DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
	<thomas@monjalon.net>, <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: check for Rx RSS distribution and RSS hash
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:31:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c88570d3-cf87-4eb1-422a-0663bbc33049@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b229ff77-6e92-ad5b-9dcb-b069ffe18e4e@solarflare.com>



在 2020/4/27 20:49, Andrew Rybchenko 写道:
> On 4/27/20 3:34 PM, Lijun Ou wrote:
>> When rte api checks the Rx RSS distribution is enable but the RSS
>> hash is disabled, it will return an error.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>> index 0854ef8..07734c4 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>> @@ -1411,6 +1411,17 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
>>   		goto rollback;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	/* Check if Rx RSS distribution is enable but RSS hash is disabled. */
>> +	if (((dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode & ETH_MQ_RX_RSS_FLAG) != 0) &&
>> +	    !(dev_conf->rxmode.offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH)) {
>> +		RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
>> +			"Ethdev port_id=%u config valid Rx mq_mode with RSS but %s offload is no-requested\n",
>> +			port_id,
>> +			rte_eth_dev_rx_offload_name(DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH));
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto rollback;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	/*
>>   	 * Setup new number of RX/TX queues and reconfigure device.
>>   	 */
> 
> NACK. It is perfectly fine to do distribution, but do not need RSS hash
> information.
>   - ETH_MQ_RX_RSS_FLAG controls RSS hash calculation and distribution
>   - DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH controls delivery of the hash value
>     itself from HW to SW
> 
Thanks for your detail explanation. I still have a question, what is the 
use of setting DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_HASH, what is the difference between user 
configuration DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_HASH and no configuration?

> .
> 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-29  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-27 12:34 Lijun Ou
2020-04-27 12:49 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-04-27 13:27   ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-04-29  6:41     ` oulijun
2020-04-29 12:42       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-01 16:04         ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-04-29  6:31   ` oulijun [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c88570d3-cf87-4eb1-422a-0663bbc33049@huawei.com \
    --to=oulijun@huawei.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).