DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com>
Cc: xiaoyun.li@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, linuxarm@openeuler.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4] app/testpmd: support Tx mbuf free on demand cmd
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:28:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca13d258-ee16-77f1-0118-d8b0f111d07b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1618835784-57993-1-git-send-email-oulijun@huawei.com>

On 4/19/2021 1:36 PM, Lijun Ou wrote:
> From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> 
> This patch support tx_done_cleanup command:
> tx_done_cleanup port (port_id) (queue_id) (free_cnt)
> 

Instead of creating a new root level, 'tx_done_cleanup' command, what do you 
think to use existing port command, something like:

"port cleanup <port_id> txq <queue_id> <free_cnt>"

> Users must make sure there are no concurrent access to the same Tx
> queue (like rte_eth_tx_burst, rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_stop and so on)
> this command executed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com>
> ---
> V3->V4:
> - revert the V3 scheme.
> 
> V2->V3:
> - The command implementation is changed so that the queuestate does
>    not depend on the command execution.
> 
> V1->V2:
> - use Tx instead of TX
> - add note in doc
> ---
>   app/test-pmd/cmdline.c                      | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst      |  2 +
>   doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 11 ++++
>   3 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> index 5bf1497..b43964d 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> @@ -675,6 +675,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>   			"set port (port_id) ptype_mask (ptype_mask)\n"
>   			"    set packet types classification for a specific port\n\n"
>   
> +			"tx_done_cleanup (port_id) (queue_id) (free_cnt)\n"
> +			"    Cleanup a Tx queue's mbuf on a port\n\n"
> +

If 'free_cnt' is '0', driver should free all possible mbufs, can you add this 
detail to help?

>   			"set port (port_id) queue-region region_id (value) "
>   			"queue_start_index (value) queue_num (value)\n"
>   			"    Set a queue region on a port\n\n"
> @@ -16915,6 +16918,86 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_showport_macs = {
>   	},
>   };
>   
> +/* *** tx_done_cleanup *** */
> +struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result {
> +	cmdline_fixed_string_t clean;
> +	cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
> +	uint16_t port_id;
> +	uint16_t queue_id;
> +	uint32_t free_cnt;
> +};
> +
> +static void
> +cmd_tx_done_cleanup_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> +			   __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
> +			   __rte_unused void *data)
> +{
> +	struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result *res = parsed_result;
> +	uint16_t port_id = res->port_id;
> +	uint16_t queue_id = res->queue_id;
> +	uint32_t free_cnt = res->free_cnt;
> +	struct rte_eth_txq_info qinfo;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (rte_eth_tx_queue_info_get(port_id, queue_id, &qinfo)) {
> +		printf("Failed to get port %u Tx queue %u info!\n",
> +		       port_id, queue_id);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (qinfo.queue_state != RTE_ETH_QUEUE_STATE_STARTED) {
> +		printf("TX queue %u not started!\n", queue_id);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup is a dataplane API, user must make sure
> +	 * there are no concurrent access to the same Tx queue (like
> +	 * rte_eth_tx_burst, rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_stop and so on) when this API
> +	 * called.
> +	 */

Should there be a check to see if testpmd forwarding is stared or not?
This API shouldn't be allowed when forwarding is started.

> +	ret = rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup(port_id, queue_id, free_cnt);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		printf("Failed to cleanup mbuf for port %u Tx queue %u "
> +		       "error desc: %s(%d)\n",
> +		       port_id, queue_id, strerror(-ret), ret);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	printf("Cleanup port %u Tx queue %u mbuf nums: %u\n",
> +	       port_id, queue_id, ret);
> +}
> +
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_clean =
> +	TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result, clean,
> +				 "tx_done_cleanup");
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_port =
> +	TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result, port,
> +				 "port");
> +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_port_id =
> +	TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result, port_id,
> +			      UINT16);
> +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_queue_id =
> +	TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result, queue_id,
> +			      UINT16);
> +cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_free_cnt =
> +	TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result, free_cnt,
> +			      UINT32);
> +
> +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup = {
> +	.f = cmd_tx_done_cleanup_parsed,
> +	.data = NULL,
> +	.help_str = "tx_done_cleanup port <port_id> <queue_id> <free_cnt>",
> +	.tokens = {
> +		(void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_clean,
> +		(void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_port,
> +		(void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_port_id,
> +		(void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_queue_id,
> +		(void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_free_cnt,
> +		NULL,
> +	},
> +};
> +
>   /* ******************************************************************************** */
>   
>   /* list of instructions */
> @@ -17040,6 +17123,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
>   	(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_rss_reta,
>   	(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_showport_reta,
>   	(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_showport_macs,
> +	(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup,
>   	(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_burst,
>   	(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_thresh,
>   	(cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_threshold,
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
> index 4538bb9..554499f 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
> @@ -217,6 +217,8 @@ New Features
>       ``show port (port_id) rxq (queue_id) desc used count``
>     * Added command to dump internal representation information of single flow.
>       ``flow dump (port_id) rule (rule_id)``
> +  * Added command to cleanup a Tx queue's mbuf on a port.
> +    ``tx_done_cleanup port <port_id> <queue_id> <free_cnt>``
>   
>   * **Updated ipsec-secgw sample application.**
>   
> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> index a736e7d..6472647 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> @@ -270,6 +270,17 @@ and ready to be processed by the driver on a given RX queue::
>   
>      testpmd> show port (port_id) rxq (queue_id) desc used count
>   
> +cleanup txq mbufs
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +Request the driver to free mbufs currently cached by the driver for a given port's
> +Tx queue::
> +   testpmd> tx_done_cleanup port (port_id) (queue_id) (free_cnt)
> +
> +.. note::
> +   This command is dangerous, users must make sure there are no cucurrent access to
> +   the same Tx queue (link rte_eth_tx_burst, rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_stop and so on).
> +
>   show config
>   ~~~~~~~~~~~
>   
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-19 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-05  7:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Lijun Ou
2021-03-05  7:46 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-03-05  9:58   ` oulijun
2021-03-05  9:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] " Lijun Ou
2021-03-08 17:33   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-09  8:49     ` oulijun
2021-03-09  9:53       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-09  9:57         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-09 10:18           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-09 14:00         ` Aaron Conole
2021-03-09 14:13           ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-10  1:48         ` oulijun
2021-03-10  7:59           ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-12 10:29             ` [dpdk-dev] [Linuxarm] " oulijun
2021-03-12 11:21               ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-17 11:30                 ` oulijun
2021-03-17 12:07                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-18  3:56                     ` oulijun
2021-03-18  7:51                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-12 13:12   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-19  3:11     ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-19 12:40       ` oulijun
2021-04-19 14:56         ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-19 12:36     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-19 15:28       ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2021-04-21  1:44         ` oulijun
2021-04-21  8:09       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V5] app/test-pmd: support cleanup txq mbufs command Lijun Ou
2021-04-21  8:15         ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-21  8:32           ` oulijun
2021-04-21  8:45         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V6] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-21 11:26           ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ca13d258-ee16-77f1-0118-d8b0f111d07b@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
    --cc=oulijun@huawei.com \
    --cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).