From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30478A09EF; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:54:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7A22B83; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:54:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F97E2142 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:54:30 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1608105268; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=K2eYvFGtUxKNT0HypGO15gLGO/TpYvBnH9Mp5hHZN+o=; b=RlOiYDrApKwWGxc6W9z+WkVqi1/T18XtWBae9ZEq7Z1Fen8xeSFw8f2ncEZDVKB+GiWVGq VHCQq0WtG5/+CgF/2visRHIHQpktyJppnugeg+qjeIYTyNPNm9FKZic/QI2BtE94CLmtsi wTTAhFGeNuOHesv+ZR7oIM+lfXfJgXc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-269-yrQrULkmOgGIOCNx5U0p5A-1; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 02:54:27 -0500 X-MC-Unique: yrQrULkmOgGIOCNx5U0p5A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 382A0107ACE4; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 07:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.110.42] (unknown [10.36.110.42]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EFC2704DA; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 07:54:19 +0000 (UTC) To: =?UTF-8?B?6LCi5Y2O5LyfKOatpOaXtuatpOWIu++8iQ==?= , David Marchand Cc: "ferruh.yigit" , dev , "Burakov, Anatoly" , Zhihong Wang , "Xia, Chenbo" , Gaetan Rivet , Thomas Monjalon References: <68ecd941-9c56-4de7-fae2-2ad15bdfd81a@alibaba-inc.com> <1603381885-88819-1-git-send-email-huawei.xhw@alibaba-inc.com> <0fefe2e6-1a4d-0579-4b59-92088bfaa276@alibaba-inc.com> From: Maxime Coquelin Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:54:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] support both PIO and MMIO BAR for virtio PMD X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Huawei, On 12/14/20 3:24 PM, 谢华伟(此时此刻） wrote: > Hi Maxime and David: > > Could we start to review this patch? Yes, I plan to work on it after the holidays, let's target -rc1. Thanks, Maxime > /Thanks, huawei > > > On 2020/11/10 20:42, David Marchand wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 1:35 PM 谢华伟(此时此刻） >> wrote: >>> Previously there are different ways to get port address based on >>> different DPDK uio driver(IGB_UIO/UIO_PCI_GENERIC/VFIO), which is >>> actually not necessary. >>> >>> This patch makes IO/MMIO port map/RW API more generic, which also >>> supports MMIO.  It also fixes performance issue with vfio. >>> >>> Could you spare some time to have time to review this? >> This is too touchy and I don't want to mess virtio support this late >> in the release. >> I asked for Maxime to have a look, but he seems really busy. >> >> This will have to wait next release. >> >