATCH_SIZE) {
> +				pkts[pkt_idx + i] =
> +					rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mbuf_pool);

No check on whether the alloc succeeded?

Also, we recently move to up to 100 chars lines, so maybe it can fit in
a single one here now.

> +			}
> +
> +			if (!virtio_dev_tx_batch_packed(dev, vq,
>  							&pkts[pkt_idx])) {

Ditto

>  				pkt_idx += PACKED_BATCH_SIZE;
>  				remained -= PACKED_BATCH_SIZE;
> +
>  				continue;
> +			} else {
> +				vhost_for_each_try_unroll(i, 0,
> +					PACKED_BATCH_SIZE) {

Same here

> +					rte_pktmbuf_free(pkts[pkt_idx + i]);
> +				}
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> +		pkts[pkt_idx] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mbuf_pool);

Here also you may want to ensure the allocation succeeded.

> +
>  		if (virtio_dev_tx_single_packed(dev, vq, mbuf_pool,
> -						&pkts[pkt_idx]))
> +						&pkts[pkt_idx])) {
> +			rte_pktmbuf_free(pkts[pkt_idx]);
>  			break;
> +		}
>  		pkt_idx++;
>  		remained--;
>  
> 

Maxime


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-15 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-06 15:44 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Use bulk alloc/free in virtio packed Balazs Nemeth
2021-04-06 15:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] vhost: move allocation of mbuf outside of packet enqueue Balazs Nemeth
2021-04-07 10:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Balazs Nemeth
2021-04-15 12:37     ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2021-04-16  8:18     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] vhost: allocate and free packets in bulk Balazs Nemeth
2021-04-16  8:36       ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-16  9:05       ` David Marchand
2021-04-16  9:12         ` Balazs Nemeth
2021-04-16  9:41           ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-16  9:43           ` David Marchand
2021-04-16  9:48       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Balazs Nemeth
2021-04-16 10:25         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] vhost: allocate and free packets in bulk in Tx packed Balazs Nemeth
2021-04-16 11:14           ` David Marchand
2021-04-21  7:48           ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-28  3:16             ` Xia, Chenbo
2021-04-07 10:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] vhost: perform all mbuf allocations in one loop Balazs Nemeth
2021-04-15 15:30     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-07 10:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] vhost: allocate and free packets in bulk Balazs Nemeth
2021-04-15 15:32     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-15 15:45       ` David Marchand
2021-04-15 15:50         ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-15 15:58           ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-07 10:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] vhost: remove unnecessary level of indirection Balazs Nemeth
2021-04-15 15:38     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-04-06 15:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] vhost: perform all mbuf allocations in one loop Balazs Nemeth
2021-04-06 15:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] vhost: allocate and free packets in bulk Balazs Nemeth
2021-04-06 15:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] vhost: remove unnecessary level of indirection Balazs Nemeth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c87cc63a-b49c-5e42-9d45-af4eda1c1138@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=bnemeth@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git